Mini 1095 - Fast Food Mafia - Game Over

Battousai · Post Post #300 (ISO) » Fri Dec 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Only have a little bit of time left today, so will respond quickly.

SC- I just got out of a game with Ythan and their two playstyles are similar and so I got the names mixed up. Even if scum have a fake name only, the vanilla pm posted will fill in the flavor as needed for a decent fake claim. Just don't see how you've decided to vote him for it as the difference isn't much and the WIFOM factor of it all is just off (if scum wanted flavor as well, they would have waited until someone was pushed to claim like usual).

EC- 1) The question is worded wrong either you wanted me to explain why, or you wanted the other players to guess as to why. 2) Why AntB? I did not mention others inhim slot, magua slot, and only snake (but that was to peanut trying to get his explaination not anything Snake really did that stuck out. Not to mention the fact that I said I would ignore two player slots actions until 1 scum is lynched (lewarcher/raj). I think what you tried to say in your own way (to make me look a bit suspect for not mentioning someone you are voting, IMO) is what my stance on AntB is. Well, I haven't really noticed blantant fence sitting from him (I don't believe you gave any links to reinforce your claims). It looks like he is more hesitant with his votes, which isn't that bad of a playstyle. If anything, I have a null read on him. He hasn't done anything scummy or was involved in anything big (ie miller claim and nameclaim).

StrangerCoug · Post Post #301 (ISO) » Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:21 am

I think I'm on the same page as Battousai now.

CooLDoG · Post Post #302 (ISO) » Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:42 pm

I'm back! Catching up.

CooLDoG · Post Post #303 (ISO) » Sat Dec 25, 2010 12:50 pm

@batt's 283... I should have clarified the comment, what I meant was:
I think it is not protown to not give information when asked, basically not answering questions. I do like your point on SC...

CooLDoG · Post Post #304 (ISO) » Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:03 pm

@AntB, do you know how wifom that last post is? Really you are gonna base my alignment on a wifom circumstance? You are correct about KFC being a big chain; I think they have "grease pits" in China now. Answer to the whole fence-sitting argument more/better.

I agree with mag's and Batt's reads on most people (with the exception of TSQ, duh). I would be willing to Vote AntB if posts don't start becoming more townish.

@TSQ, stop lurking. I hope some of you have noticed that he has dropped off the radar as of late (unless he posted v/la, in which case it is my bad)
@Choro, stop lurking.

AntB · Post Post #305 (ISO) » Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:19 pm

I'm just sayin, you roleclaiming KFC as easily as you did to me smells of scum. The fence-sitting argument was settled. So why bring it up now when you've had enough chance to previously.

StrangerCoug · Post Post #306 (ISO) » Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:02 pm

CooLDoG wrote:@TSQ, stop lurking. I hope some of you have noticed that he has dropped off the radar as of late (unless he posted v/la, in which case it is my bad)

I don't remember him posting after shifting my attention to you. Hmm...

Zang · Post Post #307 (ISO) » Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:50 pm

Votecount-

Chronopie - 1 - (Peanutman) (L-6)
CooLDoG - 3 - (AntB, Chronopie, StrangerCoug) (L-4)
AntB - 4 - (ragrhcpfreak, InHimshallibe, EtherealCookie, lewarcher82) (L-3)
Thestatusquo - 1 - (CooLDoG) (L-6)
StrangerCoug - 2 - (Battousai, Thestatusquo) (L-5)

Not Voting: Magua

7 needed to lynch

Deadline is January 4 at 3:15 pm EST

lewarcher82 · Post Post #308 (ISO) » Sun Dec 26, 2010 4:18 am

was peanut ever replaced? His last post dates to December the 17th... sorry, I am not paying enough attention to this game in the last days...

Ant, what are the reasons you find him scummy?

AntB · Post Post #309 (ISO) » Sun Dec 26, 2010 6:21 am

The main reason is he claimed FAAAR to easily then when questioned on it and repeated attempts to push all the blame on to me, saying I'm scum for "applying pressure" when I didn't apply any pressure of any kind.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #310 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:07 am

OK, back from the holidays. Will catch up.

AntB · Post Post #311 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:12 am

Good idea, you can justify your vote on me then other than wagon jumping.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #312 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:14 am

AntB wrote:Good idea, you can justify your vote on me then
other than wagon jumping
.

Oh... you wanted something else?

AntB · Post Post #313 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:28 am

...
UNVOTE: CooLDoG
VOTE: InHimShallBe

What changed your mind on ConfidAnon?
Your acting too.... shadowy(?)... You posts seem to be carefully constructed and deliberately built to reveal no information. There's also buddying with rajrhcpfreak and missing content on why you think chornopie is scum

inHimshallibe · Post Post #314 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:39 am

AntB wrote:...
UNVOTE: CooLDoG
VOTE: InHimShallBe

What changed your mind on ConfidAnon?
Your acting too.... shadowy(?)... You posts seem to be carefully constructed and deliberately built to reveal no information. There's also buddying with rajrhcpfreak and missing content on why you think chornopie is scum

Caught us one, boys.

