Open 288 - Mayo Clinic (Game Over!)
-
-
parknourie Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 756
- Joined: June 11, 2010
- Location: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
-
-
andrew94 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4045
- Joined: May 5, 2010
- Location: dota room
-
-
MrBump Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: December 19, 2010
- Location: Fermanagh, Northern Ireland
-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Whaaaat...?MrBump wrote:I'm not scum so Rain is ConfScum.
Unless I missed something (this is possible) the entire post this quote comes from is ridiculous unnecessary OMGUS.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Again, I could possibly be wrong, but I'm pretty sure I've seen an extremely similar post to this somewhere in the thread. Who are you parroting? Is it Chocolate Cake?MrBump wrote:I also dislike the way Kage is so keen on NL'ing because we might hit Town, but as he's a Vig, and he seems to think Mafia is nothing but lucky guessing, he has a low chance of hitting Mafia. WHAT THE FU-I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Oh I found it! It's Rain's post RIGHT ABOVE THAT POST!
Marill... what are you doing?I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Quadruple post. Rain has two legitimate posts so far in the game. Kage is the main topic of both of them.MrBump wrote:Also, you say I'm "probably scum" yet your vote is on Kage and you have barely commented on him. Do elaborate.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
Chocolate Cake Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: February 13, 2011
Not a convincing way to prove your innocence.parknourie wrote:My side = Town.
The end of the story.
Rain is right. MrBump is probably scum, but I'm not following the train of thought on Kage. Rain, could you help me out there?
^This is completely not true, and comes off as grasping at straws.MrBump wrote:Also, you say I'm "probably scum" yet your vote is on Kage and you have barely commented on him. Do elaborate.
P. Edit:
DAMN YOU, NINJA PACMAN!!!!-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
I have half a mind to change my vote to MrBump (I slipped and called him marill because that's what he was on the site I first met him on). Nobody else has made me quadruple post.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
Kagetora Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 74
- Joined: February 9, 2011
- Location: WA
Sigh this is gonna be a long post. Curse you sleeping time
I've always played, and still believe, that while you still have the opportunity to, lynching when you have no real reason to do so tends to be more harmful to the town than helpful. That's why I promote no lynch on the first day.I hate when people don't understand the difference between not knowing who to lynch and wanting to no lynch. There's NO NEED OR RUSH to place your vote. No lynching D1 is ridiculously idiotic. You don't need to have your vote on it just because you don't have anyone to vote for.
If I wanted to truly quote something, as I am doing, I would put it in the quotes that the forum provides for us. "Writing something like this" is more or less akin to using your fingers in the air, not a word for word quote. You're misreading my post.Putting things in "quotes" like that acts like you are quoting what was said by people, DESPITE THE FACT NO ONE SAID YOU WERE PROVED. You're making your situation worse than it is.
Dropping off the context that came afterward isn't helping your argument. I withdrew my vote because when it was pointed out that the initial vote against me was in jest, and that was a valid point. If you had read what I had said afterwards, I don't want to be lynched. This was merely a semi-defeatism.I... I... I... So we caught him, eh? Everyone was so focused on the "Lynch me" that no one really noticed the "Valid point" part. Because we caught him.
ALSO, notice how he's so intent on No Lynching because odds say we'll hit Town if we lynch. Yet he's willing to be lynched? HMMMMMMM...
Well I promise you I'm not scum, and that's a word I don't see very often online. It was a hypothetical situation that you are again, misreading."If I were Mafia" is basically a way of saying "I'm Mafia so I acted like Town and when people called me out on it I would go WELL Y'SEE IF I WERE MAFIA I WOULDN'T DO THAT so therefore I can't lose!"
Several things here. With the full game still around, L2 is pretty close and would likely get me voted off by sheer bandwagon. My claim actually saved me by removing several votes against me. Roleclaiming was what I considered the safest possible route to take. Also, if you're familiar with Aristotle's theory of persuasion, appeal to emotion is a powerful part of persuasion and I'm not entirely sure why such an appeal is so bad, when really the logic that has been presented is inherently flawed.>Final gambit on D1 on Page 3 at L-2
I think he said at one point something along the lines of "Well generally you claim at L-1" BUT YOU WEREN'T AT L-1.
More "lynch me" AtE going on there.
