I get tired of running into brick walls, basically.DLG wrote:@ bobsnox
Why did you let this go so easily?
Maybe you'll get something better out of him.
(nods) Yeah, unless a tracker actually catches a scum killing someone, claiming unnecessary details is generally a bad idea, it just tells the scum who's a power role and who isn't.Fate wrote:If Yosarian has any town sense left, he won't out his actual results until after (if) I am made to claim
So, none of these votes meet your quality standards. But, are any of them in any way indicative of the main question here? You know, that little alignment question.brokenscraps wrote:werewolf has a horrible vote on Llamarble.
Darla's vote on Llamarble looks like a justified ("he is sheeping, lynch him!") rather than a believed vote.
Despite Jahudo voting (and then unvoting) Llamarble he seems to be taking a no-strong-accusations approach. "There are some questionable motives on Yos, there are some questionable motives on Llama, I have a strong-scum read on Darla, let's vote Llama to 'help the arms race'". Not a good vote.
Bud's reasoning abilities have collapsed somewhat and he has stuck on the Llama vote apparently because Llama didn't get lynched day 1. I can just imagine the cases that will be made if Llama doesn't get lynched day 2.
As it is I'm uneasy about Llama being town, but the votes on him just seem so poor...
Jahudo's vote seemed the worst, but I'm not too sure about the unvote...
Conspiracy theory: Yos/Fate/Llama are having more fun bussing than they've ever had before. Game over town. Game over.
Alright, I was hoping that would be your response.Yosarian2 wrote:(nods) Yeah, unless a tracker actually catches a scum killing someone, claiming unnecessary details is generally a bad idea, it just tells the scum who's a power role and who isn't.Fate wrote:If Yosarian has any town sense left, he won't out his actual results until after (if) I am made to claim
Sure, but you didn't even press the point.bobsnox wrote:I get tired of running into brick walls, basically.DLG wrote:@ bobsnox
Why did you let this go so easily?
Maybe you'll get something better out of him.
sorry?DLG wrote:Sure, but you didn't even press the point.bobsnox wrote:I get tired of running into brick walls, basically.DLG wrote:@ bobsnox
Why did you let this go so easily?
Maybe you'll get something better out of him.
For me, it's highly important because I've had a reasonable town read on Bub Bidderskins for most of the game, and this issue is making me reconsider that stance.
It wasn't a slip, it was the truth. It wasn't the scum's fault that Llamarble wasn't lynched (although they may have helped). The townies simply chickened out. Llamarble is currently in a state of denial about the chickening out thing, and is refusing to come to grips with reality. That's why I kept on the chickening out thing, because for some reason Llamarble couldn't get that fact into his thick head.DLG wrote:Having re-read the sequence after bobsnox pointed out the potential scumslip by Bub Bidderskins, I find some more concern with the fact that Bub Bidderskins tried to keep the focus of that situation on the "chickened out" part rather than addressing the real point. I also note that both bobsnox and Llamarble allow the debate to go that way instead of focusing in on the potential problem.
@ Bub Bidderskins
Do you have any comment specific to your usage of pointing out that it was "townies" who left the Llamarble wagon?
I didn't think it was a huge issue; in that situation Bubtown thinks I'm scum and thus assumes the people on my wagon were likely townies. Or Bubscum knows they're townies. Or Bub is using townie as a substitute for "player" instead of "town-aligned player." I tend to care more about actions & logic than wording unless I see wording that strikes me as remarkably unlikely from one alignment.DLG wrote: @ Llamarble
Same question as the one to bobsnox, but even more I would have expected you to really go after this point as opposed to arguing about "chickened out".
I think that Bub's case of bad wording involved bad logic...Llamarble wrote:I didn't think it was a huge issue; in that situation Bubtown thinks I'm scum and thus assumes the people on my wagon were likely townies. Or Bubscum knows they're townies. Or Bub is using townie as a substitute for "player" instead of "town-aligned player." I tend to care more about actions & logic than wording unless I see wording that strikes me as remarkably unlikely from one alignment.DLG wrote: @ Llamarble
Same question as the one to bobsnox, but even more I would have expected you to really go after this point as opposed to arguing about "chickened out".
This I agree with if it was just bad word choice.bobsnox wrote:I think that Bub's case of bad wording involved bad logic...
This is a rather large leap you've made. Can you explain in more detail how you arrived at this conclusion?DavidParker wrote:Translation: We can't mislynch Darla because she is having a bad day RL. So let's mislynch Bub today and then we can mislynch Darla tomorrow.