New Designer Mafia (Victor(s) are crowned)

[WhenInRome]

Hi guys So we're claiming our sent roles? Fine with me!

Tattletale: Can watch mafia night meetings, if he chooses to do so. However, has a 50% chance of getting caught and killed.

Cultist: Can drink the kool-aid at night. (Kills him)

Silencer: Can delete one post per day.

EBWOP: But I feel no need to let scum know precisely what the roles I submitted can do.

They may be very useful...

Well, it's semi-open, so your role could not be in the game, or it could be a third-party/scum role (alignments weren't allowed to be sent in)

[WhenInRome]

Wow, sorry I haven't been that active

But Olinea, what was your reason for bolding "Detonate"? It's like going into a mall and shouting "DEATH TO AMERICA!", then walking away calmly. It serves no purpose and just makes everyone confused and call the police (in this case, ready the noose).

Vote:Olinea

[WhenInRome]

Did anyone notice this?

also I was the one sending the Yosarianite role

Lets do this and everyone sould answer this: DID YOU SENT A ROLE THAT COULD MESS WITH VOTING?

I DIDNT

. Xalxe, could you help me here with your previous compilation?

That was from populartajo. Why would he claim to have sent in a role that messes with voting, then later say he didn't?

UNVOTE

FOS:Olinea

VOTE:tajo

Because the detonator case is gone with Furcolow's vote.

[WhenInRome]

WhenInRome
His 126 stinks. It doesn’t sound like he thinks Olinea detonated the bomb – more like he did something weird, and that that justifies the vote. His vote in 272 is based on a contradiction from tajo that doesn’t exist – what tajo is clearly asking for is whether any submitted roles other than Yosarianite that could explain the votecount anomaly.

Woops, I didn't realize that. Sorry. *blushes*

UNVOTE:

Also, did anyone claim they submitted post bomber? We should really confirm ender's role.

[WhenInRome]

WhenInRome's Question: Who is scum and who is town? No less than two suspects per, please.

Well, Furc seems scummy to me. Mostly because he only seems to do anything if the town wants him to do it. It's also just a gut feeling, which can be very powerful. DeathNote is my other scum read. I want clear answers, not some bullshit riddles that seems like it should be on an Egyptian tomb: "The gods admire your desire for this treasure, but you are trying to make this too easy for you. I will not reveal the map until the three stones are placed in the Gateway."
For town, I'd say Plum and Oli. Plum seems to be actual scumhunting, not just pseudo-scumhunting. Oli has a confirmed role (well, it could still be scum, but he's the only clear (speaking of clears,did anyone submit the post bomber role?))

P.S. I can't watch videos, as I have an extremely old computer that should be in a museum. So don't ask me anything important in the videos, okay?

[WhenInRome]

Sorry all, I've been busy. I'm rereading, my thoughts will come later.

[WhenInRome]

Okay, I'm going to:

VOTE:ender

So he votes someone he doesn't think is scum, then unvotes 15 minutes later. Then, when Xalxe says he needs to scumhunt more, he immediately FOSes him, using a reason previously used by IS? That reeks of scum. Also, he basically admits he doesn't have any good reasons: "If i find more reasons i'll be sure to vote you." So you vote someone to kiss up to IS, then he unvotes a few minutes later, and then he FOSes Xalxe because he told him to scumhunt more (using a half-assed reason, also) Xalxe is my SMPOFOS (small part of finger of suspicion ) because while he did use a lot of tables and surveys, he's gotten much better, and they did keep the town organized.

Anyway:
ender: why did you do what i described above?
xalxe: who are you current town/scum reads?

P.S. I hate meta. If someone plays scummy as town, I'll lynch them. I don't care if they always play scummy, or always sheep. Sure, you could be town who plays badly, but we don't know that. You could be scum using that excuse to get votes off you. Also, if you play so baldy, you're not helping the town, which is "anti-town" playing, even if you're town. So please, don't use meta as an argument to get me to vote/unvote someone.

[WhenInRome]

Wait, is there a jester role? Because ender just seems so obvious, I can see him being a jester.

[WhenInRome]

Well, after rereading again and again, (I was bored, okay?) I see the case behind Xalxe being scum. And since there is a jester role, and 3rd-party roles can sometimes end games if they win, I'll:

VOTE:Xalxe

[WhenInRome]

Yeah, the "jester ends game" thing comes from another site, where it's called the fool. I realized that's probably not how it works here, (those games are fast chat-room style) so that was a bad reason. Since I really don't want to keep my vote on someone for a horrible reason (I was afraid of jester), and since Furc seems to be contradicting himself far too often (and since he's just realllllyyyyy scummy), I'll go with a vote that isn't driven by 3rd-party fear (damn you and your stupid bell-hat!)

Mod: Can you confirm if there are 3rd-party roles?

[WhenInRome]

I'm back! Day 2 went by so quick I didn't realize it started...but anyway, DeathNote is my scumread. Cryptic answers, bad play, and quick hammers make for the 100% guarenteed mafia! (Scum role on death or get your money back!)

Vote: DeathNote

[WhenInRome]

DeathNote, are you STILL not going to respond to ANY point against you?

[WhenInRome]

I'm not feeling the DemonHybrid wagon either. I won't be joining it unless something changes.

[WhenInRome]

WIR, why the hell did you target me yesterday?

I don't know. I didn't have anything important to talk about, so I picked randomly. Same thing with day 1.

[WhenInRome]

Also WIR needs to fucking explain why did he target me with that scummy ability yesterday.

How the fuck is my ability scummy?