Could you explain how any of these are lies? The first one is a very good point to make, and the second one is as well. The third one isn't entirely true, I did display defeatism, but that's not necessarily a lie.evilpacman18 wrote:Blatant lie #1
Blatant lie #2 (Also a misrep of the intentions of this wagon)vatesi wrote:The problem is, ANY scum who is accused can claim vigilante since we have no way of validating vigilantes in the near future.vatesi wrote:SK's and mafia goons have exactly the same powers that vigilantes have. We cannot not lynch someone based solely on their vigilante claim.
Blatant lie #3vatesi wrote:but he has tried to defend himself to the very end.
Fair enough. If that's really why people want to lynch me, there's nothing I can really do to defend myself against that.Kagetora's views seem so alien to me. Promoting No Lynch, claimed vigilante but advocating not killing someone because that target may be town. His general play so far seems to be "play safe". I do not like.
See above points. I don't think it's entirely random but when I was initially targeted I don't understand the "logic" (also see above about use of quotation marks) behind and so it seems random to me.I also dislike the way Kage is so keen on NL'ing because we might hit Town, but as he's a Vig, and he seems to think Mafia is nothing but lucky guessing, he has a low chance of hitting Mafia. WHAT THE FU-
Yes. Yes I do. I asked the mod to ensure that the compulsive was meant to be there. (Paraphrasing is allowed)KAGE DO you realise (if your vig) that vigs are COMPULSIVE BRO.
My side = Town.
The end of the story.
To me this seems awfully scummy. You refuse to accept my claim to town when my survival depends on it, but you simply accept Park's when it's unlikely they'll receive enough votes to warrant a claim this early? I'm considering changing my vote at this point almost solely due to that.Parknourie, so Chocolate Cake is Scum because you're Town? Oh, Chocolate Cake is ConfScum!Ratio of Day 1 Mislynches: 1/1-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Oh jeez. You can't make a post that long without including the names of the people you quote. I don't even wanna read this post now.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
Kagetora Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 74
- Joined: February 9, 2011
- Location: WA
Edited version of my previous post, including names this time. Sorry about that.Kagetora wrote:Sigh this is gonna be a long post. Curse you sleeping time
I've always played, and still believe, that while you still have the opportunity to, lynching when you have no real reason to do so tends to be more harmful to the town than helpful. That's why I promote no lynch on the first day.Pacman wrote:I hate when people don't understand the difference between not knowing who to lynch and wanting to no lynch. There's NO NEED OR RUSH to place your vote. No lynching D1 is ridiculously idiotic. You don't need to have your vote on it just because you don't have anyone to vote for.
If I wanted to truly quote something, as I am doing, I would put it in the quotes that the forum provides for us. "Writing something like this" is more or less akin to using your fingers in the air, not a word for word quote. You're misreading my post.MrBump wrote:Putting things in "quotes" like that acts like you are quoting what was said by people, DESPITE THE FACT NO ONE SAID YOU WERE PROVED. You're making your situation worse than it is.
Dropping off the context that came afterward isn't helping your argument. I withdrew my vote because when it was pointed out that the initial vote against me was in jest, and that was a valid point. If you had read what I had said afterwards, I don't want to be lynched. This was merely a semi-defeatism.MrBump wrote:I... I... I... So we caught him, eh? Everyone was so focused on the "Lynch me" that no one really noticed the "Valid point" part. Because we caught him.
ALSO, notice how he's so intent on No Lynching because odds say we'll hit Town if we lynch. Yet he's willing to be lynched? HMMMMMMM...
Well I promise you I'm not scum, and that's a word I don't see very often online. It was a hypothetical situation that you are again, misreading.MrBump wrote:"If I were Mafia" is basically a way of saying "I'm Mafia so I acted like Town and when people called me out on it I would go WELL Y'SEE IF I WERE MAFIA I WOULDN'T DO THAT so therefore I can't lose!"
Several things here. With the full game still around, L2 is pretty close and would likely get me voted off by sheer bandwagon. My claim actually saved me by removing several votes against me. Roleclaiming was what I considered the safest possible route to take. Also, if you're familiar with Aristotle's theory of persuasion, appeal to emotion is a powerful part of persuasion and I'm not entirely sure why such an appeal is so bad, when really the logic that has been presented is inherently flawed.MrBump wrote:>Final gambit on D1 on Page 3 at L-2
I think he said at one point something along the lines of "Well generally you claim at L-1" BUT YOU WEREN'T AT L-1.
