Newbie 1038: Welcome to the Jungle! (Game Over!)

For Newbie Games, which have a set format and experienced moderators. Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
User avatar
Pinewolf
Pinewolf
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Pinewolf
Townie
Townie
Posts: 68
Joined: November 21, 2010

Post Post #175 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:24 am

Post by Pinewolf »

Woah, that's a lot of text. :O

I really got nothing to add to all this. I agree with the suspicion of DP, he's at the top my mafia list atm. With mirror not far behind. Lunatic's explanation sounds reasonable though i wonder about his last post. I'll wait to see brentm's response before i judge him more. I got nothing on tanstalus and Llama, except that they seem to know what they're doing. Though the small amount of posts makes it harder to get a read on them. VOT is lurking, stays number 3 on list. And king seems pro town, making a bunch of good posts with solid cases and good reasoning.
KingTwelveSixteen wrote: What does tbh mean?
It means: to be honest...
I can't believe you don't know this. :S
KingTwelveSixteen wrote: Also, anything can be interpreted as anything if you try hard enough
That's what i said at least 2 times by now and mirror kept saying i'm manipulating the truth...
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 421
Joined: November 25, 2010
Location: Lawrenceville Goargia

Post Post #176 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:54 am

Post by KingTwelveSixteen »

lunaticlucas wrote:
DavidParker wrote:Don't lynch lurkers, or something
I know this will probably end up looking bad in my case but, I've read a couple of games and some SCUM tend to lurk when they can.

And addressing the other game of mine you guys were talking about. It started the first day of San Diego Comicon, and it the biggest comic book convention in the world right now(if you didn't know) so yeah I kinda got distracted. The whole event lasts 5 days.

After that I got stranded on the side of the highway in the the desert for 8 hours so yeah I was not really in the mood to finish playing a game of mafia after that.

Not trying to make excuses just trying to get you to understand where I'm coming from.
Big tone change since last post.
lunaticlucas wrote:
Spoiler: LL's Post
Ok so here is a copy of my cheat sheet so far.

llamafluff: Town or a Very good Scum
Geotech: possible excuse for lurking
Very pro-town (seems to talk everyside of an argument not just his own)
Gets people to talk

DavidParker: Town?
Snarky
Sarcastic
Hilarious
Seems Pro-Town

BrentM: Town.
post 21
with no reason jumped onto a wagon
Noob
post 87
Implies I'm scum with pine. and that we talked privately even though I'm a replacement

Tanstals: ?
Staright Forward
Seems exp'd

MirrorIrorriM: Town.
Noob
Worries about early lynching
Thinks I'm trying to force myself into a leadership role

Pinewolf: Scum?
Manipulative
Non-Native Speaker (excuse?) maybe, maybe not
Seemed to jump on Vot For lurking

VOT:?
Seems to lurk
No real substence to posts

King: ?
Jumped on my band wagon quickly
After me for lurking


P.S. I am in no way trying to buddy up on anyone, if you think I am well I guess I can't do much but have you tell me why you think so and completely destroy your points.

P.P.S. When I say Noob that is also not an insult as I am a fellow Noob to this game.

P.P.P.S. Insults made by me are not to be taken seriously, I tend to make fun of people a lot, I mean no real disrespect.

P.P.P.P.S. Tell me why you think I'm scum and tell you why you are wrong. (mainly it's because you are not me)

P.P.P.P.P.S. Yeah five post scripts!!!! I challenge you all to beat that!
1. Seems to think DP is town soley due to being snarky and "hilarious".
2. Staright Forward? Seems exp'd? What??
3. Your notes are very short and basic, there is not much I can glean about your opinion from them.
4. Already responded to the bandwagoning on you.
KingTwelveSixteen wrote:...
BrentM wrote:- King hopped on the lunatic bandwagon pretty quickly
...
:( :oops:

Uh, actually I was going to
create
the bandwagon on him, but I decided that would probably seem really scummy and didn't do it. Looking back that was a mistake. Also a mistake was me not explaining why I was voting for him, so now I am: (explaining, not voting, though I'm doing that to.)
5. Why would you think we would think you were buddying someone? Also some of the old style lunatic creeps back in.
6. "I insult people, but it's ok because I don't mean it!" Yeah.
7. "EVERYONE WHO SAYS IM SCUM ARE WRONG AND I WILL TELL THEM SO."
8. I could totally beat that.
Oh yeah, and
UNVOTE
untill I decide who is the most scummy of them all.
Last edited by bv310 on Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Show
Win-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 421
Joined: November 25, 2010
Location: Lawrenceville Goargia

Post Post #177 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 11:55 am

Post by KingTwelveSixteen »

Crap. I was thinking that spoiler would put it in one of those clicky things so that it drops down. Sorry.
Show
Win-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
Goon
Posts: 163
Joined: November 22, 2010

Post Post #178 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:04 pm

Post by MirrorIrorriM »

King wrote:Tons of stuff he said
OK I don't know where to start to I will just cover them as I think of them.

You blame me for the "manipulating the truth" thing. That is a simple miswording. I got excited and started shooting out posts like a maniac. It is a simple miswording, I meant to say he was "manipulating the town". Manipulating the truth would be lying, something he never did to my knowledge (only thing he could lie about is the language barrier).

