I'm just gonna blatantly sheep someone else now:Jack wrote:unvote, vote:chesskid
No. Bad. The fuck is this?
Where is your case? Where are your reasons?
And so HELP ME GOD, IF YOU QUOTE ANYTHING FATE HAs SAID I WILL RAGE.
I'm just gonna blatantly sheep someone else now:Jack wrote:unvote, vote:chesskid
No. Bad. The fuck is this?
Where is your case? Where are your reasons?
And so HELP ME GOD, IF YOU QUOTE ANYTHING FATE HAs SAID I WILL RAGE.
Yes exactly. We lynch Fate and when we see him flip town, I'll be 100% confirmed town.GreyICE wrote:Well, whatever, if that works as I think, you just became confirmable town, and Fate is towns again, so. Cult hunting. Someone flying under the radar as a vague town read.
RedCoyote understood where I was coming from with that. You just stretched that all out to mean what you want it to mean.The Rufflig wrote:No, no, no, no, NO! In fact, Starbuck mentions that Amrun was answering for two different people. This shows that it was more of Amrun's playing style than scummy behavior, but even putting that aside, it is still wrong. Starbuck was arguing that Amrun was scummy for defending his scum buddy chesskid3. This argument relies on the "fact" that chesskid3 is scummy - which had not been proven. Bad argument! Not good point!
I agree with this. You're probably right, IS.IS 423 wrote:Considering Jack was a vig, he isnt probably a cult leader, but might be a stooge now.
No need to get in a huff. Why didn't you just ask me at the time? I was being a little tongue-in-cheek here, but the main thing I wanted to convey was I liked all of their posts. I like the pressure on Wraith and ender. I liked how chess paid close attention to ender's potential slip (which still could've been a slip for all we know, although, given his role claim, I feel a little less prone to push him right now). I liked Fate's ballsy aggression at that juncture. Wraith gave me bad, bad vibes, and I wanted to see him lynched. I agreed with the people who helped make that happen and the tactics they used to get information from others.Rufflig 441 wrote:Jack, chesskid3 and Fate are probably town??? Those three players style of play is to make themselves unreadable no matter what alignment they happen to be -- which is great if they are scum, but really hurts the town if they are townies. I'd best stop there before I start ranting about the trio. The point is that I don't see how on earth he came up with probable townie reads on the trio.
I disagree. chess' alignment is beside the point really. Amrun sticking up for chess is the issue. Amrun shouldn't have known chess' alignment (whatever it was) unless she had a scum role (or like a Mason or something).Rufflig 441 wrote:Starbuck was arguing that Amrun was scummy for defending his scum buddy chesskid3. This argument relies on the "fact" that chesskid3 is scummy - which had not been proven. Bad argument! Not good point!
I don't know what you want me to say. I'm not here 24/7. I try to post on all the activity from my last post on, but there's little more I can do outside of that. I (hopefully) helped to get Wraith lynched yesterday. I'm on record as not supportive of the current highest vote getting bandwagon today. I'd like Jack, chess, and bv to all feel more heat.Rufflig 441 wrote:Overall, RedCoyote has been flying under my radar almost as much as Raivann. RedCoyote seems to be making just enough noise to try and get people to forget that he isn't really contributing and I don't like it.
You know what sums up you? I don't think you like anyone here as town.Rufflig 441 wrote:Fate and chesskid3: UGH! Yeah, that about sums it up.
I wouldn't say it's common for it to do so.Rufflig 443 wrote:Did everyone notice that the vote count did not reset after the day kill?
Why are you assuming that Raviann's power is legit?Grey 446 wrote:Well, whatever, if that works as I think, you just became confirmable town, and Fate is towns again, so. Cult hunting. Someone flying under the radar as a vague town read.
You really shouldn't press me on these details, because I will show you.Starbuck wrote:First, where did I mention that Amrun was answering 2 different people? And how does this show it was her playing style?
However, that wasn't the point of my argument.Starbuck wrote:You aren't chesskid, and you are blatantly saying that behavior that I think to be scummy is a joke. I think you are trying to protect your buddy and answer for him. Not liking this at all.
