I'm interested in something now (Warning Zito: Meta argument incoming - but good one this time, promises!)
Here's arguments you make as scum:
but you are
probably
lying, I know you andrew and you get lynched early in lots of games,
I can see you
totally making this up to get town cred.
Your role doesn't even make sense
, I never heard of a person with multiple lives before.
Also and
on the off chance you are telling the truth
and you don't die, there is no gurantee we will be at Mylo, you are making HUGE assumptions like you know what the night actions are going to be.
You are assuming we don't find a guilty person overnight.
when going through there are obvious scummy people. You, furclow, and Don are my top 3
1. he seems to want to establish town cred so he follows Tasky's advice and changes his vote
2. when Jerb's FOS'd me pappums follows it up by saying he FOS's me also. He also says that the current discussion isn't going to tell us anything which seems to me like somebody in that conversation is scum and he wants to deflect to somebody else, no to mention he had just gone over 2 days without posting anything himself (after being called out for his vote switch mind you) so pot:kettle for the inactivity. The going inactive is a classic scum trick to go get the attention off of you
3. he votes Ross and says it is mainly "gut" and using the whole reaction to tasky's questions to start (notice yet again he is following Jerbs, he followed Jerb's FOS and follows Jerb's Vote)
...
5. unvotes mute/rain but he seems reluctant to
6. right after I say elleran is indecisive, pappums chimes in with his own comment about elleran being weird
7. tries to explain his votes but isn't convincing enough to me
unvote, vote Substrike
He was yet another person who claims lurker hunting is anti town which is totally not the case, Weird was the first to call lurkerhunting and he was scum, so I am going with substrike.
The general consensus on mafiascum is lurkers are anti-town and in my personal experience lurkers are more often scum, so lurker hunting is totally acceptable (can provide evidence if need to)
his reasons for Amor lynch were weak and his reason for voting Tmh was even weaker (don't think he even gave one that I can find, other than just sheeping his vote, he also claims tmh chainsaws and OMGUS's but never provides any evidence for it)
add the fact that he was a lurker also and attacking people lurker hunting I am more comfortable with voting him, I'd urge somebody who has an investigative power check out emp
Vote Mariyta
1. because her vote on the wagon was really suspicious, even pointing out that she was checking the vote count, granted I also said I wanted to check the vote count but I was actually trying to vote and actually it submit and was stopped by her vote and that comment had me worried.
2. she hops off the wagon and goes after an inactive?
3. she tries to twist my words to mean something completely different and when I call her on it, she ignores me.
You're much more certain and forceful about your cases when you're town then scum. Washy cases are often a scumtell, but Rob, for you they're a lot stronger than they are for many people. You are a person who likes to be right - being scum forces you to either bus buddies, or be very very wrong in a very forceful manner.
This is your case on Substrike:
RobCapone wrote:I have been trying to tell if subs was just newbish cause he sounds alot like how I played when I first joined, but seeing he has been here since 2008(regardless if he "hasn't played in a while") he should not be playing like this if he is town, so I have to assume he probably isn't and just trying to play it off that isn't working.
Hayker:
vote hayker
for somebody who was eager to start the game, his play since it started still hasn't lived up to the expectation
he still has more pre-game posts than he does since it started, plus he has logged in since his last post and hasn't provided anything new
My vote is because since the game has started he has had 3 posts and has logged insince his last post 3 days ago and posted nothing
He comes in posts a little, ignores the subs wagon basically and votes somebody and leaves
looks like he was attempting to fly under the radar, 1 vote on him isn't enough to get him to participate, maybe a 2nd will, if not than others can decide what to do but he IS lurking.
and I laid out why I am suspicious of subsy, once hayker posts more I'll move my vote back to subsy
My one problem is that both of the town games I'm reading you were protecting a power role, so were obviously making a certain percentage of total nonsense posts to lower the odds that you were seen as a danger. But what strikes me clear and true is this - you like to be certain someone is scum, and you DON'T like bussing your buddies at all. The result is some epically washy cases.
Which is what I'm seeing right now. Kinda admit you have my attention.
