On the topic of the missing kills (since everyone wants to apparently discuss it …)
At least one if not two of the follow happened last night –
1. The Mafia chose to No-kill.
2. The Evil Angel chose to No-kill.
3. The Mafia or Evil Angel chose to attempt to kill AGar who was bulletproof
4. The Mafia or Evil Angel attempted to kill someone protected by the Doctor
5. The Evil Angel attempted to kill the Pyromaniac.
All this means is that we have no clue what happened and speculating isn’t a good idea at this juncture.
--
AGar wrote:I'm saying I never received a PM instructing me to pass it on.
I'm hesitant to go with a medic claiming because I might not be able to pass it on.
Good posting …
I suspect that since you were informed at the start of the Night that you had received it you will be prompted to pass it at the start of N2.
--
Fate wrote:Elaborate on your second part? Questions about his claim wut? I don't see any downside from a bulletproof confirmed doc.
What I was inferring is the fact that a counter-claim of the Doc creates a situation where we might not be able to pass the bulletproof vest to someone. Not a great likelihood, IMO, but within the realm of possibility.
--
LMP wrote:Unvote
Vote: Shadow
Before we go aiming for VIs what do you think of the Farside case?
--
Espeonage wrote:@ MoI: Looks like a good case. Not going to join it though. I am actually going to do a notetaking reread sometime over the weekend
If you like the case, why aren’t you joining the wagon?
That reminds me .. thanks to your unsubtlely there
UNVOTE: Espeonage
VOTE: Farside
--
Shadow wrote:Furcolow here, is anyone against the thought of AGar being confirmed town at this point?
Unless he’s counterclaimed of course not … why bother asking?
Shadow wrote:we have a doctor, a dead hooker, and 2 power roles that are ripe to be claimed
Have you carefully thought throught the implications of a Mass-claim? I’m completely serious about this question … have you run numbers and considered variables?
--
Farside wrote:Right lets bypass everything scummy he does and call it newb.
I sense a scum connection here folks.
Nice straw-man. Saying I don’t find 95 scummy at all doesn’t mean what you infer here.
You’ve never said specifically what about 95 was scummy. I’d like you to site specifically what that is in post 95. Put it on record.
Farside wrote:Also, still waiting on a Vig claim
Insert face-palm pic here ….
--
NoPoint wrote:@Maggy: Just look at his posts and stop being nosy for fuk sake xD and stop calling me fail for the sake of it =.=
I’m not calling you fail for the sake of it. I highlighted exactly the glaring holes in his assumptions.
NoPoint wrote:I'd have to agree with Fursy that it's odd for Espy to phrase it like that.
You agree that it is odd. Great. Are you honestly suggesting, as Furc is, that Espeonage specifically typed a sentence directly saying to his partner “Fate is good at catching us as scum” as opposed to using odd phrasing to say “Fate is good at catching scum for us”?
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.