I doubt that he didn't know the game started. I was busy on the day that PMs came out and didn't get to reply to the mod and already had a PM sitting in my box from the mod when I got home stating that he didn't think I could keep up with the game. So I HIGHLY doubt that he didn't know the game started.
Now that's 2 people that you are answering for and making excuses for.
Vote: Amrun
I'm gonna call it right now. Amrun, bv, and chess for scum 2011.
chesskid3's alignment is the point! For instance, if someone shot ender241 right now and he flipped cult recruiter or mafia that would reflect really badly on Starbuck and myself because we defended him. However, if he flipped townie, then no scumminess is transfered to Starbuck and myself. If Amrun is scummy for defending chesskid3, then Starbuck and I have to be scummy for defending ender241 -- you can't have it both efing ways! The alignment of the one being defended is that efing importantRedCoyote wrote:I disagree. chess' alignment is beside the point really. Amrun sticking up for chess is the issue. Amrun shouldn't have known chess' alignment (whatever it was) unless she had a scum role (or like a Mason or something).
Since I've got about half the town on my likely scum list, I'd have to agree with you.RedCoyote wrote:You know what sums up you? I don't think you like anyone here as town.
Yeah, that's the thing - were you really being tongue-in-cheek? chesskid3 and Fate make it a practise to be flippant so they can walk away from anything they say with that excuse. Jack uses a different style to help make himself unreadable. It's not bad to be unreadable, if you're scum but it is terrible play if you're town. Why? That sort of play expands the list of potential scum for the town instead of helping to shrink down the list of potential scum. Which makes it so much harder for the town to weed out the true scum from the scum-wannabe townies.RedCoyote wrote:I was being a little tongue-in-cheek here, but the main thing I wanted to convey was I liked all of their posts.
Jack wrote:kill:Amrun
Could Jack be able to kill and recruit?Jack wrote:recruit:fate
We should all do this, and then when nothing happens it proves we aren't the cult leader with an in thread recruit ability.
If this is about the disagreement/defense issue, that was a different thing.The Rufflig wrote:That's twice now that you haven't remembered what you said in this game. Perhaps because you don't actually believe what you are telling us?
My argument is that she was ANSWERING for others. Defense is kinda implied, but it wasn't my point.The Rufflig wrote: A good part of your argument is that Amrun has to be scum because he is defending others.
No shit, Sherlock.The Rufflig wrote:Secondly, Amrun's flip gives no information about the alignment of those he was defending.
Because I had more of a case than just her answering for people and I even said at the beginning of that first post that I would break it up into multiple posts so that it wasn't one long wall.The Rufflig wrote:Your whole argument is a variation of the Chainsaw defense which requires that the person being defended be scum. Quite frankly, if you hadn't made a subsequent post with the other reasons you thought Amrun was scummy and if bv310 hadn't muddied the waters about Amrun, I would have voted for you over this.
Figured as much. Can we ignore this doofus and lynch Fate now? Hopefully someone does us a favor and just kills him for us tomorrow.Raivann wrote:No, I can't purify zombies. That would be a neat trick if I could though.
Wow, that's a tell. Definite tell. Yep, I canStarbuck wrote:I just did an ISO of chesskid, and I really don't see anything prolific in his posting. He really just seems to be trying to ride the wave of the game along.
Vote: chesskid
Why, Internet Stranger,what an ugly thing to say.Internet Stranger wrote:Figured as much. Can we ignore this doofus and lynch Fate now? Hopefully someone does us a favor and just kills him for us tomorrow.Raivann wrote:No, I can't purify zombies. That would be a neat trick if I could though.
By the way Jack, seriously, way to FAIL on that vig shot.
Uh, no - that IS what we were talking about.Starbuck wrote:If this is about the disagreement/defense issue, that was a different thing.
Starbuck wrote:I actually wanted you to show the class what you were talking about with the current situation so I can correct you. It's not that I did not remember what I said.
I'd hammer.
And keep in mind I haven't forgotten this from last game:Amrum your vote won't hammer.
And I promise I won't hammer him, it was just a gambit to pressure him. I really never had any intention of hammering him.
VOTE: Ethereal Cookie
OOPS