Mini 1112 - Mundania (Game Over)

DavidParker · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 8:59 am

Yeah; neither do I with the case I made on you.

quadz08 · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:41 am

Votecount 3.4

DemonHybrid (0)
sordros (0)
Jerbs (0)
ZazieR (3) sordros, Jerbs, DavidParker

<-- L-2

Bill McQuill (0)
DavidParker (2) Parama, DemonHybrid
andrew94 (0)
Parama (0)

Not Voting (2): andrew94, ZazieR, Bill McQuill

With 8 alive, 5 votes are required to lynch.

Deadline: February 7th

andrew94 · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 9:46 am

bill why did u unvote

Parama · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:38 am

Bill McQuill wrote:In this game, we put players at L-1 without acknowledging we're doing it/when they've just been replaced.

Unvote
.

Come on people, seriously?
Seriously?
It's be one thing to say "Even though Don's been replaced, I think I'm still good with a lynch because blah blah etc." But... I mean, I can't even... it's baffling. BAFFLING.

FoS: DavidParker
.

NO, VOTE YOU BASTARD. VOTE THE OBVIOUS SCUM.

Bill McQuill · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:14 am

Parama wrote:NO, VOTE YOU BASTARD. VOTE THE OBVIOUS SCUM.

You... you're not voting for the "obvious scum." Oh wait or are you trying to get me to vote for DavidParker? That I could get behind.

andrew94 wrote:bill why did u unvote

Is this a Kafka short story? I made it pretty clear why I unvoted.

DavidParker wrote:Yeah; neither do I with the case I made on you.

Wriggle, wriggle.

Vote: DavidParker

DavidParker · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:29 pm

Wriggle? Merely admitting to a mistake I made :/

ZazieR · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:30 am

Ugh, stupid internet. Can't read much more due to it >.< So for now, you guys will have to do with the interesting bits from D1 (And perhaps some things from D2?) (Though I might refer to it in my analysis later on, like a post from Jerbs)

Jerbs
Post 51
Which is why you voted Q21 at RVS, who had zero votes, over Andrew, who had 2 votes?

Bill
Post 52
Here, you make a comment that you’re not comfortable with Q21 and Jerbs just voting to join a bandwagon. Did this feel like it should be questioned to you and why or why not?

Post 89
This to me is a strange post. Here, you make a rhetoric question about Reckamonic being a hydra. But at post 108, you mention that you knew about the hydra account as you’ve played with it before. So why the rhetoric question here?
Also, you mention something along the lines of being uncomfortable again. Why didn’t you question those players?

Post 150
So why weren’t Jerbs and sordros mentioned? I’d also like to hear why you now point this out, while during D1 you were defending Stephen against the arguments about him fence-sitting and giving no opinions.

David
Post 76
Interesting you interpret this post as coming from scum, while keeping your vote on Andrew for policy. Want to tell why?

Post 111
Look, my previous comment is correct. You saw the comment from Jerbs as scummy, but rather kept your vote against Andrew.
And a question to you. What was the difference between Stephen and Jerbs at the point of post 77?

Post 160
Another time, Jerbs being mentioned as one of your scumpicks. Adding it as reinforcement for the above points.

DavidParker · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:30 am

Huh. I never wanted an Andrew policy lynch. I actually had no re-callation of "pushing" one. That was just how I decided to start this game it seems. I don't believe in policy lynches, however bringing up discussion over one to get the game moving was my intent there. I made some one-liners to attack Jerb because he made some ugly-posts. They were both scummy at post 77; I don't understand why you want me to post what the difference between them was. I decided Stephen was scummier than Jerbs, so when I unvoted from my discussion-starting-policy-lynch-talk I decided to vote Stephen over Jerbs. Jerbs hasn't done much to stay on my radar over past few days, others have been far worse.

sordros · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:11 am

I think I need to analyze this further, but the truth is Zazier doesn't ring as being as scummy as Don was. For the time being I will

Unvote

Bill McQuill · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Sun Jan 30, 2011 12:42 am

ZazieR wrote:Did this feel like it should be questioned to you and why or why not?

What?

ZazieR wrote:But at post 108, you mention that you knew about the hydra account as you’ve played with it before. So why the rhetoric question here?
Also, you mention something along the lines of being uncomfortable again. Why didn’t you question those players?

What?

(Also: this "mention" you speak of was pretty clearly contextual sarcasm, given that I haven't been on this site in almost a year.)

ZazieR wrote:I’d also like to hear why you now point this out, while during D1 you were defending Stephen against the arguments about him fence-sitting and giving no opinions.

