@Vi:
You have quite a few posts that are exclusively you dealing with me. Seriously, it's 14 out of 88 posts, and it's even worse early on. If you count every post mentioning me, that figure doubles. What's up with that?
@Tanstalas:
Thanks for essentially restating a large part of my case on Gandalf, but you really went overboard trying to fish for the specific content of his role PM. I'm fairly convinced he's faking it though.
As an addition to the case though, how does this:
gandalf5166 wrote:I think I know what Vi's getting at.
not imply that he's a powerrole in any way, contradicting his VT claim?
gandalf5166 wrote:I actually just forgot about the question. That's what happens when you combine ADD with a strange propensity to read posts out of order. The way that he bothered to make it look like he had a case, but didn't go into any detail(crappy accusations with buzzwords like chainsaw defense are great too), makes it look like bussing more than pushing a mislynch, yes.
Ugh. You know which buzzword I hate most? Buzzword. It's always used as a very cheap way to try to discredit legitimate cases that happen to have some basis in established mafia theory.
VOTE: gandalf5166
inHimshallibe wrote:Choose one of the following, and I'll make it happen:
VP Baltar makes a post related to the game.
VP Baltar controls my vote the rest of the day.
That's awesome, if true. I'd probably lean towards the latter. It seems to me like he could provide a lot more commentary through votes, especially regarding changing reads, if applicable. Would he be able to do multiple votes and/or unvotes per post, as a way of communicating?