You question my accusation of Tanstalas tunneling DP. That was before I learned how great an accusation "tunneling" is. A better word would have been that he ACCUSED him right off the bat.

You question me for saying "I really had no idea that scum have a higher chance of surviving". Truth is, two people die every night, the chances of mafia dying would be quite high right? I didn't think about the fact that one of those people the mafia specifically exclude to kill each night. I really didn't think the game through that much until Llama called it out. Also when I say "I didn't think it through" know that it didn't occur to me at all. Call me an imbecile. :neutral:

You blame me for answering something someone else asked. Notice that I did the same when Pine asked about your avatar. :U I'm just that kinda guy, if I see a question I have any sort of an answer to, I spring for it.

At one part you have a string of 4 questions, they are:
1. Whats with the (lol)?
2. "Sounds like a panicking scum to me (might just be my newbishness though)." Trying to defend yourself from inevitible town flip?
3. Takes a cue from DP, also suggests me being scum-buddies with Pine.
4. Says he doesn't like DP pushing him to vote for Pine but does so anyway.

Answers:
1. I did the lol because I said "...hard evidence against my case against you". I just think it is funny how I repeated against. Like, I am against you for being against my case against those who are against - ect.
2. I honestly can't trust my own opinion in my first game of mafia. *shrug* It is just such a new experience, with me never playing a game like it, that I make assumptions very quickly and do not know yet how to read peoples reactions. To me that seemed like he was panicking. I was kinda hoping someone experienced would tell me if that is the nature of panicking scum and correct me if I was wrong.
3. I did NOT take a cure from DP when I voted for Pine. When I visit this thread, I read all the new posts, from beginning to end. About half way through them I saw stuff that convinced me that Pine was scum (him making excuses). So I had it in my mind to do so, however DP already said that people should go ahead and vote for him. It was a coincidence, one that I addressed actually when I said "I don't like you pushing me to vote for pine...Although I find this mildly suspicious, I was going to do it anyways so.". I said you are scum-buddies in a paranoid fit because you defended Pine.
4. Kinda covered by 3 but I'll answer it anyways. I Didn't like DP pushing me yes, but is that reason to not do so? If someone told you to look up the information to back this post I'm currently addressing, would you not do it? No you would still do it, because you PLANNED to do it anyways. I already had it in my mind to vote for Pine, DP just so happen to ask me to.

The accusation about my joke accusing Llama, while I was DIRECTLY blaming Pine for joke stuff: I was completely hypocritical in doing so I will admit. I really wasn't thinking. I have no excuse, I wasn't tired, I wasn't doing something else and was distracted, I just did something really stupid. I was thinking I would add a lighthearted air to all of this seriousness. You know, lighten the moment. So I decided to do it as a funny response to DP's post saying "So who is your scum buddy?" to pine. Unfortunately for me, the correlation between my joke and this post wasn't realized. As was latter addressed, my sense of humor is quite lacking. What I thought would be a nice funny touch completely failed and was misinterpreted.

Like I said before though. The accusation on you was made in a paranoid rage. :U I would be lying if I said I did it jokingly.
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
Goon
Posts: 163
Joined: November 22, 2010

Post Post #179 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:07 pm

Post by MirrorIrorriM »

KingTwelveSixteen wrote:Crap. I was thinking that spoiler would put it in one of those clicky things so that it drops down. Sorry.
I should probably use that spoiler thing for quotes from now on.

Just remember that the "spoiler" option makes text go like
this
.

"spoiler=" is like
Spoiler:
this.
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 421
Joined: November 25, 2010
Location: Lawrenceville Goargia

Post Post #180 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 12:33 pm

Post by KingTwelveSixteen »

MirrorIrorriM wrote:
KingTwelveSixteen wrote:Crap. I was thinking that spoiler would put it in one of those clicky things so that it drops down. Sorry.
I should probably use that spoiler thing for quotes from now on.

Just remember that the "spoiler" option makes text go like
this
.

"spoiler=" is like
Spoiler:
this.
Thanks!
@Mod: Can you edit it and get rid of the giant eye gouge of darkness please?


p.s. Mafia is so fun to play. Text walls rule. :D


Done.
~bv
Last edited by bv310 on Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Show
Win-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
Goon
Posts: 163
Joined: November 22, 2010

Post Post #181 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:13 pm

Post by MirrorIrorriM »

@King: Could you please give me your response to my post answering your accusations?
User avatar
lunaticlucas
lunaticlucas
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
lunaticlucas
Townie
Townie
Posts: 16
Joined: July 12, 2010

Post Post #182 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:20 pm

Post by lunaticlucas »

@king: As I said before the list, that is my cheat sheet for the game, so I can keep track of everything, not my general statement of people's character. I just wanted to let you guys see where I'm at in my thought process.
Just because I stand over you, Doesn't mean you understand me.
User avatar
tanstalas
tanstalas
Too Much Game
User avatar
User avatar
tanstalas
Too Much Game
Too Much Game
Posts: 2754
Joined: July 19, 2010
Location: Banned 4 lyfe

Post Post #183 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 1:46 pm

Post by tanstalas »