More "lynch me" AtE going on there.
Could you explain how any of these are lies? The first one is a very good point to make, and the second one is as well. The third one isn't entirely true, I did display defeatism, but that's not necessarily a lie.evilpacman18 wrote:Blatant lie #1
Blatant lie #2 (Also a misrep of the intentions of this wagon)vatesi wrote:The problem is, ANY scum who is accused can claim vigilante since we have no way of validating vigilantes in the near future.vatesi wrote:SK's and mafia goons have exactly the same powers that vigilantes have. We cannot not lynch someone based solely on their vigilante claim.
Blatant lie #3vatesi wrote:but he has tried to defend himself to the very end.
Fair enough. If that's really why people want to lynch me, there's nothing I can really do to defend myself against that.Rain wrote:Kagetora's views seem so alien to me. Promoting No Lynch, claimed vigilante but advocating not killing someone because that target may be town. His general play so far seems to be "play safe". I do not like.
See above points. I don't think it's entirely random but when I was initially targeted I don't understand the "logic" (also see above about use of quotation marks) behind and so it seems random to me.MrBump wrote:I also dislike the way Kage is so keen on NL'ing because we might hit Town, but as he's a Vig, and he seems to think Mafia is nothing but lucky guessing, he has a low chance of hitting Mafia. WHAT THE FU-
Yes. Yes I do. I asked the mod to ensure that the compulsive was meant to be there. (Paraphrasing is allowed)Andrew wrote:KAGE DO you realise (if your vig) that vigs are COMPULSIVE BRO.
Parknourie wrote:My side = Town.
The end of the story.
To me this seems awfully scummy. You refuse to accept my claim to town when my survival depends on it, but you simply accept Park's when it's unlikely they'll receive enough votes to warrant a claim this early? I'm considering changing my vote at this point almost solely due to that.MrBump wrote:Parknourie, so Chocolate Cake is Scum because you're Town? Oh, Chocolate Cake is ConfScum!Ratio of Day 1 Mislynches: 1/1-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Can we please get votes back on this guy?Kagetora wrote:Sigh this is gonna be a long post. Curse you sleeping time
I've always played, and still believe, that while you still have the opportunity to, lynching when you have no real reason to do so tends to be more harmful to the town than helpful. That's why I promote no lynch on the first day.I hate when people don't understand the difference between not knowing who to lynch and wanting to no lynch. There's NO NEED OR RUSH to place your vote. No lynching D1 is ridiculously idiotic. You don't need to have your vote on it just because you don't have anyone to vote for.
Lynching when you have no real reason is always dumb. That's obvious. But why is it impossible to have no reason on the first day? By now there's enough reason to lynch several people and it's the first day. You talk until there's reason. If we just no lynched prematurely under the mentality that the first day can't productive, how many days would go by before we felt we had reason? It doesn't magically appear on the second day. Create conversation. Argue. Agree and disagree with what people are saying, then you'll have reason. Even on the first day. But you just seem eager to waste as much of the town's time as possible.
If I wanted to truly quote something, as I am doing, I would put it in the quotes that the forum provides for us. "Writing something like this" is more or less akin to using your fingers in the air, not a word for word quote. You're misreading my post.Putting things in "quotes" like that acts like you are quoting what was said by people, DESPITE THE FACT NO ONE SAID YOU WERE PROVED. You're making your situation worse than it is.
Dropping off the context that came afterward isn't helping your argument. I withdrew my vote because when it was pointed out that the initial vote against me was in jest, and that was a valid point. If you had read what I had said afterwards, I don't want to be lynched. This was merely a semi-defeatism.I... I... I... So we caught him, eh? Everyone was so focused on the "Lynch me" that no one really noticed the "Valid point" part. Because we caught him.
ALSO, notice how he's so intent on No Lynching because odds say we'll hit Town if we lynch. Yet he's willing to be lynched? HMMMMMMM...
Well I promise you I'm not scum, and that's a word I don't see very often online. It was a hypothetical situation that you are again, misreading."If I were Mafia" is basically a way of saying "I'm Mafia so I acted like Town and when people called me out on it I would go WELL Y'SEE IF I WERE MAFIA I WOULDN'T DO THAT so therefore I can't lose!"
