Newbie Game 1058: Murder in Bitville! (OVER!)

Kcdaspot · Post Post #175 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:33 pm

All hopps has done is just agree with everyone.

mothrax · Post Post #176 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 3:40 pm

Sure, KCD, though there is a link in my first post to the wiki page...

L-[number] is the lynch threshold... (I.E. l-1 is one vote needed to lynch some one)
IioA-Information over Analysis
OMGUS-Oh my god you suck- typically referring to a player voting someone because that someone is voting for them.
those are a few of the important/frequently used ones....
oh, fos=finger of suspicion. a weak vote placeholder imo. "I am suspicous of you, but not enough to vote you.

tylerjarvis · Post Post #177 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 4:23 pm

Holy. Crap.

In the past 2 hours, you guys have added like 4 pages of content.

My top scumread is still Cirno. Second would be shot.

Mist strikes me as a flip-flopping newb more than anything else. The flip-flopping is super annoying, but... it's a town kind of annoying.

And yeah, I'm in Abilene TX and we're getting some of the strangest weather. This afternoon, it was 72 degrees and sunny. Then it started hailing. At some point tomorrow, we're expected to be at 9 degrees. We're also supposed to get snow tonight. That's not game related, but you guys were talking about it.

That shouldn't affect our lynch deadline though.

Hazard with a Glove · Post Post #178 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:03 pm

UNVOTE Vote: Shotty

. I'm still going to keep a close watch on Cirno, but shotty apparently has played 59 games, but couldn't remember he said Mothrax was scum. Right.

Cirno · Post Post #179 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:14 pm

Because the number of mafia games played correlates to how well you remember things.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #180 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:21 pm

The point being that this is not his first rodeo.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #181 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:22 pm

with that V/LA starts now. I pray that i can get on tommorow.

Cirno · Post Post #182 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:28 pm

Kcdaspot wrote:The point being that this is not his first rodeo.

All the more reason to believe he wouldn't resort to such a thing.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #183 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:29 pm

Hazard with a Glove wrote:
UNVOTE Vote: Shotty
. I'm still going to keep a close watch on Cirno, but shotty apparently has played 59 games, but couldn't remember he said Mothrax was scum. Right.

Well if you read the thread dummy I didn't say he was scum!

Hazard with a Glove · Post Post #184 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:43 pm

drmyshottyizsik wrote:I think Morthax is scum who is trying to hide behind the fact that he is an IC, or he is town and a terrible IC.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #185 (ISO) » Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:59 pm

EXACTLY! LOOK AT THE WORD OR! He is a first time IC.

Hoppster · Post Post #186 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:35 am

@ Mist: Regarding the '2011' - if I got banned but re-signed back up as Hoppster2011, I'd be likely to be investigated and banned again.

Kcdaspot wrote:VOTE: hoppster

I have never seen a fluffier ISO for page 4-5

Kcdaspot wrote:hoppster and shotty are scum.

hopps for fluff

shotty for that last post.

<snip>

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Shotty

Kcdaspot wrote:All hopps has done is just agree with everyone.

Completely confused by all that. What do you mean by fluff? If shotty and I are scum, what exactly does unvoting me to vote him achieve? And me just agreeing with everybody didn't happen, if you refer to page 4 (which was one of the pages you called me out on for my 'fluffiness').

mothrax wrote:Will everyone please list there top two suspects with reasoning? I will even start.

1)Mist: Vote hopping, trying to blatantly buddy.

2)DMSIS: discrediting the IC, pushing a suspect with no vote or reasoning.

I actually agree more with the recent analysis by tylerjarvis of Mist being a newbie.

UNVOTE: Mist7676
As such, I think the buddying attempts are almost more of an attempt to be popular than get any result. Or, simply, just joke votes for humour.

@ DMSIS: I'm still confused about your initial vote on Cirno. At worst, it was a Freudian slip by scum, but even then basing a vote just on that is ridiculous when it could just as easily be a typo.

@ Mist: What are your (serious) thoughts on scum? (I don't want a joke reply, please.)

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #187 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:02 am

I thought Cirno claimed scum out of anger. That is all

Cirno · Post Post #188 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:05 am

KCdaspot is using the blizzard as an excuse not to post. Keeping my vote where it is.

drmyshottyizsik · Post Post #189 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:11 am

The blizards no exucse unless you have satelite interwebs.

CrackHead · Post Post #190 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:02 pm

/confirm for replacement

Hazard with a Glove · Post Post #191 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:56 pm

Cirno&Shotty are obviously scumbuddies.

The storm is fine reason to not post it's quite easy to loose power in it, I'm getting hit like s***, and doubt I'll even be able to get on my computer let alone my internet.

Cirno · Post Post #192 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:00 pm

Hazard with a Glove wrote:Cirno&Shotty are obviously scumbuddies.

The storm is fine reason to not post it's quite easy to loose power in it, I'm getting hit like s***, and doubt I'll even be able to get on my computer let alone my internet.

Problem is, he went v/la before the storm even hit, made huge deal about doing so, and you and I, who are also getting hit by the blizzard, are posting fine.

Mist7676 · Post Post #193 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:19 pm

Well my thought on real scum is. Cirno. She was pushing the lynch on my but after looking at her ISO she also called me scum and before she was buddying with me. She was trying to get me vote on Mothrax. And hoppster Thanks now I get it.

Cirno · Post Post #194 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 1:31 pm

When exactly did I buddy with you? When exactly did I try to get you specifically to vote Mothrax?
You make no sense.

Hazard with a Glove · Post Post #195 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 2:54 pm

Cirno wrote:
Hazard with a Glove wrote:Cirno&Shotty are obviously scumbuddies.

The storm is fine reason to not post it's quite easy to loose power in it, I'm getting hit like s***, and doubt I'll even be able to get on my computer let alone my internet.
Problem is, he went v/la before the storm even hit, made huge deal about doing so, and you and I, who are also getting hit by the blizzard, are posting fine.

Yes, because power outages happen as soon as a storm hits and in ever square mile the storm affects.

Cirno · Post Post #196 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:02 pm

I see. Then you are saying that Kcdaspot predicted that there would be a power outage in his specific area?

Hazard with a Glove · Post Post #197 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:33 pm

Cirno wrote:I see. Then you are saying that Kcdaspot predicted that there would be a power outage in his specific area?

No, I'm saying that he said he thought it'd be likely there could be a power outage.

Cirno · Post Post #198 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 3:42 pm

And I'm saying that he deliberately overreacted by going v/la so he wouldn't have to post.

Either way, this isn't an issue that is going to get him lynched, so it really isn't worth going back and forth over it.

Kcdaspot · Post Post #199 (ISO) » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:23 pm

CANCEL V/LA

My internet still works mfw.

Hoppster wrote:
Kcdaspot wrote:VOTE: hoppster

I have never seen a fluffier ISO for page 4-5

Kcdaspot wrote:hoppster and shotty are scum.

hopps for fluff

shotty for that last post.

<snip>

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Shotty

Kcdaspot wrote:All hopps has done is just agree with everyone.
Completely confused by all that. What do you mean by fluff? If shotty and I are scum, what exactly does unvoting me to vote him achieve? And me just agreeing with everybody didn't happen, if you refer to page 4 (which was one of the pages you called me out on for my 'fluffiness').

you have posted up to that point nothing but fluff. it's getting better though. now make a case.

Shotty did something scummier than fluff posting so i switched.