Wow, this game exploded... need to catch up
Pinewolf wrote:
Ok, this is starting to become pointless. I obviously won't change your mind, no matter what i say
. I responded to all the accusations multiple times and i really don't feel like repeating myself anymore. I'm not gonna respond to same accusations time and time again. Even if it's something from this very post...
I told you the best way to do this would be by making a case on someone else. Which I see is what you have been doing, kudos to you.
LlamaFluff wrote:Given what has been brough up recently, I like the lunatic push a bit more, especially after the meta that was dug up. Meta is metagaming, this means drawing what you see someone do from an old game, and comparing it to a current one. Its hard to do consistantly though, since people change over time and with not only alignment but role.
It is also extremely hard to do in this case since Luna has only made a total of 3 other posts in another game. I would hardly call that enough to get an accurate meta read off, but to each his own
DavidParker wrote:"I am a mafia goon"
QFT :D

You may have Llama fooled, but I am still liking you for a lynch, you will slip, oh yes you will...

Reading, still reading, liking Mirror more and more as I read his posts, he is definitely getting townie points
lunaticlucas wrote:
DavidParker wrote:Lynching someone for "lurking" or not contributing gets us where? Day 2 lynches/discussion will largely be as a result of the flip(town or scum) of the person who gets lynched on day 1 (and to a lesser extent the night kill), so an information lynch (on someone who is scummy) is more desired than a lynch on someone for lurking/not doing enough. They can be dealt with at a later time.
I know this will probably end up looking bad in my case but, I've read a couple of games and
some
SCUM tend to lurk when they can.
People have different outlooks when it comes to lurking, if you are actually referring to lurking and not flaking, in it by itself I do not think is justification for lynching someone, however if they only pop on once in awhile, say something noone really cares about or just parrots what other people say I would be down for a lynch, especially if they are being active in other games - however I agree with DP that this would only be from D2 onwards. The only downside to this is they may be trying to lay low as they have a cop/doctor role and are trying not to make themselves noticeable - for me this is when I will meta someone. Are they generally quiet or are they usually the post leader, what roles did they have when they were more active vs less active, etc. Since this is a newbie game most of you will have nothing for me to meta.. except for Llama and DP ;) I have only played one game with each of them, however Llama is to me seeming awfully quiet compared to when I played with him in SSBB. I will have to meta some of his games and see what is up.

My little rant over, I would like to point your attention to the bolded word "some" above.

@luna, when you said "some" what % of people would you say, to me "some" means less than 50%, and if that is the case why even bring that up? I am confused because the gist of that sentence to me means that you think that lurking is scummy, but you only use the word some, which would mean (to me anyhow) less than 50% - so that would obviously not be a good scumtell, and in fact if only some scum lurk that would mean the greater number of scum do not lurk, so lynching a lurker would actually lynch town more than scum? I hope you understand what I mean, and yes, I do want an answer from you.
DavidParker wrote:While some might not agree, i'd rather lynch someone who I'm 50% sure is scum but has been actively involved in wagons/day activities/had their own wagon go up and down throughout the day than someone who I'm 60% sure is scum on day 1 but has been lurking all day and not posted anything or been involved in any useful wagons.
I agree somewhat, it also will come down to a 'gut' feeling more often than not on a day 1 lynch, and also which flip will give me the most information based on their interactions from other people. Sometimes a day 1 lynch I have a slight feeling they will flip town but if they do flip town I will have a pretty good idea on who to go after the next day (if I am still alive anyhow) and vice versa if they happen to flip scum. Note: I will only do this if I really have no reads on anyone else. If someone seems scummy, I'm going after them.

King earns points with me for post #173 and 176


tl; dr - My views on people are mostly unchanged. Lunatic is ignoring all the advice given to him, he is still just posting little blurbs about who he thinks is scummy and town, though at least now he is giving reasons, however he is not scum HUNTING - seriously, look at posts pick them apart, analyze them and start asking questions - VOT, well, I don't know what to say, basically take everything I said above to Lunatic, apply it to yourself and add "I hope your activity level in this game improves - A LOT

Pine is starting to get there, but he still needs to do more until he is off my scumdar.
FlayTheScum 1:33 am
RC does not have my stash of animal porn, I promise you.
User avatar
BrentM
BrentM
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
BrentM
Townie
Townie
Posts: 55
Joined: November 24, 2010

Post Post #184 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:17 pm

Post by BrentM »

Ok, after reading through all of this I am starting to lean a little more towards Pine not being scum, he has explained himself as best as he could. But I still don’t like that VOT vote, that really confuses me, regardless of not wanting to be blamed for causing a hammer on lucas. That vote seems like the easy way out and worrying more about himself then about getting rid of scum.

I really like King’s posts, (I am having some of the same thoughts he has) and trust his analysis. If he is scum, bravo.

Mirror seems to making sure no one buddies to him and also seems to be doing some heavy scum hunting. This to me seems town.

DP is interesting. I agreed with a lot of his posts about not lynching lurkers, but some of them confused me. (not wanting someone to claim, and really trying to get the town to lynch Pine.)

I still don’t know what to make of lunatic. His early insults still make no sense to me. And he seems to only like David because he was snarky? As rude as I thought his insults were, I think if he were mafia he would’ve toned it back a little and it very well could just be his personality.