If he's misreading it, why don't you give us the way it was supposed to be read?
Several things here. With the full game still around, L2 is pretty close and would likely get me voted off by sheer bandwagon. My claim actually saved me by removing several votes against me. Roleclaiming was what I considered the safest possible route to take. Also, if you're familiar with Aristotle's theory of persuasion, appeal to emotion is a powerful part of persuasion and I'm not entirely sure why such an appeal is so bad, when really the logic that has been presented is inherently flawed.>Final gambit on D1 on Page 3 at L-2
I think he said at one point something along the lines of "Well generally you claim at L-1" BUT YOU WEREN'T AT L-1.
More "lynch me" AtE going on there.
Persuasion has no place in town defense. It's for scum and people trying to lead a wagon to use, nobody else. I will admit, you did pick the right time to claim, however.
Could you explain how any of these are lies? The first one is a very good point to make, and the second one is as well. The third one isn't entirely true, I did display defeatism, but that's not necessarily a lie.evilpacman18 wrote:Blatant lie #1
Blatant lie #2 (Also a misrep of the intentions of this wagon)vatesi wrote:The problem is, ANY scum who is accused can claim vigilante since we have no way of validating vigilantes in the near future.vatesi wrote:SK's and mafia goons have exactly the same powers that vigilantes have. We cannot not lynch someone based solely on their vigilante claim.
Blatant lie #3vatesi wrote:but he has tried to defend himself to the very end.
The first one is untrue because of the possibility of counter claims, which I see as a good idea in a game with this setup where town is almost guaranteed to have a doc into the endgame. The second one just isn't true at all. SKs, goons, and vigs might share killing in common, but the roles are about as different as they could possibly be. Also implying that we wanted to lynch you BECAUSE you claimed vig was the bigger blatant lie of that quote. And the third IS necessarily a blatant lie so I'm not even gonna touch it.
Fair enough. If that's really why people want to lynch me, there's nothing I can really do to defend myself against that.Kagetora's views seem so alien to me. Promoting No Lynch, claimed vigilante but advocating not killing someone because that target may be town. His general play so far seems to be "play safe". I do not like.
Also misrepping his wagon, just like his scumbuddy vat.
See above points. I don't think it's entirely random but when I was initially targeted I don't understand the "logic" (also see above about use of quotation marks) behind and so it seems random to me.I also dislike the way Kage is so keen on NL'ing because we might hit Town, but as he's a Vig, and he seems to think Mafia is nothing but lucky guessing, he has a low chance of hitting Mafia. WHAT THE FU-
Yes. Yes I do. I asked the mod to ensure that the compulsive was meant to be there. (Paraphrasing is allowed)KAGE DO you realise (if your vig) that vigs are COMPULSIVE BRO.
My side = Town.
The end of the story.
To me this seems awfully scummy. You refuse to accept my claim to town when my survival depends on it, but you simply accept Park's when it's unlikely they'll receive enough votes to warrant a claim this early? I'm considering changing my vote at this point almost solely due to that.Parknourie, so Chocolate Cake is Scum because you're Town? Oh, Chocolate Cake is ConfScum!
You're... stupid.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
Kagetora Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 74
- Joined: February 9, 2011
- Location: WA
Hold on a second. This just jumped out at me.
Persuasion has no place in town defense. It's for scum and people trying to lead a wagon to use, nobody else. I will admit, you did pick the right time to claim, however.Is this a change of opinion or a contradiction?
It's still all unfounded speculation. Have you even considered that maybe these people don't have an ulterior motive and simply arguing the hole in the logic? I will almost always support a lynch on the second day, when we have BOTH actions and words that we can speculate on, rather than just one of the two.Lynching when you have no real reason is always dumb. That's obvious. But why is it impossible to have no reason on the first day? By now there's enough reason to lynch several people and it's the first day. You talk until there's reason. If we just no lynched prematurely under the mentality that the first day can't productive, how many days would go by before we felt we had reason? It doesn't magically appear on the second day. Create conversation. Argue. Agree and disagree with what people are saying, then you'll have reason. Even on the first day. But you just seem eager to waste as much of the town's time as possible.
I am doing the best that I can, and also on most forums, putting stuff inIf he's misreading it, why don't you give us the way it was supposed to be read?this kind of quote[ /quote] versus "this kind of quote" is a very big difference which I'm sure you can attest to.
