Open 296: MAFIA WINS GONNA TEACH YOU TO BURN

[lane0168]

/confirm

[lane0168]

VOTE LANE0618

cos no one else has

ThAdmiral replaces Lucresia. Welcome!

Votecount 1

Mozamis (1): Hero764
lynchking (1): Stefunny
Hero764 (2): Mute, Iecerint
Bella (1) :The_Kingpin
The_Kingpin (2): Bella, Nachomamma8
Stefunny (1): lynchking
lane0618 (1): mozamis
not voting: ThAdmiral, lane0618, MrTrow
With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

you guys don't want to do this, i am the vig. i have been leaving bread crumbs all day for you to pick up on... wait. no but here is my first

very glad i get to play with you all
i am very glad to get to play with you all
glad i get to play with you all
i am a 24 yr old male
lane is my last name
also, i'm pumped to play with you all
now lets get down to business
thanks for the oppurtunity to play with you all, i'm very glad
e

[lane0168]

oh schmuck...

OMGUS

vote:mozamis

[lane0168]

How can you.. wait, but.. there is no vig.....

so lost. =S

or IS there...

[lane0168]

"bursts into a throaty rendition of Don't Stop Me Now"

omg i love that song... wait, i think i'm thinking of ace of base's "don't turn around".

unvote

i am sorry if no one understands my humor when saying i have been leaving bread crumbs all day. consider the only other option was my confirm post lol.

btw is nachomamma like... sugar daddy?

[lane0168]

1) What's your time zone?
2) How 'bout them Cowboys?
3) Do you believe in curses?
4) Will you win this game?

1.)central standard time
2.)i prefer firefighters
3.)yes, the kirby puckett curse. and now minnesota can win 0 championships.
4.)that depends on if it ever gets going

do we not have anyone that can get this show on the road? i am not a leader and dont really know how to do so. otherwise i would.

question 5.) Is a gut read a good enough reason to vote for someone? why?

Votecount
Mozamis (2): Hero764, lane0618
Hero764 (1): Iecerint
Bella (2) :The_Kingpin, Stefunny
The_Kingpin (1): Nachomamma8
Stefunny (3): lynchking, Bella, ThAdmiral
lane0618 (1): mozamis
ThAdmiral (1): MrTrow
not voting: Mute
With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

[lane0168]

i just like to play mang

[lane0168]

not from answering the questions alone... but it could spark conversation i suppose?

[lane0168]

why is it important to know who was scum before the roll pm's were redistributed? they have changed.

[lane0168]

well i was mafia. hope it helps

[lane0168]

haha, figures none of them were

[lane0168]

I am weirded out by lane's choice not to disclose his former scumfriends.

please do not start this crap.

Were moz, mute, Kingpin or Hero scum with you? Those are the players for whom it may be relevant.

Was the question answered? yes... i said no, they weren't. It is not my duty to claim for anyone else thank you very much. Can you be thankful for me telling you and giving what you asked? yes... be weirded out that people aren't telling you themselves.. not that i'm not telling you for them.

back off Lec had to throw it in somewhere

[lane0168]

my choice was to answer the question as proposed to me to the best of my ability. this is the best way to answer ANY question in mafia imo. if i would have said who they were, trust me, there are plenty of people on this site that would be like "hmm, i didnt ask you who your scum buddies were, why did you feel the need to give more information that was asked of you? you could have let them answer... i find this interesting"

I still don't understand why you think its weird for me to answer my own questions, and let other people answer theres. and why you dont find it odd that no one else has answered for themselves.

King also got a pm that said he was mafia... his name wasn't in my pm. Did anyone else?

[lane0168]

that doesnt sound fun at all, wtf would we do all game? wait to win or lose?

[lane0168]

I think its completely idiotic to want someone to out who was on their previous scum team, instead of waiting to see if they are going to say it themselves. because if they didnt, it would be easy for me to ask why he didnt later in the game. or even a page or two from now. Don't you think it gives more information if they don't say it themselves and i know this fact? either way, you could have found out eventually in a MUCH more beneficial manner... i don't understand your impatience... but since you're so concerned with who was scum before the redistribution... it was lucresia, who has been replaced. and lynchking, who hasn't spoken since rvs.

[lane0168]

yes please... we need people, and by people i need everyone, to start posting... so far i have seen nothing worth noting, and we need to get this show on the road... or else a real good home town following and some shows right about here. either way, on the road, or right here, we need a show.

i really wish to vote to put on some pressure, butt fuck, i can't find a single reason so far... someone vote for me, start asking me questions, and then others comment on those answers, and maybe we can get somewhere.

[lane0168]

yess... ranger makes points that i have yet to pick up on and voice in this game... thankfully there are players that can do that within the first 5 pages of a game. my contributions usually start around page 10 when the good stuff starts. I agree with ranger. [jokes]although it is usually a scum tell to replace in also most scum vote at some point, which ranger just did. i've got my eye on him lol[/jokes]

vote:mozamis

[lane0168]

You're complaining about cases on you instead of scumhunting?

you probably replace "reasons" with "excuses" too huh?

when did defending yourself become complaining about cases?

