it's alright you misread me, it happens. BP needs to claim...farside22 wrote:@shadow:
First your right I miss read your post on the BP claim. I retract that you wanted it day 1.
Second your reasons for GB was first policy
Then you stated the following:What made you say this? I understand the sheeping (he wasn't the only one to do so) but why assume framer?Yes, more sheeping, no reads of your own, no content
likely framer right here bros and hos
I do see BG has not said much of anything. Do you think he would buss his scum buddy like he did as scum?
Finally what happened with you this:
Fate unvoting off of the Espeonage wagon is scummy to me
I know I'm doing it, but I wanted to see a hammer on that...
I will revote Espeonage at any time that people address
Are you still suspicious?
on GB: Sure... at first, it was policy, because SS is detrimental to the town. Then, I felt like this was wrong to do, because I have been in that situation before. Then, I actually read them in iso, and found them scummy, which I made a post about involving all 4 of their posts. How many times can I quote 4 posts? I don't see how you can ask me to make more of a case than I already have. Letting someone replace in here will just give them wiggle room, but it might be what we have to do if they don't contribute (and noone seems to be willing to lynch them but CryMeARiver and myself). I said they were "likely framer" just for flavor/to be cute, hence the bros and hos following it. 50/50 shot if they're scum now, so I look like a genius, and you fishing for this information out of me reads suspiciously. Basically, their 4 pitiful posts are actually even scummy; I don't see how you can be so scummy in like 5 lines
@MoI: I didn't realize the wagons were even
-Furcy
