WROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONGsilvascum wrote:You snap on to ICE right away in RVS, single-mindedly focusing on him because he suggested massclaiming, an idea everyone was behind for obvious reasons.
1) My vote wasn't RVS, as I stated.
2) GreyICE suggested massclaim in post 6. Snake voted ICE in post 7 and said that was scummy. Espeonage posted in 8 & 9 and ignored the issue. Post 10 was GreyICE reenforcing the massclaim idea, and Post 11 was my vote on him. EVERYONE WAS NOT BEHIND THE IDEA. ONLY TWO OTHER PEOPLE HAD POSTED BESIDES ME AND ICE AT THE TIME, AND THE ONLY ONE OF THEM WHO COMMENTED ON THE MATTER SAID HE WAS AGAINST IT.
If it's a "but whatever" thing then why are you even attempting to use it against me.silvascum wrote:Then you snap on to Thingy for using terminology from another site, which I thought was kind of obviously not scummy, given he uses the same terminology in the sign-up thread, but whatever, you dropped the case real quick.
Haylen's joke post wasn't obviously a joke, you twat. Mine was. I even said MINDLESS SHEEPING LOL in the post. And tell me how my inability to read someone else's joke post at all relates to my ability to post a joke post. LOGIC NOT FOUND. SCUMPOINTS RISING RAPIDLY.silvascum wrote:Still don't get why you voted Emp, as your vote for Emp looks like a joke post, but since you're incapable of seeing other people's joke posts, I can't comprehend the idea of you making a joke post of your own. It just doesn't seem possible.
OH MY GOD IT'S LIKE DRMYSHOTTYIZSIK GAINED A VOCABULARY BUT RETAINED HIS IQsilvascum wrote:Then, of course, you leap straight off Haylen and on to Kise for what could very well be a total misunderstanding.
Read what I fucking said above about Kise. His entire goddamn case on me is built on this strong idea that he knew, BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT, that I
knew
the setup. That's a pretty DAMN STRONG PIECE OF EVIDENCE to be 'misremembering'. It's not even a misunderstanding - WE NEVER SPOKE ABOUT THE GAME PERIOD.Listen,silvascum wrote:The point is, every one of your cases so far is based on a single piece of misinterpreted garbage, with the exception of Emp where you were just bandwagoning. I see nothing town about any of that.
[removed -
.Sens
]Nothing about my case on Kise is about a misinterpretation. It's based on a bold-faced lie, so you can drop that one.
My vote on ICE was a misunderstanding.
And my vote on Haylen? I'm still holding to it, so you can just drop that charade too, because even if you believe she was 100% joking, I don't think the intent is there.
No. I based my assault on GreyICE off the NORMAL MO FOR MAFIA GAMES which is that MAFIA HAVE NIGHTKILLS. I didn't say I misremembered - I never knew there weren't nightkills in this game. That is a completely different scenario, and if you misrep me again so help me god I'm going to lose the last bit of civility I'm trying to maintain to refrain from getting modkilled.silvascum wrote:You have based the ENTIRETY of your assault on GreyICE the first day on the fact that you supposedly KNEW FOR SURE that GreyICE knew there would be nightkills… it was the MOTHERFUCKING CRUX OF YOUR CASE… and you want us to be willing to just write it off as 'lol i misremembered'?
It wasn't fucking humorous. If she was going to try and be blatantly fucking humorous, then why the FUCK did she bother to give TOWN, NEUTRAL, AND SCUM READS ON PLAYERS? You don't fucking do that if it's funny. The claim was the only obvious joke part of that post, and it has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE REST OF HER POST.silvascum wrote:...Or she wanted to make a humorous entrance, so she makes an obvscum joke post that's obviously a joke? No one else is taking it seriously, in fact two other players commented on how funny it was, proving that other people realized her intro post for what it was; a humorous joke.
And since you're going to insist upon it, sources:
You are taking my attempts to scumhunt and launch assaults against players I find scummy… and instead of viewing them in that light, DELIBERATELY trying to show them as "Why are you so desperate for a lynch?"silvascum wrote:lolwut? Please explain.
That question is so many levels of mind bogglingly retarded and idiotic that I can't even begin to respond to it.
[removed -
Sens
]
