Mini 1123 - The Walking Dead - Game Over

[vezokpiraka]

You gave her the link to the QT. She can do anything with it. Not posting a QT because someone might see your scum play is bullshit. They know they did bad and they don't want to share the QT.

It's like giving someone a cake and telling them not to eat it. Forever.

[Wraith]

You were the easiest mislynch ever bro

At least you had an excuse this time. Fate's just an overzealous jerk and Jack's his perfect clone.

[Amrun]

You were playing scummy, bro. Sorry.

[chesskid3]

I voted against it because I don't want more loldrama
Rufflig is against it for reasons of his own
IT's not fair to either of us to link to it

[Wraith]

You were playing scummy, bro. Sorry.

I MADE FOUR POSTS

[vezokpiraka]

It's not fair to us not to link to it. It's not like you came up with a theory that will remake mafia as we know it. Shut up and let us see the QT.

[Amrun]

You were playing scummy, bro. Sorry.

I MADE FOUR POSTS

Four bad posts.

But the lynch went way too quickly and I was pissed about it.

[Faraday]

-Starbuck did a vengeful catty bullshit play but not BLACKLIST worthy because she didn't completely ruin the game

If it's not blacklist worthy then what the fuck is? I'm serious, what do you blacklist for as a mod?

[CSL]

Actually, I got banned for 2 days for my first offense.

IMO, this is more lenient than mine. -_-

[Starbuck]

I can understand repeated offenses being blacklist-worthy, not one.

[GreyICE]

-Starbuck did a vengeful catty bullshit play but not BLACKLIST worthy because she didn't completely ruin the game

If it's not blacklist worthy then what the fuck is? I'm serious, what do you blacklist for as a mod?

Lessee, collaborating out of game, spamming the thread, blatant trolling and ignoring gameplay, real life threats, posting in thread after death, those would all be WAY worse.

[Faraday]

Lol @ spamming the thread being worse. Gimme a fucking break. Posting in thread after death isn't any worse (depending on what you say obv, outing your scumteam after death would be worse), the others are all site ban worthy imo (although blatant trolling and ignoring gameplay are unprovable).

[Faraday]

I mean, real life threats are worse, but then again going and killing the mod irl would be worse too, that doesn't mean what Starbuck did isn't blacklist worthy.

[Faraday]

I can understand repeated offenses being blacklist-worthy, not one.

Why? If someone ruins a game of mine why would I ever ever ever let them have the opportunity to that again? Note: I'm not suggesting you should be site banned at all, I do think that's too harsh.

[Starbuck]

Because I would hope that my longevity on the site would prove otherwise.

[Faraday]

I think your reaction in this thread has left a sour taste in my mouth too. I mean, if it happened to you, I'm sure you'd be fucking mad too. (It has happened to me)

Whatever, I don't see why you should expect tony to be 'lenient', it's not like you're banned from all games.

[Starbuck]

I understand that.

I just don't see why the QT can't be shown, especially with other members of this game asking for it.

[Faraday]

Well, I've no opinion on that at all.

[Fate]

You were the easiest mislynch ever bro

At least you had an excuse this time. Fate's just an overzealous jerk and Jack's his perfect clone.

Your play was shit. It usually is.

[Fate]

-Starbuck did a vengeful catty bullshit play but not BLACKLIST worthy because she didn't completely ruin the game

If it's not blacklist worthy then what the fuck is? I'm serious, what do you blacklist for as a mod?

She had an emotional reaction..and even then didn't COMPLETELY ruin the game by doing something like posting the Cult QT link in thread, or naming all her buddies.. or whatever.

I blacklist for flaking, ruining the game through posting of Role PMs (aka scum role PMs), talking about the game outside the thread with obvious intent to ruin said game, and a few others I'd deal with as I came along.

[xRECKONERx]

Starbuck shouldn't be banned. If TonyMontana wants to blacklist her from his games, that's his prerogative as a mod. But to put her on sitewide probation is fucking ridiculous. Yes, her play was sheisty, but chesskid's play of recruiting her just to bus her was almost equally as sheisty.

[xRECKONERx]

I can understand repeated offenses being blacklist-worthy, not one.

Also, this, seriously.

Starbuck has been on the site for two years and I've played in many games with her/she's played in many of my games. This ONE emotional response to chesskid being a fucking prick is understandable, and it's not like she's drmyshottyizsik or chesskid who goes and threadshits in every single game they play in... and yet they're not blacklisted.

[Amrun]

"Threadshit" may be my new favorite word.

[TonyMontana]

Starbuck shouldn't be banned. If TonyMontana wants to blacklist her from his games, that's his prerogative as a mod. But to put her on sitewide probation is fucking ridiculous. Yes, her play was sheisty, but chesskid's play of recruiting her just to bus her was almost equally as sheisty.

Starbuck's play wasnt' "sheisty", she SOLD OUT HER GROUP. chesskid played to win. starbuck played to make her whole team lose.

"This ONE emotional response to chesskid being a fucking prick is understandable"

I honestly can't comprehend the defense of Starbucks actions. Yes, I understand she didn't like being recruited and shit upon. But you know what, tough shit, it doesn't give you the right to fuck over your alignment.

[Starbuck]

Thank you for admitting that I was recruited and shit upon, now can the QT be opened so everyone else can see that too?