Has anyone counter-claimed my role? The second one is true. They have the same POWER but not the same objective. I'm pretty much positive this is what he means. I'm not entirely sure what you're saying in the italics part of the quote.The first one is untrue because of the possibility of counter claims, which I see as a good idea in a game with this setup where town is almost guaranteed to have a doc into the endgame. The second one just isn't true at all. SKs, goons, and vigs might share killing in common, but the roles are about as different as they could possibly be.Also implying that we wanted to lynch you BECAUSE you claimed vig was the bigger blatant lie of that quote.And the third IS necessarily a blatant lie so I'm not even gonna touch it.
Can we please maintain some civility here? I don't believe I've directly insulted you at all this game, I'd ask that you please do the same for me.You're... stupid.Ratio of Day 1 Mislynches: 1/1-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Kagetora wrote:Hold on a second. This just jumped out at me.
Persuasion has no place in town defense. It's for scum and people trying to lead a wagon to use, nobody else. I will admit, you did pick the right time to claim, however.Is this a change of opinion or a contradiction?
Not sure what you're seeing. I called your friend a dumbass because you said you and him agreed that giving up was a good idea. I'll still stand by that opinion. I never said anything about your claim. If you want me to: It's obviously a lie but it was well-timed.
It's still all unfounded speculation. Have you even considered that maybe these people don't have an ulterior motive and simply arguing the hole in the logic? I will almost always support a lynch on the second day, when we have BOTH actions and words that we can speculate on, rather than just one of the two.Lynching when you have no real reason is always dumb. That's obvious. But why is it impossible to have no reason on the first day? By now there's enough reason to lynch several people and it's the first day. You talk until there's reason. If we just no lynched prematurely under the mentality that the first day can't productive, how many days would go by before we felt we had reason? It doesn't magically appear on the second day. Create conversation. Argue. Agree and disagree with what people are saying, then you'll have reason. Even on the first day. But you just seem eager to waste as much of the town's time as possible.
Does someone wanna explain this to me? It doesn't make any sense. It's like he just decided to talk about something completely beside the point.
I am doing the best that I can, and also on most forums, putting stuff inIf he's misreading it, why don't you give us the way it was supposed to be read?this kind of quote[ /quote] versus "this kind of quote" is a very big difference which I'm sure you can attest to.
Has anyone counter-claimed my role? The second one is true. They have the same POWER but not the same objective. I'm pretty much positive this is what he means. I'm not entirely sure what you're saying in the italics part of the quote.The first one is untrue because of the possibility of counter claims, which I see as a good idea in a game with this setup where town is almost guaranteed to have a doc into the endgame. The second one just isn't true at all. SKs, goons, and vigs might share killing in common, but the roles are about as different as they could possibly be.Also implying that we wanted to lynch you BECAUSE you claimed vig was the bigger blatant lie of that quote.And the third IS necessarily a blatant lie so I'm not even gonna touch it.
If he's talking about powers as just powers and not powers AND objectives, then he needs to get his mind back in the game because that's trivial unimportant information.
Can we please maintain some civility here? I don't believe I've directly insulted you at all this game, I'd ask that you please do the same for me.You're... stupid.
Say things that make sense. Then we'll talk.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
Chocolate Cake Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 67
- Joined: February 13, 2011
-
-
Kagetora Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 74
- Joined: February 9, 2011
- Location: WA
I'm seeing you calling my friend a dumbass because he and I agreed that roleclaiming was the right option to take. And I still haven't lied yet.Not sure what you're seeing. I called your friend a dumbass because you said you and him agreed that giving up was a good idea. I'll still stand by that opinion. I never said anything about your claim. If you want me to: It's obviously a lie but it was well-timed.
Any discussion on the first day will be unfounded speculation, you have no hard evidence that can be used to prove or disprove a hypothesis. If you lynch me, you merely prove my point. I am a vigilante, and if/when you lynch me and prove it so, then you will have proven that all of this is unfounded speculation.Does someone wanna explain this to me? It doesn't make any sense. It's like he just decided to talk about something completely beside the point.
No it's not. He's saying that since I claimed vigilante, you can't know for sure that I personally killed someone, when there are plenty of other people who can mess with my claim.If he's talking about powers as just powers and not powers AND objectives, then he needs to get his mind back in the game because that's trivial unimportant information.
