Twistedspoon wrote:shrug
it says my alignment is town, and that's what matters
Huh. I think I've found a tell of yours.
Twistedspoon wrote:shrug
how can I scumhunt when I'm defending myself.
Anyways, scum would want me to defend myself; it distracts me from scumhunting.
Twistedspoon wrote:shrug
i don't have to defend myself 5 pages into the game.
I don't see what your point is
A 'shrug' immediately preceeds a post where you are under-pressure, being attacked, and grasping at straws. I would say it sets out a 'panicky' mindset. Largely what follows a 'shrug' post is a load of nonsense.
What's odd is that all that provokes this 'shrug' post is:
Amrun wrote:That sounds like a scummy role, tbh.
This somehow makes him revert to the 'shrug' mindset - panicking. This only really makes sense if he were scum - and I think it's very possible that he is scum who, upon being requested for a claim, panicked, and claimed his scum role except town-aligned (which is why he panicks yet again when Amrun points out it makes more sense as a scummy role).
I am strongly inclined to believe that the candy 'taking' mechanic, if it exists (which I believe it probably does), will be scum-aligned.
Zyrconium wrote:To be specific, there's no doubt in my mind he's telling the truth about his role, his alignment however is still questionable.
Sums up my thoughts perfectly.
Amrun wrote:She is a zoo visitor and the flavor in the beginning makes it seem like one of the zoo visitors are the murderers.
Just FYI, I disagree with this reasoning. The 13 suspicious characters refers to all of us, regardless of whether we're zoo visitors or candy animals.
mb53 wrote:I believe twisted's claim. Multiple reasons. One, is I doubt scum would be able to make up such a role. Two, my gut town read. Three, I re-read the thread, and found that zyr's vote on TS is even more bullshit than I thought it was.
I'm not following you here.
1) Scum might not have to make up such a role. It could genuinely be a scum role.
2) This is very, very dodgy. Firstly, I'm pretty sure this is confirmation bias: "I reckon he's town, so his claim must be true." Perhaps if your town-read was supported by evidence and was reasoned, but a gut read? No. It also contradicts your earlier,
non-gut
stances on him:
mb53 wrote:Dropping my town read down to a could-go-either-way read (null).
mb53 wrote:Meh. Less than adequate defense. Keeping you at null.
mb53 wrote:TS is getting scummier by the post >_>
Pretty much the only thing to come up since then has been Twistedspoon's claim. Why has his claim made you revert to your gut read over your reasoned read?
3) This is not even a reason for believing Twistedspoon's claim.
I want to see how the lurkers react to the Twistedspoon case and other stuff, and I think we need to explore the mb53 avenue. I think it will also help to see how Twistedspoon reacts to it.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: mb53
@ Toasty: Did you really intend to hammer before we'd heard back from everybody?
Benmage: First, for the sake of irony. I'm going to illustrate how completely idiotic and hypocritical scumhunter is.