[WhenInRome]

jesus christ abilities do not alignment imply
wtfrageeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Since it makes no sense NOT to claim, I'll claim:
Porn star (weird name, amirite?) You can pick someone every night, and open a QT with them. But, anyone investigating me or the chosen will be found guilty. Sided with the village. Cool, you submitted that, right? Can you confirm that's what it does?

[WhenInRome]

Cooldog, can you confirm that is what the role does? You mentioned that you didn't want to say before.

...Seriously?

SO it is in the game,

yup that's my role

. I think I should have named it prostitute instead, but its a work in progress. I don't think its a half bad role. I'm really wondering about your choices though, very odd.

(Emphasis added by me)

[WhenInRome]

Welp, I do like the wagon on DN, but I'm not voting just yet because I'll probably destroy the space-time continuum or some shit. In other news, I've got an orange pill! Should I take it?

[WhenInRome]

Let's hope I don't get addicted!

*swallows pill*

[WhenInRome]

Hang on, am I supposed to be told what that pill did? Nothing's happened...

[WhenInRome]

Ya know what, let's take the risk, and

VOTE:DeathNote

[WhenInRome]

It told me that there is a role that can target another person. They will know what happened to them, but not who did it.

[WhenInRome]

We'll see soon enough, when Llama gets here...

FEAR THE LLAMA

[WhenInRome]

I like the zajnet wagon as well. I QT'd with Amrun, where he made the case against Zaj.

Oh, and Sevei got my role :O (Once per day, could delete a post from the game)

[WhenInRome]

I bring messages from DH, before his death. (He gave me a message in case he died)

"Tell them to watch out for Admiral. Ribwich was a lurky fellow and I don't like Admiral's play. He would be my next lynch.

Amrun needs to get Chess and colldog's asses into gear for the next few lynches.

If IS is still alive, he's very likely bulletproof*."

*IS was his target.

[WhenInRome]

and WIR but he no die

...You tried to kill me?

[WhenInRome]

I agree with the Tasky lynch.

Vote:Tasky

[WhenInRome]

fair enough. I know in the game I was modding Fishy had some personal stuff come up. He hasn't flaked on me in the past, so I give him the benefit of the doubt.

VOTE: Tasky

OMG! you just hammered me.
You could have waited for the post I was just writing.

BAH!

Go town.

Is it just me, or is he just making an excuse to not post? Especially since he's at L-1, not hammered...

[WhenInRome]

No objections here! Here's the ceremonial ASCII hammer:


=============[HAMMA]

[WhenInRome]

Yay for random unexplained votes!

[WhenInRome]

But also WiR, yes. Lurking and a fool-proof excuse to come up "guilty" to investigation.

Well, I was lurking because I had two different games on (one at another site, one here), but I /outed of both of them. Don't say I never did anything for you

And I can't provide a defense for the "coming up guilty" thing. It's the role I got, and I realize how scummy it looks. If you want to lynch me because of that, I'll understand.


I talked to Fishy, for the record.

Like I said earlier, my mind is full of fuck.

Gah. Me too. My cat woke me up at 5 am and I immediately started writing posts on mafia games.

[WhenInRome]

What happened in the talk with fishy?

Surprisingly, it was productive! He thinks I'm mafia with Furc, and he said IS is mafia.

[WhenInRome]

Gah. Unsure of what to do.
-If I vote Fishy, I'm scum for jumping on the BW/voting someone who suspects me
-If I don't vote him, I'm scum for not lynching obvious scum
-If I vote someone else, I'm scum for not lynching obvious scum.

I'm just going to do what I think is right and

Vote:Fishy

P.S. Did anyone else notice the different kill flavors for chess and cool's death?

[WhenInRome]

WiR, I'm not convinced on you being scum.

It's possible, but not a sure thing (in my eyes). Something about you feels genuine. I think you would have been more cautious in the QT we had that one night had you been scum, for one thing.


Why do YOU think fishy is scum, WiR?

Well, there's this quote taken from the QT:"If I'm right, you're not the priority scumbag anyway." (He said I was mafia in the QT) Wut? It seems to me that mafia shouldn't be ranked in order of priority. Also, there's:"If I'm wrong, bringing it up tomorrow is going to distract; I'd prefer to talk about it here." Distract the town? Saying your FOSes isn't "distracting", it's "contributing"! It seems like he doesn't want to draw too much attention to himself by voting me, which fits with his play (all the v/LAs). Notice how he thinks me and IS are scum, but yet he hasn't placed a vote on either of us.

[WhenInRome]

Typical. Zoraster, really? The two players with the least contribution go on v/la when we're obviously nearing endgame. 'Til Monday isn't so bad though.


WiR, that is good evidence. I definitely agree that Fishy has been diverting attention from himself, seemingly intentionally.


I want to put fishy at L-1, but not yet, the way lynches have been fishy. (Pun unintentional.)


I definitely want to hear from everybody before proceeding.


I do want a fishy claim, though.

A fishy claim would be nice, but it could turn into what would have happened if Tasky claimed before he was lynched-he claims an important PR, we believe him, he's mafia, he misleads us all. Roles don't tell alignment in this game.

[WhenInRome]

Wait, IS, why are you suddenly saying Mafia A exists?

[WhenInRome]

Seems to have been slightly deceptive with fishy in his night QTs. Scumpoint there.

Well, at first his points seemed reasonable, but when I thought more about it I realized the flaws in his points.

[WhenInRome]

FFFFUUUUU

Go town!

[WhenInRome]

*claps*
Honestly not expecting that...

[WhenInRome]

It was pretty funny how I was the LAST town player alive, and they lynched me.