There is one thing that bugs me about Llama. He posted no opinions on David except to be more helpful then randomly declared that David must be town with no reasoning at all.(post #94) I don’t know if this means he is working with David, but I thought it was really strange.

Based on these thoughts, my top suspects are Pine (for that VOT vote) and Llama (for that David town claim) but I don’t have enough to give either one a vote.
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 421
Joined: November 25, 2010
Location: Lawrenceville Goargia

Post Post #185 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:05 pm

Post by KingTwelveSixteen »

MirrorIrorriM wrote:@King: Could you please give me your response to my post answering your accusations?
Man, I think my streak of huge posts has ended, 'cause I can't really find any huge gaping flaws or anything in your response. It seems perfectly believable and you explain why you did everything you did. The joke and you accusing me still seem scummy, but I could totally believe you made all those mistakes soley because you are new.

Ok, maybe I can do a play-by-play thing anyway.
Spoiler:
MirrorIrorriM wrote:
King wrote:Tons of stuff he said
OK I don't know where to start to I will just cover them as I think of them.

You blame me for the "manipulating the truth" thing. That is a simple miswording. I got excited and started shooting out posts like a maniac. It is a simple miswording, I meant to say he was "manipulating the town". Manipulating the truth would be lying, something he never did to my knowledge (only thing he could lie about is the language barrier).

You question my accusation of Tanstalas tunneling DP. That was before I learned how great an accusation "tunneling" is. A better word would have been that he ACCUSED him right off the bat.

You question me for saying "I really had no idea that scum have a higher chance of surviving". Truth is, two people die every night, the chances of mafia dying would be quite high right? I didn't think about the fact that one of those people the mafia specifically exclude to kill each night. I really didn't think the game through that much until Llama called it out. Also when I say "I didn't think it through" know that it didn't occur to me at all. Call me an imbecile. :neutral:

You blame me for answering something someone else asked. Notice that I did the same when Pine asked about your avatar. :U I'm just that kinda guy, if I see a question I have any sort of an answer to, I spring for it.

At one part you have a string of 4 questions, they are:
1. Whats with the (lol)?
2. "Sounds like a panicking scum to me (might just be my newbishness though)." Trying to defend yourself from inevitible town flip?
3. Takes a cue from DP, also suggests me being scum-buddies with Pine.
4. Says he doesn't like DP pushing him to vote for Pine but does so anyway.

Answers:
1. I did the lol because I said "...hard evidence against my case against you". I just think it is funny how I repeated against. Like, I am against you for being against my case against those who are against - ect.
2. I honestly can't trust my own opinion in my first game of mafia. *shrug* It is just such a new experience, with me never playing a game like it, that I make assumptions very quickly and do not know yet how to read peoples reactions. To me that seemed like he was panicking. I was kinda hoping someone experienced would tell me if that is the nature of panicking scum and correct me if I was wrong.
3. I did NOT take a cure from DP when I voted for Pine. When I visit this thread, I read all the new posts, from beginning to end. About half way through them I saw stuff that convinced me that Pine was scum (him making excuses). So I had it in my mind to do so, however DP already said that people should go ahead and vote for him. It was a coincidence, one that I addressed actually when I said "I don't like you pushing me to vote for pine...Although I find this mildly suspicious, I was going to do it anyways so.". I said you are scum-buddies in a paranoid fit because you defended Pine.
4. Kinda covered by 3 but I'll answer it anyways. I Didn't like DP pushing me yes, but is that reason to not do so? If someone told you to look up the information to back this post I'm currently addressing, would you not do it? No you would still do it, because you PLANNED to do it anyways. I already had it in my mind to vote for Pine, DP just so happen to ask me to.

The accusation about my joke accusing Llama, while I was DIRECTLY blaming Pine for joke stuff: I was completely hypocritical in doing so I will admit. I really wasn't thinking. I have no excuse, I wasn't tired, I wasn't doing something else and was distracted, I just did something really stupid. I was thinking I would add a lighthearted air to all of this seriousness. You know, lighten the moment. So I decided to do it as a funny response to DP's post saying "So who is your scum buddy?" to pine. Unfortunately for me, the correlation between my joke and this post wasn't realized. As was latter addressed, my sense of humor is quite lacking. What I thought would be a nice funny touch completely failed and was misinterpreted.

Like I said before though. The accusation on you was made in a paranoid rage. :U I would be lying if I said I did it jokingly.
^quoted for posteriety^

1. This seems
possible,
but it still seems a bit suspicious to me. (<==manipulating the truth thing)
2. Tunneling = severe, new people wouldn't know that, you get off from this one.
3. I have no idea if somebody would make that mistake about mafia being likely to survive and whatnot. Either of our two experienced-ish players (Not counting the one I am still suspicious of who hasn't replied to my post yet.) want to help with this one?
4. Lists within Lists!

4.a This seems silly, but it is super minor so I'm letting it go.
4.b You claimed newbie here, which is kind of obviously true, we are in a newbie game after all. :?
4.c You seem to misunderstand,
MirrorIrorriM wrote:...
@King I find you saying to "Lynch Lunatic first cause he's lurking" disturbing; scum-buddies with pine perhaps? Like DP said, if you lynch someone ACTIVE you can get much more conclusive evidence against them. Lurking helps find scum, it isn't a guarantee to my knowledge.
...
THIS is the cue I am talking about in this point.
4.d Good point about the planning stuff, I retract this accusation thing.

