Not going to be around for the weekend. At this point everything looks to hinge on Andy's decision. If you decide to lynch me, give me a chance to share final thoughts on Monday.
If anyone has questions, I'll get to them Monday.
Also @Kdub/Andy-an alternative for proving myself; send a vig kill at me and I'll redirect it to your designated target. If I'm lying, you'll kill me (you pick the vig).
There's several probable scum:
If it's 4x per color, then AGM, one of {Kast, MoI}, and one of {KageLord, NPIAU} are scum.
My flip would finger MoI
NPIAU's Hider claim interaction with Vi marks him as potential scum. It also conflicts with MoI.
KageLord claiming Yellow-pick says he is either Yellow or lying.
Tans Unlynchable + Odd Vig conflicts with Blue Brother making town vigs. Andy's PR also indicated Tans scum
KK claiming non-Blackest Night character. Also claiming to have a ring when the claimed character is not a lantern and does not have a ring.
We've got 1 Red, 1 Orange, 2 Yellows, and potentially 1 Black.
Red- probable AGM, Kage, or KK
Orange- probable NPIAU, MoI, or Tans
Yellow- probable MoI, Tans, or Kage
Black- probable KK or AGM
@Dana-
Removing your comment essentially protects KK's false claim. I can see if you're concerned that your comment makes KK's false claim less plausible, however, consider a parallel, if players are believing a false claim thanks to a mod error (ie. player claims double voter based on an incorrect vote count), you'd still have to correct that vote count and that would directly screw over the false claiming player. Using Tomar Re, instead of using an appropriate character for the series was an error that you already publicly stated (rightly so, since it misleads players who are less familiar with the flavor). The comment didn't directly impact the game and doesn't directly affect KK. But redacting it while KK is using that redaction as support for his implausible fake claim...that's a bit not so cool and more of a direct impact...