Twistedspoon wrote:I'm not giving Kalofer a free pass for the posts you quoted. I'm not giving him one at all
What happened when I made a post with mysterious reasons again? Oh yeah.Twistedspoon wrote:I can't vouch for him, but this setup is very mysterious and I'm sure he has his reasons.
Twistedspoon wrote:hoppster is acting all suspiciousy.
Preview Edit: I'm starting to think Kalofer is a jester. Either that, or he's doing quite a good job of trying to attract a lynch to protect his scumbuddy. Not quite good enough though. Self-voting would be a good start, Kalofer.
Preview Edit 2:
In the first 3 lines, you are defending your response to Kalofer.Twistedspoon wrote:I'm not giving Kalofer a free pass for the posts you quoted. I'm not giving him one at all
I advised you ask him again for your information; I know nothing of it
But i did like some other parts of kalofers posts
why would I attack someone I believe to have the same role as me? If I believed them to be mafia, then sure, but otherwise why would I?
However, in the fourth line, you are clearly insinuating that you're not attacking Hazard because you believed him to have the same role as you. Yes, it's worded ambiguously, however, in context of my post, it's quite clear. No other logical interpretation is possible. Feel free to prove me wrong, but I'm quite sure I'm not wrong.
However, you didn't know Hazard's role at the time he had his mysterious reasons. You also showed you had no idea what he was talking about, so your reason for letting Hazard off is BS.