5. The joke stuff: You yourself acknowledge how it was hypocritical and a bad idea, and it just
feels
honest to me, as if you are town.
6. Paranoid and raging are not good conditions for playing mafia. :? See above point about honesty.
Show
Win-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall
User avatar
lunaticlucas
lunaticlucas
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
lunaticlucas
Townie
Townie
Posts: 16
Joined: July 12, 2010

Post Post #186 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:29 pm

Post by lunaticlucas »

I'm not trying to say all lurkers are scum, but what you are saying is that scum can pretty much a free pass on the first day if they lurk.
Just because I stand over you, Doesn't mean you understand me.
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
Goon
Posts: 163
Joined: November 22, 2010

Post Post #187 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:36 pm

Post by MirrorIrorriM »

Warning this post has been made really late at night. I might wake up in the morning and realize this is stupid or something, just be advised.


Well it seems all the heat for the Pine case has cooled down *shrug*. I tried to make you crack under pressure Pine, but you managed to stay cool whilst we thought you were at L-1. I really do not have any more evidence against you to continue my case. So for now:

Unvote


Preview Edit:
@ King in answer to him saying I answered 4.c wrong.

Me agreeing with DP is simply cause it makes sense in my mind. If you are at a court case and the criminal is sick, do you still arrest him? No, you try to hold the court on another day (unless he dodges it like crazy, then you force it). If someone is unavailable to make a case, and there are other cases going on with evidence behind them, wouldn't it make more sense to pursue those to get information?

And again if it need be addressed. My accusation against you was simply because I am being paranoid about this game. Your case against me seems too honest for me to really call you scum at all. [following text from your perspective] I mean this guy is making some steep accusations. He could be scum trying to get us to lynch some poor innocent townie! [/no longer in your perspective] It is an honest, well backed case. Although I have plenty of evidence to denounce* your accusations in an honest manner.

*Except the cases where I used an improper word or was joking and it was misinterpreted or claimed I did it out of being a newbie. No tangible evidence can be provided against that. For those cases you would have to weigh a mafia member's options and their advantages realistically. [in your perspective] What would he gain from lying here, what would he gain from claiming it as fluke? [/no longer in your perspective] I would have gained nothing (unless, again, there is some strategy I am unaware of) to help further my case. Therefore it must be a fluke.

Preview Edit 2:
Spoiler:
This is so going to be used against me if I become inactive later on. :lol:

@ Lunatic: Although it isn't a free pass sort of thing, I would think it would be more advantageous for the mafia to be active (or at least present) on the first day when the evidence is the most shakey. When the following days come there is more evidence to go around, meaning mafia want to be quiet so they don't say something to connect evidence (night kills, who they accused ect) to them.
User avatar
BrentM
BrentM
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
BrentM
Townie
Townie
Posts: 55
Joined: November 24, 2010

Post Post #188 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 7:05 pm

Post by BrentM »

Ok, Ive been thinking about this some more, and I think Pine and Llama are the scum team. Here is my case against them based on my opinions of Llama's posts
Sorry for typos, its late


- (post #45) follows his scum bud's lead, and votes for me to try and pull public opinion against me.

- (Post #50) Tries to convince King to vote for either me or DP (I mention this here because I think he was testing the waters on public perception of me).

- (post #52) Valid point, but he sure bashes my pine vote pretty quickly, not having bashed any other votes yet. I voted his scum friend, and he needed to make it look pointless

- (post #59) After mirror calls him out and public perception of my actions change, he probably realizes it might look like scum buds on a non scum vote so he quickly changes tactics, and lays low for a while.

** it is at this point that Llama seems to have picked a new target in Mirror (who just so happened to have voted for Pine in post #65)

- (post #83) Trying to get Mirror's heat off of pine and on to lunatic.

- (post #94) Random claim of DP being town, and now throws Mirror in the scum bucket with his buddy Pine. Gives Pine an out from some recent accusations, but yet still throws a town view to keep the image

- (Post #102) clearly tried to get Mirror to vote for lunatic again, now here he also claims he has finals and that he will address pine later.

- (post #141) After posting in another game thread all night (6 times after he said he would be away), he comes back to our game the next day and votes lunatic, the popular vote, while throwing an opinion out there that he doesn't like the pine voting going on.

Llama's actions to me just seem like something a really smart scum player would be doing. Protecting his newbie scum buddy, while trying to change public opinion on others (Mirror) and maybe force a lynch of an innocent. (Lunatic) I feel like I have enough evidence to do a vote, so I
Vote: LlamaFluff
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
KingTwelveSixteen
Goon
Goon
Posts: 421
Joined: November 25, 2010
Location: Lawrenceville Goargia

Post Post #189 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:09 pm

Post by KingTwelveSixteen »

BrentM wrote:...
- (post #141) After posting in another game thread all night (6 times after he said he would be away), he comes back to our game the next day and votes lunatic, the popular vote, while throwing an opinion out there that he doesn't like the pine voting going on.
...
:o If this is true then your theory could easily be correct!

