tclawren wrote:Furcolow wrote:Im a bit behind, but general reads from my catchup:
I liked chkflip
I disliked crazy
you all wagonned the wrong crazy!
vote: crazy
Looking back at it, and with the addition of this post, I can pretty confidently say.
VOTE: Furcolow
If you explain exactly why you believe he is scum, then I might change my mind.
Also continued
FOS on Chk
and I'm not feeling a Llama wagon.
I read the game before I had replaced in
It was gut. I viewed the wrong crazy being waggonned. I was dissapointed in losing a town read. I don't like your vote on me, but at the same time I don't really give a fuck because you have provided no reasoning with it. What are you "looking back on"... the person I replaced? They seemed town to me, and I'm privy to the fact that I was right in realizing that. It sucks that they had a little... episode... with the site, but I can't do shit about that.
Have you seen any connections to our flipped scum, DRK?
I don't believe it is possible.
If you're saying I'm a werewolf, what's the team?
I'll tell you now your vote is wasted, worthless, and is misplaced unless you are scum.
Crazy wrote:I'd rather have a 3-1-1 than a 3-2, since if we accidentally mislynch in a 3-1-1, the game's not over. The "two confirmed townies" thing is silly and not even true. We'd be guaranteed
one
confirmed townie in a 3-2, AS WELL as in a 3-1-1. The logic you're using is akin to this:
Llama: Would you rather have a burger and fries or a hot dog and fries?
Crazy: I'll take a burger.
Llama: But with a hot dog you get fries!
Why do you not address my vote here?
I have a solid read on you as scum commandeering the town... scumandeering if you will. You are trying to boss everyone to have things your way - well, I'll tell you right now, this isn't going to work with me here. You will get in line or I will put you in line. I am very good at analyzing scenarios, so I know when someone is hiding behind that, which you are, hence why you're not addressing a few posts above where I voted you. Nice hiding, but it's not going to work. Sorry, bro.
Glass wrote:First thing: Hate the new avatar crazy D:
Now...
SSS, not all the events you said (36 or whatever) have the same probability of happening, but arguing this is still a moot point. Beggars can't be choosers. We will lynch scum without prejudice. If you personally want to put your focus on mafia/wolves go ahead, but I personally will be looking for both mafia and wolves.
My attention right now is on llama. He was essentially calling park out as obv scum and then totally released all pressure and stopped attacking a few posts later. Once DRK comes in llama really looses up. A slot does not suddenly go from scum to town, thus not commenting on anything that DRK is strange.
VOTE: llama(at L-2)
Tclaw is an interesting case, and I want to ask him a question:
tclaw wrote:
Looking back at it, and with the addition of this post, I can pretty confidently say.
VOTE: Furcolow
Looking back at what exactly? furcolow made zero contribution prior to this post. I will have you know that I have played with furcolow before and his play here (so far) has been pretty similar.
I didn't believe I had gotten my townie or mason role PM, but I had, so I didn't even know to be following this game. That is why I hadn't posted. I would definitely have been active, so that is my excuse for that, and my first post confirms it. I missed my role PM because it was tucked a few lines down under a paragraph TheAd had wrote to me about the situation revolving around how he was desperate to find players... I'm glad he found a few good ones.
Believe it or not, to further my claim, I actually have a lot of catching up to do. I'm trying to stem the tide by responding to things in the now, but I have pages to catch up on, and it doesn't look like I'm going to be able to do it tonight because my girlfriend is staying with me and I just stopped in for a moment.
Glass wrote:llama wrote:
If all the replacements do not post, scum has no idea what their reads are, and are shooting off what they think the general reads for the town is as opposed to cleaning out someone or using it as a tiebreak due to who they suspect. Makes the scum have less info for thier kills.
This is the worst argument ever. By that logic we should hammer as quickly and recklessly as possible so that the mafia/wolves don't have reads. Scum not having reads means that town won't have reads either.
I disliked this post too, but for different reasons than you. I don't dip into scum thinking as town past my reads.
