You are missing the point. If IS thinks both Coug and Xalxe are scum, then its not bad to vote for one and restate his suspicion on the other. Having a stronger case is irrelevant in the context of a wagon with a lot of momentum.DemonHybrid wrote:I feel as if the xalxe suspicion has been a constant backup. He sort of rides along on his SC vote while making a stronger case against Xalxe, yet not voting for him. I don't find it authentic; somethings off.populartajo wrote:DemonHybrid, whats wrong with having FoSes and Votes in the same post?
Also if IS thinks both Xalxe and Coug are scum, whats wrong on him restating his Xalxe suspicion?
And yes, a majority of cases where FoSes and votes happen in the same post, it's bad news. That's for mafia discussion and not here though. It's certainly not the basis of my argument, as IS did it all bandwagon.
Also, link me to those cases where FoSes and votes in the same post mean bad news.