Generalities are easier to remember than specifics. And I hate people demanding that votes be placed, so we can both be unhappy together!Magua wrote:Bella: Null-to-town. I hate the vote withholding thing gone over in 580. I have circled and underlined Bella's "If you try looking again, I'd look at more recent games than not recent games, because I've really hardened against the notion that you should have your vote on someone at all times over the last 6-12 months or so." in 580 vs "I don't really have the time to spend researching my own behavior for you and the only other game that jumps to mind is ongoing and thus is useless. Umm... there might be something in Secret Invasion mafia about how I use my votes, but I don't remember that very well because of the reasons I replaced out of it." when Farside tries to actually look it up.
That said, Bella's early attack on Battousai and second place on the Battousai wagon is a heavy towntell. Bus, bus, yeah, possible, etc, but to do it so early and so out of the blue, I'm not buying.
Aside from the "third suspect" thing, which I'm unconvinced has any merit to it, this is a pretty strong case against farside. At the very least, it merits reevaluating farside because I had her solidly down as town up 'till this point.ConSpiracy wrote:A TLDR
1. Although saying Nacho was certainly scum and would be lynched, she shifted her attention from him to Andrew.
2. Farside bussed Battousai at start, then defended him, then got him as her third suspect (which is a scumtell), then tried to get through an AntB lynch instead of a Battousai lynch. This all if heavily implying a farside-battousai scumteam.
3. She gave us some big scumtells day 2, such as wanting to know Egg's frame of mind and posting AntB couldn't fake-claim before he claimed.
I find the contrast between farside's defiant player descriptions when she quotes them with the comple4te surrender she makes in going back to AntB the second she's challenged for forgetting about him entirely intriguing.farside22 wrote:I was waiting for looker to respond to my questions. I missed that he replaced out.the deluded LH wrote:I think it's safe now to say that the answer is yes. And why would this happen? A claimed VT has less value to town than an unclaimed town, so if she were town, she'd push even more. While on the contrary, mislynching an unclaimed town, or getting another claim, is so much more tempting...
And yes I do still think AntB is scum. I'm sure my last post where I point out Batt's interactions was missed, since no one said I missed Broken (which I realized after I left).
unvote:
vote: AntB
This is quite OMGUSish, and the reasoning for suspecting Smashbro's replacement doesn't work.farside22 wrote:Magua wrote:@Farside:Opinion on Conspiracy please.
Based on SoTS's play and Batt's comment I would say likely scum. Conspiracy only made one case, but hasn't stated anything on anyone else. I would say in terms of the case, it's a well thought out case. I could have made the case on myself (as even I saw things in my play I would call scummy).
I would like to also note I don't care for SoT's signing in for other games, but stating he is too busy to play in this one. It sets me on edge as he did it more under pressure, which again looks scummy.
lord_hur wrote:@Egg: I still don't get why you exclude Looker from your list. I reread you, and you said you see many interactions between Battousai and Looker, but, rereading Looker's ISO, I can't find a single line directed to Battousai...
That's because Looker only posted three times between Batt replacing in and being lynched, and he did reference Batt - placing him equal with Nacho on the third tier of his little color coded chart thing. I mean, you could try and link them together with this, but I thinkg a more reasonable explanation is that Looker wasn't active enough at that point for them to get much chance to interact.lord_hur wrote:Battousai also only mentions Looker once, and just to say he has played with him before. Sorry about the double post.
The results are less important than the mindset and methods. You're capable of trying to look for scum, yet you are not.Archer wrote:Remind me, how many scum did I actually find in that game? Zero? So how is finding zero scum an indication that I know how to hunt and what to look for, and that I shouldnt change something about how I play in order to be a better townie?farside22 wrote:If you can scum hunt in one game. You can't say you can't do it another game. It's BS excusesArcher scum wrote:2) I honestly cant believe you are still pushing the whole meta based on one single game thing. I really have nothing more to say on this. If you cant fathom how basing a players entire playstyle on one single game is faulty then there is no point arguing. Plus, you dont even know how I played in that one single game that I played before coming to this forum, and yet you are making conclusions based on it? Please tell me exactly how with one game here, and one somewhere else that you have no clue of, you come to my current playstyle as being a scum read? Manufacture away!
This is an immesnsely stupid argument and you should be ashamed for making it.lord_hur wrote:Well, it seems farside22 forgot that the VT PM was posted by the mod at the start of the game (and it didn't hit me either, until now).
It doesn't look to me at all like what farside22 soft-claimed, as it doesn't mention that voting is the only thing VT can do. I doesn't mention vote at all, actually.Vanilla Townie Role PM wrote:Open 272: Near-Vanilla
You are a Vanilla Townie. You have no abilities or actions. Please confirm in thread.
Blech. UNVOTE: AntB, VOTE: farside22