...I can't check if its true right now due to unfamiliarity with the "search posts" function on this forum. :igmeou:
Show
Win-Loss Ratio
2-3 Town
1-0 Scum
0-0 Third Party
3-3 overall
User avatar
bv310
bv310
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bv310
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2834
Joined: November 14, 2009
Location: La Loche, Saskatchewan

Post Post #190 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:29 pm

Post by bv310 »

By god, I love you guys right now. I've never seen a Newbie game this active
. :D
User avatar
tanstalas
tanstalas
Too Much Game
User avatar
User avatar
tanstalas
Too Much Game
Too Much Game
Posts: 2754
Joined: July 19, 2010
Location: Banned 4 lyfe

Post Post #191 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 8:42 pm

Post by tanstalas »

lunaticlucas wrote:I'm not trying to say all lurkers are scum, but what you are saying is that scum can pretty much a free pass on the first day if they lurk.
No, what I am saying is I will most likely not vote them on D1 - unless in their lurky posts they slip, and I am actually hoping they get replaced before day 2 starts. That doesn't stop other people from lynching them though.

There is more than 1 scum in any game on D1, I'll look for scum, even if we have a lurker there is at least one other scum in the game and I will try and find him/her. If the lurker is still lurking D2 and hasn't been replaced, then they will make a good policy lynch :)
FlayTheScum 1:33 am
RC does not have my stash of animal porn, I promise you.
User avatar
lunaticlucas
lunaticlucas
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
lunaticlucas
Townie
Townie
Posts: 16
Joined: July 12, 2010

Post Post #192 (ISO) » Tue Dec 07, 2010 9:56 pm

Post by lunaticlucas »

@tanstalas: ok I see where you're coming from, and it make sense. But I'm still gonna be looking at all lurkers with a scum filtered lens until they prove in my eyes that they're town.

@BrentM: Your theory seems to be plausible, but I still need sometime to re-go-over all the posts and update my cheat sheet before I make my vote. I need to feel strongly that someone is scum before I vote, I still haven't even cast my first vote yet.
Just because I stand over you, Doesn't mean you understand me.
User avatar
BrentM
BrentM
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
BrentM
Townie
Townie
Posts: 55
Joined: November 24, 2010

Post Post #193 (ISO) » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:17 am

Post by BrentM »

KingTwelveSixteen wrote:
BrentM wrote:...
- (post #141) After posting in another game thread all night (6 times after he said he would be away), he comes back to our game the next day and votes lunatic, the popular vote, while throwing an opinion out there that he doesn't like the pine voting going on.
...
:o If this is true then your theory could easily be correct!

...I can't check if its true right now due to unfamiliarity with the "search posts" function on this forum. :igmeou:
If you click the username you can click search user's posts on their profile.
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
Goon
Posts: 163
Joined: November 22, 2010

Post Post #194 (ISO) » Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:55 am

Post by MirrorIrorriM »

BrentM you make a very excellent point. I would like to hear answers from you Llama.

Vote: LlamaFluff
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
MirrorIrorriM
Goon
Goon
Posts: 163
Joined: November 22, 2010

Post Post #195 (ISO) » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:03 am

Post by MirrorIrorriM »

MirrorIrorriM wrote:BrentM you make a very excellent point. I would like to hear answers from you Llama.

Vote: LlamaFluff
By the way, I counted 6 posts in other mafia games during his "finals" away session; none of which say he is going to be away in the other games. All of the posts are within 2 days and are less then a few hours apart; meaning he had plenty of time for uninterrupted posting. Whats the matter Llama? Is this game not working out for you?
User avatar
Pinewolf
Pinewolf
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Pinewolf
Townie
Townie
Posts: 68
Joined: November 21, 2010

Post Post #196 (ISO) » Wed Dec 08, 2010 5:46 am

Post by Pinewolf »

BrentM wrote:Ok, after reading through all of this I am starting to lean a little more towards Pine not being scum, he has explained himself as best as he could. But I still don’t like that VOT vote, that really confuses me, regardless of not wanting to be blamed for causing a hammer on lucas. That vote seems like the easy way out and worrying more about himself then about getting rid of scum.
I'm pretty sure I stated my reasons when i voted him. At the time it was lurking and trying to put a little pressure on him with it. But i have been observing the online people list these past few days and i haven't seen him online once, so it's not really lurking, but more like being away all the time. I think he would need to be replaced.

With that, the vote really has no strength.
Unvote

BrentM wrote:Ok, Ive been thinking about this some more, and I think Pine and Llama are the scum team. Here is my case against them based on my opinions of Llama's posts
Sorry for typos, its late


Spoiler:
- (post #45) follows his scum bud's lead, and votes for me to try and pull public opinion against me.

- (Post #50) Tries to convince King to vote for either me or DP (I mention this here because I think he was testing the waters on public perception of me).

- (post #52) Valid point, but he sure bashes my pine vote pretty quickly, not having bashed any other votes yet. I voted his scum friend, and he needed to make it look pointless

- (post #59) After mirror calls him out and public perception of my actions change, he probably realizes it might look like scum buds on a non scum vote so he quickly changes tactics, and lays low for a while.

