Unvote, Vote: Dazzy
Unvote, Vote: FarmeriXi
Unvote, Vote: Forseti
Unvote, Vote: Ghostlin
Unvote, Vote: gxw
Unvote, Vote: KingTwelveSixteen
Unvote, Vote: Mute
Unvote, Vote: Twistedspoon
Because lemons.
Hmm well this is my first game on this site, and I've only skimmed through some other recent newbie/mini theme games so far, and I didn't see anything like this in those. I planned to do my first post like that as soon as I /in-ed the newbie queue, for the reason below.Charlie wrote: Waitaminute. I'm sure I've seen this sort of thing before. You'd best explain before I go looking for it.
1.Out of the six players who have responded after my post, you are one out of four who acknowledged my post, and you are the only one who had to go make a big deal out of it, which, according to you, is indicative of scum. I also find it interesting that you act like I didn't start a wagon, when, in fact, I did. And it's on you. My last vote was on you and I never unvoted.Twistedspoon wrote: GXW, your post is scummy in that it completely denies the point of the RVS. You're supposed to start a wagon going by placing a vote on one of the players.1. If the player is (bad)scum then they should react badly to itand crack under the pressure.
2. Double RVS-ing tends to be a solid scumtell, since there's no point to it. You RVS for pressure - why would you destroy reasonless pressure on one person to push reasonless pressure on another?
And in your case it's 9 times worse :p
HoS: gxw
I'm not voting for you yet because it is a newbie game, and I remember in my first newbie game I too made a very scummish first post, and I turned out to be town (Isn't that right Farmer )
However, I'm HoSing you because of the reasons above, despite it being a newbie game. You need to explain to us like Charlie said.
Like I said, I planned on doing it when I /in-ed the newbie queue. If you think I'm scum, then you think I'm scum. I can't do much to defend myself if you haven't put up a case against me. Speaking of:Charlie wrote:Hmm, interesting indeed. What do you say if I tell you that I think that you were told to do that in your Mafia Night-talk? (Night 0, or pre-game)gxw wrote:Hmm well this is my first game on this site, and I've only skimmed through some other recent newbie/mini theme games so far, and I didn't see anything like this in those. I planned to do my first post like that as soon as I /in-ed the newbie queue, for the reason below.
To Twisted and Charlie:I did the multiple votes thing in order to gauge reaction or lack thereof to it. Clearly I had some interesting results.
You have said very little about it too. What do you make of the situation?Charlie wrote:So you're being mute on the matter. Um hmm.Mute wrote:My input on the GXW / Spoon debacle - pure silliness. I won't bother with commenting on it further than that as it is, as I said, pure silliness. Not going to put a vote down til I've solid/concrete reasons for doing so.
Do you care to explain this? You say you've seen this sort of thing, then think that I was told to do it in a private QT. Do you think someone else in this game did the same thing in a different game and told me to do it? I am actually curious to where else you have seen this, because I would like to see look at it too.Charlie wrote:
Waitaminute. I'm sure I've seen this sort of thing before. You'd best explain before I go looking for it.
I did exactly what he said one should do in RVS. I placed my vote on a player, even if I did it multiple times, I still placed my vote on a player. I also felt like he was correct in saying that a bad scum should react badly to it. And it seems to me that he reacted badly to it, HoSing me, making a considerably substantial post about it, and calling it "very scummish".Twistedspoon wrote: GXW, your post is scummy in that it completely denies the point of the RVS. You're supposed to start a wagon going by placing a vote on one of the players. If the player is (bad)scum then they should react badly to it and crack under the pressure.
I'm not sure what you are asking. Are you asking what I think about going to find where else it has happened? Or something else?Charlie wrote: I have a few ideas where to look for it, but I really think it isn't worth the effort over such a small matter. What do you think?
A lack of reactions to my post are results too.Twistedspoon wrote: Care to share?
The only results I saw was myself commenting on what was a scummish way of voting and then being accused by you becuase I FoS'd you.
No, no, no. I ment the other people who didn't even acknowledge my post are results too, not just those who responded to my post.KingTwelveSixteen wrote:gxw wrote:...
And it seems to me that he reacted badly to it, HoSing me, making a considerably substantial post about it, and calling it "very scummish".
That's why I voted for him
...
A lack of reactions to my post are results too.
He can't have both a lack of reaction and a bad reaction to it with substantial posting simultaneously.