Mini 1138 - Candy Zoo Mafia (Game Over!)

Charlie · Post Post #725 (ISO) » Sat Apr 02, 2011 6:43 pm

Vote Count 15

Nobody Special (3) - mb53, Kalofer, Stels
Hazard With a Glove (2) - Morthas, crazypianist1116
Morthas (2) - vezokpiraka, Hazard With a Glove
Zyrconium (1) - ToastyToast
vezokpiraka (1) - Hoppster
Stels (1) - Zyrconium
mb53 (1) - Nobody Special

Not voting: Amrun
Deadline is on Wednesday, 20th April at 1200 hours (GMT -5)

Zyrconium · Post Post #726 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 12:20 am

@mod: prod Stels and Kalo for us please.

@NS: elaborate... your case is currently weaker than a number of cases, including the case against you.

Charlie · Post Post #727 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:34 am

Stels and Kalofer have been prodded.

Morthas · Post Post #728 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:13 am

Well then, since i am obligated to ask before i get any form of response from everyone,

WHO IS FOR AND WHO IS AGAINST HAZARD TELLING US WHO HE TARGETED?

Anyone who is AGAINST, i will have to ask you to explain why exactly.

Ah, and no sorry, no scumlist just yet =/.

ToastyToast · Post Post #729 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 9:06 am

@Morthas: I am for it only if the person he targeted gets to L-1, or if he gets to L-1. That way we avoid giving scum any easy role information.

Morthas · Post Post #730 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 9:12 am

@TT: Could you specify what kind of role information do you hope to conceal?

Stels · Post Post #731 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:39 am

UNVOTE: NS
VOTE: Hazard with a Glove
Morthas logic wins >_>

Amrun · Post Post #732 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:52 am

ToastyToast wrote:@Morthas: I am for it only if the person he targeted gets to L-1, or if he gets to L-1. That way we avoid giving scum any easy role information.

Agreeing with this.

I hope to conceal revealing someone who definitely has goodies, for starters.

Amrun · Post Post #733 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:53 am

OH, and I forgot, I would like to know what Hazard's results PM is like, just without who he actually stole from.

ToastyToast · Post Post #734 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 12:47 pm

Morthas wrote:@TT: Could you specify what kind of role information do you hope to conceal?

Who should scum avoid targeting, given that Hazard took their ingredients away; What hazard can make (yes, I realize he's already denying that)

Hazard with a Glove · Post Post #735 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 1:40 pm

Amrun wrote:OH, and I forgot, I would like to know what Hazard's results PM is like, just without who he actually stole from.

I'd have to ask the mod.

Charlie, can I tell them?

Amrun · Post Post #736 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 1:52 pm

You can paraphrase it, you know.

Hazard with a Glove · Post Post #737 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 1:54 pm

It was one word.

Amrun · Post Post #738 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 2:27 pm

Oh, I see.

Best to ask the mod, then, I suppose.

Charlie · Post Post #739 (ISO) » Sun Apr 03, 2011 10:26 pm

Hazard with a Glove wrote:
Charlie, can I tell them?

If you got a PM from me, you can't quote it directly but paraphrasing is OK.

Kalofer · Post Post #740 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:04 am

YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I'm back.

so I've been reading this right, and I'm like duuuuude so many theories, disagreements and arguments. And you're all assuming these theories are correct and stuff it's just weird. Maybe if the urge comes I'll take my time to properly read these in an attempt to understand what the hell you funny bunnies are on about but for now I'll just say that I don't think you guys should concern yourselves so much with theories and stuff I mean you saw how many theories there were with TS and the one that seemed most right was soooooo wrong (ahem amrun and hoppster). And I think you guys should just open your minds to all the possibilities and chill a bit. Seriously, try smoking like a bag of weed before you post (or eating a lot of candy, it is a candy zoo after all).

mb53 · Post Post #741 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:23 am

@morthas

I would rather you say all of your arguments for why he

should

reveal.

Morthas · Post Post #742 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 6:44 am

How do i say this.... GO READ THE LAST COUPLE OF PAGES, im pretty sure i already posted it twice if not once. ALSO, stop avoiding my question.

mb53 · Post Post #743 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:34 am

Hey guess what, I could say the exact same thing to you.

mb53 · Post Post #744 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:35 am

Its much easier to respond to if it is in one place, rather than spread across multiple pages. Don't be stubborn.

vezokpiraka · Post Post #745 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:46 am

Sorry/ I was busy today.

I'll make the case and give some thoughts tomorrow.

Hoppster · Post Post #746 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:16 am

What's the case/suspicions on NS? ISOing him it just seems like he tunelled TS late D1 (which I did early D1, so if you're attacking him for that you should probably be attacking me as well), and his reasoning of Lynch All Liars, while not something I agree can be applied to every situation, I don't see why it's not a valid reason any less than Amrun's Role PM.

Hazard: if it's one word, use a synonym or something.

Going to re-read tomorrow and post some thoughts. I've been at a bit of a loss recently.

Amrun · Post Post #747 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:33 am

I think Kalofer's on a sugar high. This game is frustrating. Scum must be skipping.

mb53 · Post Post #748 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:51 am

Hoppster wrote:What's the case/suspicions on NS?

I wrote:So, for my NS vote, I didn't say why I think he is scum right away, because I was planning on pulling direct quotes, but he hasn't really said anything that I can find that is specifically scummy, it is rather just generally scummy play. He lurked a lot through day 1 (whether on purpose or on accident), then voted TS for LAL (which is say is a really easy way for scum to get on a wagon, because when the player flips town, scum can just say "Well he lied, why would I think he was town"), then didn't really do anything else.

Hoppster · Post Post #749 (ISO) » Mon Apr 04, 2011 9:52 am

Hoppster wrote:ISOing him it just seems like he tunelled TS late D1 (which I did early D1, so if you're attacking him for that you should probably be attacking me as well), and his reasoning of Lynch All Liars, while not something I agree can be applied to every situation, I don't see why it's not a valid reason any less than Amrun's Role PM.

He actually dug up the LAL himself, which is a sign of scumhunting. Lurking is null.

Still not convinced.