Any other greasy, fried food you'd like to throw at the wall and see if it sticks?

AntB · Post Post #315 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:44 am

inHimshallibe wrote:
AntB wrote:...
UNVOTE: CooLDoG
VOTE: InHimShallBe

What changed your mind on ConfidAnon?
Your acting too.... shadowy(?)... You posts seem to be carefully constructed and deliberately built to reveal no information. There's also buddying with rajrhcpfreak and missing content on why you think chornopie is scum
Caught us one, boys.

Any other greasy, fried food you'd like to throw at the wall and see if it sticks?

... wut?!

You provide no evidence for your vote other than "OMG O_O Wagon!

" then dodge my questions.

AntB · Post Post #316 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:49 am

Also, I would chuck some fried food at you, but I ain't got no fryers.

CooLDoG · Post Post #317 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:01 am

@AntB, before I forget... I did NOT post my flavor quickly, I would suggest that you go back and read the game a bit more. It took you some time to fish my flavor out.

CooLDoG · Post Post #318 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:06 am

And saying that you applied no pressure what so ever is a slight stretch.

unvote, vote:AntB

.
YEp you got it here first, I'm switching my vote from the miller to AntB. Your posts don't make any logical sense and you lied about my flavor claim. Also to note you vote for little reason on page18. Honestly, you should be able to come up with better reasons for a vote then just "shady". Also mega role-fish. I suggest all of you re-read our exchange about me claiming my flavor.

CooLDoG · Post Post #319 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:08 am

that post got garbled slightly. second line "YEp" needs to be deleted.

AntB · Post Post #320 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:17 am

I'm LOLing here L-2 because of a wagoner and a guy trying to cover his own mistake...
If i get lynched, when I flip town CooLDoG and InHimShalliBe are scumbuddies.

@CooLDoG
All I said is if you want TSQs flavour so badly, reveal yours. Which you promptly did. No pressure at all. Btw, were only on page 13 so how can you reference page 18? Page 8 doesn't seem to match either...

inHimshallibe · Post Post #321 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:34 am

AntB wrote:I'm LOLing here L-2 because of a wagoner and a guy trying to cover his own mistake...

If i get lynched, when I flip town CooLDoG and InHimShalliBe are scumbuddies.

@CooLDoG
All I said is if you want TSQs flavour so badly, reveal yours. Which you promptly did. No pressure at all. Btw, were only on page 13 so how can you reference page 18? Page 8 doesn't seem to match either...

This particular bit gives me some reason to pause, though not enough.

So, listen, I gave all the necessary reasoning to justify my vote before I voted. Anything that you asked for after the fact is made invalid by the fact that you asked for it. I can go and derive something further on your potentiality to be scum, but right now I'm happy sitting on your wagon with some good folks and pushing you to lynch territory.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #322 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:36 am

Although, I

can

go a bit further on Chronopie, though that you specifically singled Chrono out gives him high potential to be a scumbuddy of yours.

AntB · Post Post #323 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:50 am

inHimshallibe wrote:
ConfidAnon wrote:
Unvote, Vote: peanutman
Jesus hell.

vote: ConfidAnon

Backtrack of AntB (agree with raj AntB is fishy as well), weak-ankled stances, and a completely terrible vote.

Let's lynch this one.

ConfidAnon, AntB, Chronopie, Tsq. Scumteam in thar.

That's all I can find against me from you, and that was LOOONG before your vote. I'm not going to deny my peanutman vote was bad, however I find it interesting you have peanutman as town purely based on that.

inHimshallibe wrote:[...]
peanutman - biggest point for this is AntB's vote on him
[...]
Chronopie - [mental note to flesh this one out in particular]
[...]

I calling you on your mental note, that's why I singled him out above all others

I'm also intrigued that me calling you and CooLDoG out as scummbuddies makes you pause... Now why would you pause on that part unless I have actually caught you out?

AntB · Post Post #324 (ISO) » Mon Dec 27, 2010 4:59 am

while I'm here

@CooLDoG
Second time at least I've said this.. show me where I've applied pressure. You also seem to be ducking out as soon as I make a point you can't respond to, then float up again later pushing it again, perhaps hoping I'll make a mistake you can take me to the butchers with. Just so you don't miss it if your skimming...

CooLDoG, show me where I've applied pressure to you and why have you now brought up my "fence-sitting" now when it has been discussed and cleared?