What?

I mean yeah, I'm being a little glib, but I seriously can't parse what you're getting at in two of these three questions.

---

DavidParker wrote:Wriggle? Merely admitting to a mistake I made :/

Appealing to emotion, gotcha.

sordros wrote:I think I need to analyze this further, but the truth is Zazier doesn't ring as being as scummy as Don was. For the time being I will

Unvote

I mean, were you expecting ZazieR to come in and quickhammer somebody? Why won't anyone in this game even try to pull their weight?

andrew94 · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Sun Jan 30, 2011 11:08 am

DavidParker wrote:Huh. I never wanted an Andrew policy lynch. I actually had no re-callation of "pushing" one. That was just how I decided to start this game it seems. I don't believe in policy lynches, however bringing up discussion over one to get the game moving was my intent there. I made some one-liners to attack Jerb because he made some ugly-posts. They were both scummy at post 77; I don't understand why you want me to post what the difference between them was. I decided Stephen was scummier than Jerbs, so when I unvoted from my discussion-starting-policy-lynch-talk I decided to vote Stephen over Jerbs. Jerbs hasn't done much to stay on my radar over past few days, others have been far worse.

how come u said 'copied and pasted vote andrew'

DavidParker · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Sun Jan 30, 2011 7:51 pm

It was a joke/sarcasm?

Game hadn't started (in confirm stage), so I joked how I was already prepared to "paste" the vote andrew part into a post as soon as game started.

Jerbs · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:29 pm

@Z

Yes. bandwagoning during rvs is a good way to get out of it and put pressure on someone

Requesting replacement. I'm expecting 20 inches of snow soon, and I'm sick, and I'm in too many games at once. Sorry

Parama · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:43 pm

MOD: There's a chance my power may go out soon due to freezing rain, so consider me V/LA for the next 4 days. I'll keep posting if I don't lose power, of course.

sordros · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:15 pm

Bill McQuill wrote:
sordros wrote:I think I need to analyze this further, but the truth is Zazier doesn't ring as being as scummy as Don was. For the time being I will

Unvote
I mean, were you expecting ZazieR to come in and quickhammer somebody? Why won't anyone in this game even try to pull their weight?

What's with the attitude? I feel scummier vibes elsewhere, for example, I'm ready to

VOTE: DavidParker

I really doubt you would go read another game to use as reference here, and didn't manage to bring the right information from it.

quadz08 · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:00 pm

Parama's V/LA is noted.
Searching for a replacement for Jerbs.

Votecount 3.4

DemonHybrid (0)
sordros (0)
Jerbs (0)
ZazieR (2) Jerbs, DavidParker

Bill McQuill (0)
DavidParker (4) Parama, DemonHybrid, Bill McQuill, sordros

<-- L-1

andrew94 (0)
Parama (0)

Not Voting (2): andrew94, ZazieR

With 8 alive, 5 votes are required to lynch.

Deadline: February 7th

quadz08 · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:47 pm

Surprise_Carcinogen replaces Jerbs.

Surprise_Carcinogen · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:06 pm

Yep, going to go read back and see what sort of feeling I get, but hello everyone!

Quick question, anyone can answer: Is it 5 votes to drop hammer, or 5 votes is enough for a lynch if the time runs out? Because if 5 counts for a hammer-ish majority, someone should back off unless we're running low on time, cause we're one vote from a death.

DemonHybrid · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:06 pm

5 votes are required for lynch, and David is at 4.

DemonHybrid · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:07 pm

Unvote

You should have your say and read. I will put my vote on David again when it comes time for it. He hasn't looked any more town.

Surprise_Carcinogen · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:08 pm

oh, and /confirm

Surprise_Carcinogen · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:15 pm

Thanks. I'll do my best, since I've never subbed in before, and I'm leafing through now.

andrew94 · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 6:21 pm

why david

DavidParker · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:03 pm

Why what?

Jerbs wrote:Yes. bandwagoning during rvs is a good way to get out of it and put pressure on someone

This sums up why I was going to push a wagon on you for no reason early on.

Bill McQuill · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 7:07 pm

sordros wrote:What's with the attitude?

"What's with" the attitude is that you've made 11 posts now in this game, not once of which has been a useful contribution. For reference, quadz is sitting on 25 posts. You have posted half as much as the Mod.

The reason you just gave for voting David is preeeeeeetty paltry.

That said, I don't think there's been a cohesive case made against anyone since possibly Day 1, so I'm going to sift through his posts from the game and come back in a bit with a strong bit of wisdom.