Mini 1079: Midnight Mafia- Game End

Mitsuru Kirijo · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Fri Nov 26, 2010 5:39 pm

Hoho. Very funny.

Parama · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:03 am

ATTENTION:
Nexus has made 13 posts in other threads since the last time he posted in this thread.

HAMMER AT WILL, PLEASE. I'm NOT WAITING A SECOND LONGER FOR SCUM.

Zdenek · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:24 am

That's good enough for me. Nexus isn't arguing against the case on him and he's doing no scum hunting. I'm willing to hammer.

Nexus claim please.

Parama · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:53 am

ZDENEK. THAT IS THE WRONG WAY TO DO IT.
HE HAS HAD TIME TO CLAIM.
HE IS FRIKKIN' DUE FOR A PROD.
I MIGHT AS WELL LYNCH YOU NEXT BECAUSE YOUR POST SCREAMS "HI I'M NEXUS' SCUMBUDDY!!!!"

Parama · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 4:53 am

Code: Select all

[b]unvote, vote: Nexus[/b]

^Copypasta that. RIGHT NOW.

Nexus · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:35 am

I claim VT.

I didn't bother claiming 'cos you won't believe me. Parama is a scumbag and you're all blindly following him.

Parama · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:42 am

Why am I scum?

Zdenek · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:44 am

Parama wrote:ZDENEK. THAT IS THE WRONG WAY TO DO IT.
HE HAS HAD TIME TO CLAIM.
HE IS FRIKKIN' DUE FOR A PROD.
I MIGHT AS WELL LYNCH YOU NEXT BECAUSE YOUR POST SCREAMS "HI I'M NEXUS' SCUMBUDDY!!!!"

I see no reason why the Nexus situation warrants a change to the usual claiming protocol: claims at L-1 with a willing hammer.

preview edit: nexus just claimed VT.
I don't buy it as I see no reason for a VT to have pulled that vanishing act.

Vote: Nexus

Parama · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:46 am

A player who is intentionally avoiding the thread is not town, Zdenek.

Nexus · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:51 am

Parama · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 7:56 am

RichardGHP · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 9:36 am

bv310 · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 9:39 am

RichardGHP · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 9:43 am

It's not funny anymore.
_________

That was the hammer, right?

Parama · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:04 am

Yeah great job lynching scum guys

Nathanael · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:31 am

and tomorrow we lynch his buddy Mitsuru, ok?

Parama · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:53 am

You mean Zdenek?

Nathanael · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 10:56 am

Parama wrote:You mean Zdenek?

Actually I was getting town-vibes from zdenek.

Parama · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 11:03 am

Well he's scum with Nexus so... you're wrong.

RichardGHP · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:03 pm

I think Parama might actually be on the right track with his reads this game.

Zdenek · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:05 pm

There is no case on me. Nexus was scummy, and the fact he was avoiding the thread increased the likelihood he was scum and made me seriously doubt that he was frustrated town (which was the only thing that made me doubt the case against him). I could have seen a town PR stop posting after a wagon formed on him (like slowsilver did day one), but not a VT, which is why I asked for a claim.

Parama · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:57 pm

Zdenek wrote:There is no case on me.

Mitsuru Kirijo · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 5:25 pm

I wish I actually had a case to make outside of active lurking, but I don't.

Charlie · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:27 pm

Kanashimi · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Sun Nov 28, 2010 10:30 am

Mitsuru Kirijo wrote:I wish I actually had a case to make outside of active lurking, but I don't.

This. I will think i'll invent a case just to get out of active lurking, and try to make the game more productive. :V