** it is at this point that Llama seems to have picked a new target in Mirror (who just so happened to have voted for Pine in post #65)

- (post #83) Trying to get Mirror's heat off of pine and on to lunatic.

- (post #94) Random claim of DP being town, and now throws Mirror in the scum bucket with his buddy Pine. Gives Pine an out from some recent accusations, but yet still throws a town view to keep the image

- (Post #102) clearly tried to get Mirror to vote for lunatic again, now here he also claims he has finals and that he will address pine later.


- (post #141) After posting in another game thread all night (6 times after he said he would be away), he comes back to our game the next day and votes lunatic, the popular vote, while throwing an opinion out there that he doesn't like the pine voting going on.

Llama's actions to me just seem like something a really smart scum player would be doing. Protecting his newbie scum buddy, while trying to change public opinion on others (Mirror) and maybe force a lynch of an innocent. (Lunatic) I feel like I have enough evidence to do a vote, so I
Vote: LlamaFluff
I'd also like to know what's up with that last point. Though i don't agree with the first line of the post. The case seems strong, no denying that. But it has 1 flaw. I have not been discovered as scum. As a matter of fact nobody knows what anyone is. If you ask me, the case that you made seems to fit more for day 2 after a mafia member was lynched the first day and you're trying to find the connection to his partner in previous' days posts. I'm not saying it's bullshit or anything, it's solid, just that it only works under assumption i'm also scum.
Because the other option could be Llama is thinking of me as newbie town as opposed to DP who seems to think i'm newbie scum. Another option as well would be him having one of the roles, like cop or doctor and is thus trying to protect a player who he thinks is town while not posting too much as to not get a lot of focus to him.
I can see you only thought about it in one way. Which of course can be accounted to newbieness, but it could be the work of a mafia player who knows that both him and his partner are goons and thus trying to attack the fewer posting people hoping to somehow find the cop or the doctor.
Though that's just my understanding of the situation. I'm not trying to buddy with Llama or anything like that. I'm just stating the facts as they are. Again, i'm not saying your case has no value or anything, but that it's the type of case that actually has many different possibilities to it and which fits day 2 more.

So for now i also ask Llama to address me like he planned already.

But as much as DP's eagerness to lynch me has been forgotten and applied to his personality, i'm not really buying it. There was just too much of that. It seems far too suspicious....
I really might be overthinking here but it's the only thing i can say something about apart form agreeing with what was posted recently.
User avatar
BrentM
BrentM
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
BrentM
Townie
Townie
Posts: 55
Joined: November 24, 2010

Post Post #197 (ISO) » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:29 am

Post by BrentM »

Pine, Llama's actions are the reason for my theory. Your scrambling defense only makes me feel stronger about it. You can't keep playing the newbie card on me and no, I do not think Llama is protecting town.

Also, I read a game where DP was the doctor and aggressiveness is definitely his playing style.
User avatar
Pinewolf
Pinewolf
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Pinewolf
Townie
Townie
Posts: 68
Joined: November 21, 2010

Post Post #198 (ISO) » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:41 am

Post by Pinewolf »

Hmpf. Seems like anything i say even if it's meant as lighting all the options is simply thrown away and regarded as scrambling defense or paranaoid defense or sth. If we go by your logic it's suspicious how you defend DP in this last post. It could mean you and him are scum buddies. Same logic as with your case about me and Llama. And also let's not forget about that early post #24 of his. It's the same deal. I would also like if you point me to this game you're talking about.
Let the man speak on his own already. He doesn't need you and mirror answering my questions and accusations meant for him. It enables him to lurk around without having to answer anything. When i'll want you answering a question of mine i'll make sure it's a question for you, and not for DP.

I have played no newbie card on you. I have simply put light so many other options your theory can be seen as. If you wish to read it as a scrambling defense it's up to you. But it's been said many times that anything can be taken as anything if you believe in it. You seem to believe in your theory a lot. That's why i decided to show you the hole in your theory plus other options that are entirely possible.
User avatar
DavidParker
DavidParker
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DavidParker
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2441
Joined: May 30, 2010

Post Post #199 (ISO) » Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:53 am

Post by DavidParker »

I'm still pretty sure Pine is scum.

All his posts just aren't thought through using town logic.

Recent posts:
Pinewolf wrote:I really got nothing to add to all this. I agree with the suspicion of DP, he's at the top my mafia list atm. With mirror not far behind.
Oh cool. You just said the 2 people who were pushing your lynch the hardest are the two scummiest people in the game and are likely scum buddies. I would classify that as "flailing" around and getting a bit desperate. (It's a bit silly to bring up site meta, but that's just something that doesn't really occur, blatant support of scum buddies etc, although meta alone isn't really reason to explain why it's silly). It's silly because it's a huge OMGUS. You just stated the two people who are the scummiest are the two going after you and your reasoning is because the way we are pushing so hard for your lynch is scummy... Umm okay. That's silly.

