Mini 1139 - Monastery Mafia

[Crazy]

Albert, you said you thought Exe was bussing Vittorio. If you still think that, are you in support of a Vittorio lynch?

I want to lynch Exe. Vittorio tomorrow.

I'd probably lynch Exe if he hadn't claimed a power role. If Exe is town, there's a small chance that he might protect someone that needed it and then die in their place. Exe dying instead of some obv-town person = good.

[Klazam]

Crazy right.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Unvote, vote Vittorio

[Pim]

The Nikola wagon sucks. Bad logic =/= scum, and there's no way he's faking his post restriction - no scum would come up with the "broken nose" thing out of nowhere.

It is when 'bad logic' tries to take down possibly confirmed players. Other than that, process of elimination.

Krazy still needs to paraphrase what his claimed role says about the same role being town (Not taking 'see post ...' as answer). And he now also needs to explain why it's only now that he uses Percy's 'lurking' as scummy.

Why not Vittorio? I'd rather not force another role claim out today, and he claimed Vanilla.

If you're dead set against Vittorio, though, I'd still prefer Pim to Nikola. Or myself, for that matter.

And this is so scummy.

[Empking]

Vote Count 12

Albert B. Rampage
Krazy
Crazy
Vittorio Salamdien (3) - Exe, Crazy, Albert B. Rampage
Pim (2) - Krazy, Klazam,
Exe (2) - Nikola Žigić, Vittorio Salamdien
Klazam
Nikola Žigić (1) - Pim,

Not Voting:

5 to lynch

[Krazy]

Vote Pim

Scumplaining scum.

[Pim]

Klazam, your turn before Krazy gets too suspicious.

[Klazam]

Same PM.

vote pim

[Pim]

I'm talking about paraphrasing the part where it states that the other is town. 'Same role' doesn't paraphrase.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Vote Count 12

Albert B. Rampage
Krazy
Crazy
Vittorio Salamdien (2) - Exe, Crazy
Pim (2) - Krazy, Klazam,
Exe (3) - Albert B. Rampage, Nikola Žigić, Vittorio Salamdien
Klazam
Nikola Žigić (1) - Pim,

Not Voting:

5 to lynch

There is a mistake in this VC, I am voting for Vittorio.

[Krazy]

Same

PM

vote Pim

[Crazy]

It is when 'bad logic' tries to take down possibly confirmed players. Other than that, process of elimination.

Krazy still needs to paraphrase what his claimed role says about the same role being town (Not taking 'see post ...' as answer). And he now also needs to explain why it's only now that he uses Percy's 'lurking' as scummy.

Lol at the irony there. You're accusing Nikola of trying to take down "possibly confirmed players" (whatever the heck that means), when you're beating the dead horse with the Krazy thing. Think about it - if Klazam says there are two mostly mute monks, and Krazy is the only other player to claim that, then doesn't that tell you something?

Looking back, Nikola's logic

does

actually make sense in context, with the limited information available at that time. He said his "I think mafia were told that two people have broken noses" thing before Klazam said he was a "mostly mute monk." So he thought that ONE of Krazy/Klazam was scum, which would make sense THEN.

I'm not voting for Nikola today - I have no reason to believe he is scum. I'm not voting for Krazy or Klazam today. I'm not voting for Albert today, because there's no point in lynching him until Vittorio has already flipped scum. I'm not voting for Exe today because he claimed a power role. If neither you nor Krazy/Klazam will help me lynch Vittorio, then I'll be forced to vote for

you

since there's simply no one else to vote for!

You're scummy enough, trying to go for the Nikola wagon without much basis at all. And the fact that you completely blew off the Vittorio wagon makes me think you're likely his partner. Or it could be you/Exe, like I originally thought.

Would I rather lynch Vittorio today? Yes, because his scumminess is more apparent and obvious than yours. But if 3 people are completely refusing to vote for him, then I have little choice in the matter.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Unvote, vote Pim

L-2

[Exe]

Been a crazy weekend. Catchup post tomorrow.

[Empking]

Vitorrio has been prodded

[Exe]

I'm talking about paraphrasing the part where it states that the other is town. 'Same role' doesn't paraphrase.

Alright, so here's my catchup. Basically the only thing that has happened since my last post is this sort of thing.

Pim is spamming the thread with mostly setup-related questions. He hasn't been scumhunting in the SLIGHTEST. It's noise generation, active lurking, etc.

This quoted post takes the cake though. What are you trying to prove here? That one of Klazam or Krazy is lying to the other? The chances of that are insanely slim, especially since the ONLY other person with a post restriction hasn't counter-claimed.

The ONLY possibility is that they are both scum. There is absolutely no chance that one is scum and the other is town. And for someone who is pushing a bad-logic case, this is hypocritical.

Since Vitto has decided to lurk his way to survival, I'm perfectly happy with lynching Pim-scum.

Unvote. Vote: Pim

[Exe]

Oh and thats L-1

[Crazy]

I'm actually finding myself agreeing with Exe, what do you know?

Pim, what's your claim?

[Klazam]

PIM- CLAIM!

[Krazy]

inb4 fakePR.

[Klazam]

*tumbleweeds rolling*

[Albert B. Rampage]

Hammer now?

[Crazy]

I'm almost bored enough to do that, but I'll wait a little longer for a claim.

[Klazam]

Claim first....

[Crazy]

Posting just in case the "..." meant you had something more to say.

But yes, definitely claim first.