The curious case of
Benjamin Button
Singsinger
Man, the CC vs SS argument was tedious. Two major problems throughout though, first we have this
gem here where she states it doesn't matter if someone had scum motivation for asking her a question or not but she refused to answer a question to find out that motivation? Those ideas contradict because if she doesn't think it matters, what's the point of asking? That's the thing, throughout this argument I don't get the sense she actually does care about someone's alignment. This pattern repeats itself once again after the heated debate in finished, where she drops the whole case without a word till CC brings it up once again.
That's just weird man, here's the thing, SS was obviously emotionally invested in this argument shown
here but when you're that against someone and you think they're scum you don't just drop the case like that, especially when the majority of it she spent her time snapping back at CC with the whole
nononnonno you're misrepping me!
nonsense. The bottom line is, when you read her side of the debate it comes across as she's purely attacking for the sake of winning, but not because she's trying to evaluate and figure out CC's alignment.
The only thing I do like about SS is that she's active and spends a fair amount of her time attacking. But another thing is when she does question, this falls back into the same routine of vicious attacks. I originally liked how she questioned Gud shown
here but here when she does get her answers it's the same old thing again.
Snarky attacks where to the point at the conclusion it actually looks like she's trying to convince Gud himself that he should be lynched, I'm not even sure here if she even does think Gud is scum with the whole
hai guy it's liek so cool we have one mislynch
line.
Now onto Day 2, her
vote is awful. Exactly man, who does try to make an alliance with an Sk? You're berated her for being unorthodox, what is the scum motivation for this? Sure you did explain
later but what you're saying is fundamentally wrong. You're using words like
"unintelligible"
and
"unexperienced
as a method to discredit here. But here's the thing, CC joined this forum in 2007 so that shows can't even be bothered to get your facts right.
I love
this line,
Just because you claim something is omgus, doesn't make it true.
This is exactly what you just did to me right
here. You immediately attacked me and accused me of OMGUS as a method to discredit to, the hostility you've shown reads more as defensive scum because you don't have some giant case against CC, you weren't even confident enough in your vote to keep it over your V/LA with the whole
my vote is useless over V/LA!"
scene. Look at the last line of the last link in this post, this is a baseless attack. This is affront to discredit me when I was obviously just trying to get reads, communicating directly with people helps immensely with that.
tl;dr
Lack of genuine play, simply tries to win arguments as opposed to put an honest effort into reading people.
Hostile attacks consist of repetition of buzz words and the like to discredit her targets, this seems to be her MOI.
The sudden drop of the CC case, weak case on day two.