We have been talking, and your aggressive nature makes much less sense than the defensive one you put me in.Say things that make sense. Then we'll talk.
@CC: Sure thing. As for the no lynching argument and defeatism, this comes from my experiences of playing this game everyday with my friends and the conclusions we have collectively come to.Ratio of Day 1 Mislynches: 1/1-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
QFT.Chocolate Cake wrote:Kage is proving to us the value of the newbie game
Frankly, I'm having a harder time seeing him as scum than I was before. He's just completely underprepared and way too inexperienced for this. Still, I'm seeing newbscum. Not newbtown.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Kagetora wrote:
I'm seeing you calling my friend a dumbass because he and I agreed that roleclaiming was the right option to take. And I still haven't lied yet.Not sure what you're seeing. I called your friend a dumbass because you said you and him agreed that giving up was a good idea. I'll still stand by that opinion. I never said anything about your claim. If you want me to: It's obviously a lie but it was well-timed.
Any discussion on the first day will be unfounded speculation, you have no hard evidence that can be used to prove or disprove a hypothesis. If you lynch me, you merely prove my point. I am a vigilante, and if/when you lynch me and prove it so, then you will have proven that all of this is unfounded speculation.Does someone wanna explain this to me? It doesn't make any sense. It's like he just decided to talk about something completely beside the point.
No it's not. He's saying that since I claimed vigilante, you can't know for sure that I personally killed someone, when there are plenty of other people who can mess with my claim.If he's talking about powers as just powers and not powers AND objectives, then he needs to get his mind back in the game because that's trivial unimportant information.
We have been talking, and your aggressive nature makes much less sense than the defensive one you put me in.Say things that make sense. Then we'll talk.
@CC: Sure thing. As for the no lynching argument and defeatism, this comes from my experiences of playing this game everyday with my friends and the conclusions we have collectively come to.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
crap. That wasn't supposed to happen. Ignore that.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
1. Go back and read the post you linked. I asked you why would you ACCEPT DEFEAT (obviously a reference to your saying "lolwutever just lynch me") if you were a vig. Then you said "lol I broke the rules and asked my friend and he told me to." Then I called him a dumbass. NOWHERE do you specify that you asked him about claiming so I'm SUPPOSED to assume that we were talking about the functional part of my post that you quoted, the accepting defeat part. I would be the stupid one to assume otherwise.evilpacman18 wrote:Kagetora wrote:
1. I'm seeing you calling my friend a dumbass because he and I agreed that roleclaiming was the right option to take. And I still haven't lied yet.Not sure what you're seeing. I called your friend a dumbass because you said you and him agreed that giving up was a good idea. I'll still stand by that opinion. I never said anything about your claim. If you want me to: It's obviously a lie but it was well-timed.
2. Any discussion on the first day will be unfounded speculation, you have no hard evidence that can be used to prove or disprove a hypothesis. If you lynch me, you merely prove my point. I am a vigilante, and if/when you lynch me and prove it so, then you will have proven that all of this is unfounded speculation.Does someone wanna explain this to me? It doesn't make any sense. It's like he just decided to talk about something completely beside the point.
3. No it's not. He's saying that since I claimed vigilante, you can't know for sure that I personally killed someone, when there are plenty of other people who can mess with my claim.If he's talking about powers as just powers and not powers AND objectives, then he needs to get his mind back in the game because that's trivial unimportant information.
4. We have been talking, and your aggressive nature makes much less sense than the defensive one you put me in.Say things that make sense. Then we'll talk.
@CC: Sure thing. As for the no lynching argument and defeatism, this comes from my experiences of playing this game everyday with my friends and the conclusions we have collectively come to.
2.THIS IS MAFIA
YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T UNDERSTAND THE MAIN POINT OF THIS GAME. EVERY SINGLE THING SAID IS GONNA BE ROOTED IN SPECULATION. IT'S THEPOINTOF THE GAME!!!!!!!
