Mini 1135: Deadmines - DONE. PRAISE AZEROTH.

Starbuck · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:18 am

Since it looks like Kai and smargaret are setting the cruise control for a lynch on me, I better get working on my re-read so I can give my fellow townies some input.

Kairyuu · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:19 am

Oh, and Reck, as I believe I already mentioned, she voted Mae BEFORE Mae's claim, so any excuse she makes about an "overpowered" claim is backpeddling.

Starbuck · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:20 am

Kairyuu wrote:Oh, and Reck, as I believe I already mentioned, she voted Mae BEFORE Mae's claim, so any excuse she makes about an "overpowered" claim is backpeddling.

I did vote her before that, and I'm not denying that.

So how is it backpedaling?

inHimshallibe · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:20 am

Official Day 3 Vote Tally

9 players remain; 5 votes needed for a lynch.

Maemuki (2)

- Starbuck, Parama

Starbuck (2)

- Smargaret, Kairyuu

Yet to vote (5): Xreckonerx, Endertwofour, Maemuki, Sathoris, Antihero

===================================================

GAMEWIDE NOTICE:

Given the pace of this game, I am open to speeding my process times if everyone is OK with some tighter deadlines.

Kairyuu · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:22 am

Oh, and as we now have a counterclaim situation, anyone who does not vote either me or Starbuck in their next post will be bereted thoroghly.

ninja: Because during one of your attempts to dodge my question (which you STILL haven't answered) you claimed that such was the reason you voted her. Post 304 to be exact.

Kairyuu · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:23 am

@Inhim: I'd be fine with that.

smargaret · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:23 am

Okay. So before Mae claimed, as in WHEN YOU VOTED HER, why did you vote for her?

EBWOP: Kairyuu, why is it that every single time I try to post, I get the post review screen and it's you saying the exact same thing as me?

Kairyuu · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:24 am

@smargaret: Because you're using your brain.

Starbuck · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:25 am

Mod: I unvoted Mae in this post. Apologies, I should have put it on a separate line.

And tighter deadlines? We lynched in 3 real days on Day 1, and 4 real days on Day 2. For MS, that's pretty damn quick.

Starbuck · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:26 am

smargaret wrote:Okay. So before Mae claimed, as in WHEN YOU VOTED HER, why did you vote for her?

Because I attributed the block to her and I shouldn't have. Hence, my unvote and why I'm going to re-read.

Parama · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:26 am

unvote, vote: Starbuck

Kairyuu · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:28 am

@Parama: So . . . tracker result will be coming from who? You're a 2/night inventor?

Parama · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:28 am

I'm waiting on a response from the mod - please don't lynch before that. It shouldn't take very long though so.

Parama · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:29 am

Bzzt, rolefish more. I didn't give out a track last night.

smargaret · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:29 am

So, when you said your vote for her was because her claim was overpowered, you were backpedaling. And then when you start catching heat for it, you unvote, but if you really believed she was overpowered WHY UNVOTE?

Starbuck · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:31 am

smargaret wrote:So, when you said your vote for her was because her claim was overpowered, you were backpedaling. And then when you start catching heat for it, you unvote, but if you really believed she was overpowered WHY UNVOTE?

More misrepresentation.

Please quote where I said my vote on her was FULLY BECAUSE she was overpowered.

Antihero · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:31 am

Kairyuu wrote:@Parama: So . . . tracker result will be coming from who? You're a 2/night inventor?

...where did this line of logic even start?

Kairyuu · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:32 am

Very well. Unlike some people, I know how to wait when asked.

unvote

Ninja: Fair enough. I'm still curious though, since I don't see how you could know that there was a track if you didn't send it out (kind of like how I wanted to know how you knew that a kill was blocked).

Kairyuu · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:32 am

@Antihero: Parama stated that he KNEW that there was a tracker result coming, but yet he claimed to have given me the kill I used on Bub. Hence, logical progression.

smargaret · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:33 am

Starbuck, if it wasn't FULLY BECAUSE she was overpowered, why did you only list that as your reason, and even more so why did you unvote?

You're claiming misrepresentation when it isn't there as an excuse to get out of answering my questions.

Starbuck · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:34 am

Also, I went back to re-read from the start of day and did realize (after it was pointed out) that I was linking the block to her unfairly.

You have made plenty of mistakes over the past few days and have admitted to them. How come when I do the same (make a mistake and admit to it), you act the complete opposite?

Starbuck · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:35 am

smargaret wrote:Starbuck, if it wasn't FULLY BECAUSE she was overpowered, why did you only list that as your reason, and even more so why did you unvote?

You're claiming misrepresentation when it isn't there as an excuse to get out of answering my questions.

Again, quote where I said that I voted her SOLEY FOR THAT REASON.

You CAN'T.

WHY?

BECAUSE YOU ARE WRONG.

God, I feel like Fate.

Kairyuu · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:37 am

@Starbuck: It might be because it took several pages of TWO PEOPLE asking you the same damn question to get a straight answer out of you, and that answer was "oops, I messed up, let me reread." In smargaret's case she either caught her own mistakes shortly after making them, or a single comment was enough to get her to realize it.

Also, you're playing on technicalities again, and it's really bothering me. Post 304. Read it. TELL ME HOW IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE INTERPRETED.

inHimshallibe · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:37 am

Re: "deadlines" - nothing would be changed for the Days... I mainly meant Night processing.

Starbuck · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Tue Mar 22, 2011 6:38 am

inHimshallibe wrote:
Re: "deadlines" - nothing would be changed for the Days... I mainly meant Night processing.

Oh ok, my bad. Then hell yeah. Go for it, dude.