Mini 1139 - Monastery Mafia

[Nikola śigić]

I misunderstood...

[pod person]

fine.
why is mispresentation aka the intentional twisting of another person's words not a scumtell? its purpose is to make something look scummy when it isn't, and the poster knows it isn't. townies cannot misrep because they don't know for sure if any other person is scum or not; scum know exactly who all the townies are, though.

[Nikola śigić]

Past experience, ...

[pod person]

continue.

[Nikola śigić]

... "word twisting" ...

[Exe]

1. vittorio was not clueless - he knew exactly what abr was talking about. he asked "saint what manuscript" in order to confirm abr's full rolename, not because he had no idea what abr was talking about. you in fact have not told me how the evidence that i knew abr's rolename doesn't add up. this is evidence that you are intentionally trying to twist my words.

That was a good while AFTER he made a post stating that he in no way understood ABR's claim. He starts off by asking how we know Rampage is speaking the truth (how would Rampage know to make up EXACTLY the flavor that Vitto had? This suggests that Vitto didn't actually know Rampage's role)
Then he posts asking about what a saint manuscript is, and finishes the post saying "I'm still lost." Doesn't really read as knowing the role either.
It's not until MUCH later that he figures out what he actually seems to want to ask, which suggests that something dawned on him LATER. It does NOT lend itself to the interpretation that Vitto knew ABR's role all along.

2. you haven't even tried to defend yourself from my case. you have just screamed "his case is crap" and didn't say why. this is evidence that you know can't wiggle your way out of this one with a legitimate defense

My job is not to waste time defending myself point-by-point. It's to hunt and catch scum. Which is what I am doing.

3. you have two scum suspects. you are not voting either. this is evidence that you do not care who is lynched, as long as it is not you or your buddy.

We are in a precarious MyLo situation. I am taking time to gather information BEFORE placing a vote. There is absolutely nothing anti-town about it.


So please, stop twisting things around. I am not misrepping anything you are saying, I am only telling you exactly how it reads.
Also, my vote on you because it seemed like Vitto replaced yourself is a completely bullshit point. How exactly are you trying to make that appear scummy?


Now, Nikiola has posted, and the entirety of his suspicions are a random pot-shot theory? The scum = mutes? That's the best he can come up with? Now THAT is faux-scumhunting. And, it gives me enough information to be confident in a

Vote: Nikola

[Nikola śigić]

...rarely scumtell.

[Exe]

I think Nikola might be trying to suggest that "word twisting" is more often just a different interpretation, not an intentional scum-planned subterfuge. Is that what you are saying Nikola?

[Nikola śigić]

Essentially, yes.

[pod person]

but exe here is obviously trying to make my words into what they are not. i have explicitly pointed out the meaning of the posts where vittorio appears to be confused, and exe ignores it in favor of what it obviously is not.

[Nikola śigić]

Game over? ...

[Exe]

but exe here is obviously trying to make my words into what they are not. i have explicitly pointed out the meaning of the posts where vittorio appears to be confused, and exe ignores it in favor of what it obviously is not.

This is complete crap.
You give me the interpretation of Vitto's posts that YOU would of course prefer. However, I have also pointed out multiple reasons why Vitto's posts don't make sense with his claim.

This is not a situation of absolutes. Vitto's posts are NOT black and white one way or the other. But you are trying to somehow suggest that because I don't buy your argument, and because you believe that there's absolutely no other way in the entire universe that Vitto could have been full of shit, then I MUST be intentionally twisting words.

But that is simply not the case at all. I pointed out quotes that make it seem like Vitto is lying, or at least is not telling the full truth. Just because you claim he was honest (surprise surprise, Pod thinks the person he replaced is being honest!) doesn't somehow make any other argument null.

[Klazam]

Exe: unvote.

[Krazy]

unvote

Goodbye L-1.

[Klazam]

Podscum nightkill.....

[Nikola śigić]

Go on.

[Klazam]

....best possible...

[Nikola śigić]

Go on.

[Klazam]

...for him...

[Nikola śigić]

Go on.

[Klazam]

...look good.

[Nikola śigić]

Not really.

[Klazam]

Why not?

[Nikola śigić]

Implication was...

[Klazam]

Go on