It then gets better with your "non-town-like" posts:
pine wrote:VOT is lurking, stays number 3 on list.
Then your number 3 is a lurker who has done nothing. Firstly, your calling out the people going after you as scummy, then you throw down the "hey the lurker guy is scum!", which is just a typical deflection move that scum use on day 1 when they are under pressure. They want to try start another wagon or get people to notice someone else scummy sot hey highlight someone who has done something that's a slight scum tell (ie: lurking) and try push a case. But really, pushing this case doesn't help town. If you think VOT is scummy you would pressure him to post more and post more content, and ask him questions. Voting him and calling him a lurker does NOTHING. That is not pro-town behaviour.


Here's my favorite part:
pine wrote:And king seems pro town, making a bunch of good posts with solid cases and good reasoning.
I'm sorry. I actually chuckled to myself. I was actually going to respond to King's post and just tear it to peaces but I can see he's trying. (And I think he's probably town but due to different reasons to you, I just get a newbie town vibe from him). King's huge wall post was useless. What good points did he make or solid cases???
ALL king did was quote mass posts and explain what happened in a post by post format. That's useless. He just repeated what was in all the posts and posted nothing of substantial worth. Maybe there was 1 or 2 good points in the huge wall, but overall it was generally useless (apologies for the harsh words king, i know you seem new but that's just my impression of your post)
Seriously, go re-read his wall (173) and tell me how much of that was anything new or actual thought out opinions. It was just a commentary of what people said. Useless. Yet, you claimed he's town because of it.

Essentially, your posts don't show town-like thought and reasoning. Your town read on king is entirely off because he hasn't done anything in terms of useful scum hunting with solid reasoning and good cases. He posted a huge wall of "blah". If anything, I find him slightly town because he's making an effort and has done some newbie-town tells. But often, you'll find newbie-scums who play in these games by making mass wall posts responding and commenting on everything (kinda like king did) as their way of "scum-hunting" and seeming "pro-town". As it stands, I don't think king is scum but that's subject to change. I also partly think he's town, because I'm pretty sure you're scum and this just gives me the impression of scum buddying to town by calling his posts useful and solid reasoning etc etc.
pine wrote:I got nothing on tanstalus and Llama, except that they seem to know what they're doing
So i'm guessing one of these two is your scum buddy.





Now, addressing other people:

@Lunatic: (171 re: lurking), you're right. There is incentive for scum to lurk. Scum can easily lurk day 1 and avoid a lynch. I'm actually okay with this to a certain extent on day 1. I think it's slightly "dirty" play for scum, and not how I play scum simply because I'd rather actively try manipulate people, but that's just me. Lurking does take out the fun. I really look at lurking as a scum tell when you get down to LYLO. Also, it's better to just try pressure lurkers early on via questioning them + pressuring them to post more. As it is, we only have 1 lurker and we are still relatively early into day 1 so I'm not phased at all by VOT's lack of contribution. If he's lurker scum, I will figure it out soon enough in due time. I'm busy figuring out the rest of you for now :)

@King: i'd rather you actually analysed rather than commentated and posted huge walls of nothing (as stated in my above case on Pine). You point stuff out and make little comments, but don't actually look at what it means or look at incentives for these actions/posts and try come to conclusions of whether that person is scum.

@Brent: Do you really think Pine has explained himself as best he could? Sure he has explained himself and responded to accusations. But then he went out and made baseless accusations and statements that just aren't centered around town-logic/thought process.

Oh and I'm glad you read up on my doctor game Brent! :) Makes me feel happy someone saw that, and makes me find you more pro-town for actively looking for meta-resources. If you think Pine+llama are scum, why not vote for the bigger and more likely wagon, Pine?


@Pine: Oh dear, you just keep offering me more and more bait. You now suggest Brent and I are scum buddies? So basically anyone who attacks you is a likely scum buddy with me because I'm attacking you (the most), and if two people are attacking you they are scum buddies.. That's some poorly thought out reasoning.


Final point: I think it's more likely tanst is scum with Pine than Llama at this point. Tanst has stated how he's "slowly warming to pine being town" which seems silly from an experienced player. Pine has done nothing to show himself as being more town than before. All he has done is post more and respond to more accusations, but he hasn't done it well.

And here is the icing on the cake for this scum duo: Tanst "subtle" role fishing/speculation on llama. (I almost didn't bring it up but decided to bring it to attention, it wasn't strong, but it's definitely there)
tanst wrote:People have different outlooks when it comes to lurking, if you are actually referring to lurking and not flaking, in it by itself I do not think is justification for lynching someone, however if they only pop on once in awhile, say something noone really cares about or just parrots what other people say I would be down for a lynch, especially if they are being active in other games - however I agree with DP that this would only be from D2 onwards.
The only downside to this is they may be trying to lay low as they have a cop/doctor role and are trying not to make themselves noticeable - for me this is when I will meta someone.
tanst wrote:however Llama is to me seeming awfully quiet compared to when I played with him in SSBB. I will have to meta some of his games and see what is up.
This is bad. Bad anti-town posting. If you think llama might be a PR, keep it to your fucking self. I almost didn't bring it up, but chances are it was noticed by all including scum if you aren't scum. I know it's not really role fishing, but it is definitely suggesting that you believe llama to maybe be a PR.



TL;DR: Go read it. There's no cheats here.

Sorry for the long posts, I rarely do such long posts :/
"To die will be an awfully big adventure"

Return to “The Road to Rome [Newbie Games]”