Crazy wrote:*sigh* This is going to be the last time I'm going to talk about this crap, since it's totally going nowhere.
Llama, please stop using the number of confirmed townies in your argument! Both mafia and werewolves are equally capable of killing masons! We're just as likely to go into a 3-1-1 with 2 confirmed townies as we are to go into a 3-2 with 2 confirmed townies. Note my burger and fries reference. That's what you're doing.
A mafia lynch will lead us into a 4-2, with a NL after that leading us to 3-2. That is the ONLY thing that can happen.
A werewolf lynch could end up leading into a bunch of possibilities. The absolute worse is a 3-1-1, which is STILL better than a 3-2 due to the chance of a Prisoner's Dilemma scenario. In addition, there are better things that could happen after a werewolf lynch. If one scum team kills the other, we have a 4-1. If both scum teams kill each other, we get an instant win. None of that is possible if we go mafia-hunting today.
At the very worst, a werewolf lynch is approximately equal to a mafia lynch. At the best, it is much much better.
@Other people
- Is Llama a likely werewolf due to his insistence that we go mafia-hunting today?
***
And yeah, I didn't like that avatar very much either, Glass. I changed it back.
Notice this post?
werewolf is mentioned how many times?
he is dipping into "scumhunting" as mafia, and focusing only on werewolves.
I'm going to read him specifically when I'm catching up to see if he has any affiliation with DRK that will pop out at me as an associative tell.
As per your question...
Yes.
It's the same way you're a mafia because you're going werewolf hunting.
tclawren wrote:Tclaw is an interesting case, and I want to ask him a question:
tclaw wrote:Looking back at it, and with the addition of this post, I can pretty confidently say.
VOTE: Furcolow
Looking back at what exactly? furcolow made zero contribution prior to this post. I will have you know that I have played with furcolow before and his play here (so far) has been pretty similar.
Oh dear, that was vague of me. Sorry. I meant rereading aaah's posts. Aaah's posts seem sooooooo scummy to me right now. And Furculow desn't help hiimself much with a vote on one of my town reads. So he needs to explain himself. Now.
@Other people - Is Llama a likely werewolf due to his insistence that we go mafia-hunting today?
I have a strong feeling that this arguing is just a difference in opinion and theory and nothing more. In fact the reasons of the people jumping on this wagon are so ridiculous and unfounded I think it would be better to look at one of them, i.e. Smashbro and Glass, for potential scum.
Token, I don't have to explain myself until I catch up. It's gut, and he's going "werewolf hunting" as mafia. Your town read is because he SEEMS town... he's trying to lead the town as scum.
smashbro_of_the_SSS wrote:Just checking in really quick, but first off, sorry bout the first couple points llama. I looked back, and you're right. for some reason I could have sworn you voted Crazy with a C at one point, but guess not. I still don't mind leaving my vote on you. I don't particularly like the hammer, or your post leading up to it. Or telling people not to talk after the vote. Sure, it gives scum more to go on, but I think that if they wanted to go for someone who thinks they are scum, they would go for the people who are most likely to start something up, i.e. people who are around more and post more. So I don't think that would matter. I'd still like to keep some pressure on you, especially if I have no other top candidate.
Crazy, I don't know if it makes him more likely werewolf, but it's possible. It's not enough for me to definitely say he's more likely werewolf than mafia though.
Finally, Crazy and llama and anyone else , I really don't care much about the probability of everything, can we focus on actual hunting please?
I like this point... a lot. I didn't like your post until the bolded ending, but I like that. I hit on this already in this post.
Crazy is using numbers to hide behind. I analyze numbers as town all the time, and I quickly move on after people agree or disagree with me. He's not doing this, even going so far as to not reply to a vote on him.
I view the tclawren following and later jump as
town
.
Crazy not believing he can wagon LF switches and tries to lead again.. further indication he is scumandeering and trying to lead a witch hunt on a 3rd faction.. or should I say a werewolf hunt...
idc either way
my vote not only stands, it stays