I'm posting this in all of my games - over the past few days I've had something of a family emergency that has severely limited my online time. While I've generally kept up-to-date with all my games by reading on my iPhone, I've not had the chance to post. Fortunately the issue has now been somewhat resolved so I'm currently in the process of getting caught up and writing posts etc. Apologies for my brief absence but, unfortunately, it was unavoidable and I'm now back and in the swing of things. Thanks.
[i]"Awesome Proton Pack, Flay!"[/i] - [size=75][b]Petroleumjelly[/b][/size]
[i]"It would be suicide for scum to go after Mert"[/i] - [size=75][b]Dral[/b][/size]
Chamber and Primate have a good-sized lead at this point.
Do not unvote them or vote for anyone else, unless you specifically do not want one or both of them to be Tribunal. With the deadline close, it is your responsibility to check you aren't causing us to lose out on a Tribunal by voting for someone else, or unvoting Primate/chamber.
Hopefully unnecessary, but I don't want any "Oops, I didn't realize I caused a tie in the voting" crap.
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
FYI, my choice, if not chamber, would be rabies because I think it would be beneficial to give him a platform, irrespective of alignment. Also more than happy with Chamber, obviously.
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
1) Stop throwing around opinions like they're facts
2) Make a decent argument for why ScumTribunal is a terrible thing
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
scumtribunal negates lynch later flips scum
Wifom stew.
As for why he's scum, just read any of his posts.
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
'Scum are forced to take a definite stance one way or the other on multiple potential lynch targets much more if they are a Tribunal than if they are a normal person for the day.'
chesskid, do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
Agree. I see what you're getting at, but I still don't want a scum tribunal
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
'It is a good thing for the Town if Scum are forced to take a definite stance on all the potential lynches in a given day.'
Agree or disagree?
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
I'm not playing Devil's Advocate here. I'm seriously unclear about why everyone's freaking out about the possibility that a good Scum player will be forced to take a stand on the Execution target(s), even if it may perhaps WIFOMly cost us a Scum execution on Day 1.
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
Because he could also banish a town execution
Can we just please not make rabies a tribune? PLEASE?
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
chesskid3 wrote:Because he could also banish a town execution
Can we just please not make rabies a tribune? PLEASE?
Fine. In that case he saves us a Town lynch and is still forced to take an absolute stand. Awesome. Go us.
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
And then when he flips scum later we waste the lynch later likely
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
Then even if we were dumb enough to lynch someone just because a Scum saved them, we traded a Scum lynch for a Town lynch. Go us.
(11:04:10 PM) senspizzaline: That's actually my bold prediction for the year
(11:04:19 PM) senspizzaline: Miami finishes 2nd in the AFCE.
(11:05:35 PM) jhawk01b: my bold prediction for the year is that whoever wins the NFC West will have a winning record
Someone kill this tool please. He claims doc nightkill himlololok
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
Sens, you are making no sense.
Having a scum tribune will give scum power. We do not want scum to have power.
The more power is in town's hand, the more town can force the action of players.
Town force players to commit to their reads.
Also, you are totally overrating "committing to reads". If scum-tribune has to choose whether to save or not someone, he/she just play it easy and do what town wants. You cannot accuse someone of doing what the majority of the town wants.
ya he's scum too. But I'm not posting content today, remember?
Papa Zito - "Your signature has been blanked...we remove signatures at a users request if said signature references them, or if it quotes from a thread in the Speakeasy, which is not allowed without permission of the poster"
