Mini 1080 -- txtMafia -- Game OVER

[The Fonz]

I want to know why Kast has Fishy so low down on his scumminess list.

[The Fonz]

So, chamber said he was wary of voting KAst because too many others have been putting suspicion that way,

[The Fonz]

so instead he jumped the largest wagon. WTF?

[AurorusVox]

FtF, what do you make of Chamber's lack of explanation of his vote?

[Fishythefish]

Very little. It's the kind of thing I've seen him do as town in other games.

[Herodotus]

TF - I don't think you're paying much attention... which is something you called kinda scummy.

[Herodotus]

1876/1877 repeat a question I asked chamber.
You still have RF as scummy and are still voting him, without commenting on his recent postage beyond the claim.

[Herodotus]

And despite saying so, you haven't done anything to follow up re: K and c. You said probably one was scum, but have asked no questions/etc. to determine which.

[chamber]

Fonz, I already addressed that. If you don't like my answer then vote me for it, but don't repeat shit please.

[RayFrost]

Fonzy,

finish reading the thread before posting, please

. Also explain why you think Hdotus/Me/Fishy/Ah/Kast are scum if you don't mind.

[RayFrost]

I'd also be fine with links to previous posting that explains each.

[AurorusVox]

Actually, this addresses "why not kast with just one vote?", not "why RF to L-2?"

[chamber]

^ Your reading comprehension may actually be worse than TheButtonmen's, I'm impressed by this fact.

[AurorusVox]

You ONLY talk about kast in that post. Herod and TF's questions emphasised "why RF" rather than "why not Kast"

[chamber]

No, they actually both implied that votes are more meaningful than stated suspicions

[chamber]

and therefore I should be less willing to vote someone with votes on them than someone with suspicions on them. My post explains why I disagree. Read better.

[AurorusVox]

So you don't accept that votes indicate suspicion? Or that Herod's list (with RF @2nd) didn't indicate suspicion?

[chamber]

I'm now convinced that you didn't actually read my linked post.

[The Fonz]

Herod, I was away from the thread for two days, and I'm posting as I'm catching up. Nothing wrong with that.

[The Fonz]

On RF's play post-claim, I think it's better than pre-claim, and if he'd been playing like that all game, I wouldn't suspect him. HOWEVER:

[chamber]

I also don't think you read this either.

[The Fonz]

What was scummy about him was trying to fly under the radar, and you pretty much can't by definition fly under the radar as leading wagon.

[The Fonz]

So I'd expect both scum and town RF to start doing that to save his ass. It begs the question of why he didn't play like that before. Basically,

[AurorusVox]

My point was about this post, especially the use of the word "than" which suggests that the two things (votes and suspicions) are contrasted, i.e. not the same.

[AurorusVox]

RE: the linked post, I think you're putting a lot of emphasis on the word "sinister" which at first seemed to be a throwaway comment. Makes sense

if

emphasised.