3. Yeah. You're right, actually.
4. Ignoring this.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM-
-
Kagetora Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 74
- Joined: February 9, 2011
- Location: WA
I did. While what you say is a valid reading of the post which I hadn't seriously considered, mine is as well. The way my post was meant to be read would be something along the lines of 'I don't give up. My friend and I agree that roleclaiming is the best option.' And how many times must I clarify this? I did not talk to anyone here on this site. I was consulting a friend of mine, outside the game. Nowhere do I see a rule that specifically bans this, and your pushing of the issue that isn't there is really getting on my nerves.evilpacman18 wrote:1. Go back and read the post you linked. I asked you why would you ACCEPT DEFEAT (obviously a reference to your saying "lolwutever just lynch me") if you were a vig. Then you said "lol I broke the rules and asked my friend and he told me to." Then I called him a dumbass. NOWHERE do you specify that you asked him about claiming so I'm SUPPOSED to assume that we were talking about the functional part of my post that you quoted, the accepting defeat part. I would be the stupid one to assume otherwise.
If I really wanted to give up and quit the game, I would have tried to get myself modkilled, which is silly to suggest that I truly want OUT of this game.
You obviously don't understand what I'm saying. Yes, interpreting what other people say is good, but it simply cannot be the only thing you go off of. Yes it can be used as evidence, but without any actions, what good is it? Not much. And once again, if your incorrect speculation as to my scum nature results in my lynch, you will prove my point.2.THIS IS MAFIA
*snip*
YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T UNDERSTAND THE MAIN POINT OF THIS GAME. EVERY SINGLE THING SAID IS GONNA BE ROOTED IN SPECULATION. IT'S THEPOINTOF THE GAME!!!!!!!
Wow, we found something we agree on.3. Yeah. You're right, actually.
I bear no ill will towards you, but your argument simply doesn't make sense.Ratio of Day 1 Mislynches: 1/1-
-
MrBump Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: December 19, 2010
- Location: Fermanagh, Northern Ireland
I'm merely posting using logic that has been used in this thread, but in a more obvious fashion. I don't REALLY think Rain is ConfScum.
I'm grasping at straws in my, what, third post in the thread? Are you actually serious? Despite the fact I already posted a "wall" about how I think three, possibly a fourth (I know there's three but yeah) are scum? Are you out of your mind?Chocolate Cake wrote:
Not a convincing way to prove your innocence.parknourie wrote:My side = Town.
The end of the story.
Rain is right. MrBump is probably scum, but I'm not following the train of thought on Kage. Rain, could you help me out there?
^This is completely not true, and comes off as grasping at straws.MrBump wrote:Also, you say I'm "probably scum" yet your vote is on Kage and you have barely commented on him. Do elaborate.
P. Edit:
DAMN YOU, NINJA PACMAN!!!!
How did you miss that, Kage.Olinea in the OP wrote:There is to beNO personal communication outside of the forum postingsunless your role PM specifically allows it. Players who can communicate outside of the forum postings may communicate at night and during the confirmation stage.
What I'm picking up is everyone jumping on my ass for things other people have already done. Parroting has been done a million times in this thread. Agreeing with someone is NOT SCUMMY. If that was the case, why post at all? I thought Rain's point was good. So basically I'm not allowed to agree with people's views on players? BEARING IN MIND, I think said player is scum?
Olinea: IF WE HAVE ANOTHER PROTECTIVE ROLE YOU NEED TO BE SO FAR UP MRBUMP'S ASS YOU CAN SMELL WHAT HE HAD FOR BREAKFAST-
-
MrBump Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1627
- Joined: December 19, 2010
- Location: Fermanagh, Northern Ireland
-
-
evilpacman18 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4221
- Joined: August 8, 2010
- Location: Boston, MA
Oh I see. You're one of those noobs that thinks that the game can't be played without examining kills, claims, PR usage, etc. That's not true at all. For instance. Go read any game. It's SUPER RARE for scum to be caught because of who they killed. Also, how do you explain the countless lynches of scum before any of this information made itself available. The town is never well-informed and that doesn't get that much better until endgame in general. You're implying that all early lynches of scum are nothing more than dumb luck just because helpful solid information wasn't available. Blatant lie.Kagetora wrote:You obviously don't understand what I'm saying. Yes, interpreting what other people say is good, but it simply cannot be the only thing you go off of. Yes it can be used as evidence, but without any actions, what good is it? Not much. And once again, if your incorrect speculation as to my scum nature results in my lynch, you will prove my point.I play piano and competitive Smash 4 under the tag EPM
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.