My stance on king is irrelevent... but i'm pretty sure everyone has a right to defend themselves when people are voting for them without it being misrepresented as complaining... remember when you felt weirded out about me not giving up every bit of information? like i said before... stop posting stuff like this.

Why'd you vote for kingpin twice?

[lane0168]

To answer Ranger's question: I find Lane a bit suspicious. Didnt like his post 101 that much, particularly his "

someone vote for me"

comment.
Bit too eager to fit in as town?

His post 114 seems a bit "jokey, nervous scum" as well.
Althoug he does vote for me in that post, so I can see how it that looks a bit OMGUS from me.

Still, since thats all I really have atm,

VOTE LANE0168

i don't know that people trying to start conversation is all that scummy. and don't worry about the OMGUS, i dont really read into that crap, and frankly it annoys me when people call other people out on it, but i'm glad you were worried that you'd be called out on it and had a nice pre-defense.
Bit too eager to be defensive?

[lane0168]

well as far as i'm concerned, scum is not going to be that attimate defending ANYBODY, whether its town or a scumbud..

unvote

Why'd you vote for kingpin twice?

Are you suggesting this is a scumtell?

No i'm suggesting he voted twice, and was concerned about his unvote... just as king voted twice and was concerned with adding something.... what's the difference?i don't think either is scummy so it shouldnt be added in a case against them.

however, if king's crappy case has done anything, it has put pressure on him and made him look increasingly scummy. his defense blows. I'm glad he voted someone else to make ranger happy.

like IEC "the pattern starts with RVS, but it does not end there."

I will also be defending people who i think are being misrepresented along with mozamis. I feel the same way he does. misreps do nothing but make town people look scummy, and are unnecessarry on real scum. (specifically talking about calling his defense complaining... he's l-2, and we want to call him selfish for not having his thoughts on scumhunting?) shame be to the person who tries to stay alive.

[lane0168]

vote:no lynch

[lane0168]

"Why do fools fall in Luuuaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaghh..."
BAH.
keep your eyes on ranger and empking i reckon.
Thanks for a great game folks
ps don't worry Mod I wont post again!

Farewell sweet Moz.

wtf is this shit? since when do dead people speak? thanks for your input on ranger and empking? i have always been under the impression that once you're dead you shouldn't give anymore input... is that not how mafia is played online?

[lane0168]

wait, why did we figure out mozamis's alignment? what is going on in this game?

[lane0168]

i thought we only find out the alignment of people who are lynched. in another game, when a vig or scum killed someone, only they knew. those weren't basic though obviously

[lane0168]

vote:stefunny

[lane0168]

we got this game in the bag. as long as town manages to lynch only one scum, we should have 2 confirmed town and 1 mafia. and thats an obvi lynch

Votecount
RangeroftheNorth (2): Bella, lane
Lane (3) Empking, MrTrow, RangeroftheNorth
Empking (1): The_Kingpin
not voting (2): Hero, ThAdmiral
With eight alive it takes five to lynch.
Given the slower pace of today, several players have been prodded

[lane0168]

rather, manages to lynch AT LEAST one, not only lol. 2 would be ideal haha

[lane0168]

lol, well that sucks for ranger. i guess sometimes bussing IS the best policy

vote: Ranger

[lane0168]

I think Emp's actions make it clear he was setting a trap to catch scum eager to jump on an easy wagon. I think he succeeded.

right... which is why you just jumped on my wagon. thank you for proving your own point.

emp just had 3 posts, 3 votes.I am highly impressed with the confidence of his own scumhunting. I was saying that if stef would have not been so sweet to you and bussed you ranger, than you would not be in this predicament. stef's "buddying" doesn't look like buddying. it does look like she is pointing out the stupid logic of mozamis. nobody would notice in context of the current situation that was going on when it was said. turns out stef flipped scum, which makes her miniscule buddying of you much more relevant.

Ranger- "Couple it with the fact that lane hasn't done any independent scum hunting, and his quick jump onto a particularly poor bandwagon, and that's where I'm putting my vote."

would you care to show me the people that have done "independent scum hunting"? pretty sure it's no one if we're being honest. yeah people said a couple things on day one, but if you remember, we were following the cop. day's 2 and 3 were pretty quick. again thank you for proving your point. this time about the "particularly poor bandwagon". also, i'm looking at your iso? and i don't see any independent scum hunting of worth. but good point. and where was i quickly jumping from? naturally its a poor bandwagon, thats exactly what you would say if it was a particularly fantastic bandwagon.

@Trow, i believe stef to be ranger's partner. at the moment, emp's looking like a good candidate as well but may be a little too obvious which makes me consider him not being scum. thank you for the options and all, but you are def my second choice for ranger's partner, due to the fact you gave me the option of picking bella who i obviously am voting with and have shown no signs of incrimination... emp, which is the obvious choice... and myself. i also have to ask how that particular case on ranger was nullified so quickly? is it just a coincidence that you like the word particular and so does ranger? and that ranger mentioned i got sucked into the trap right after you mentioned it was a trap? or are you ranger's alternate? or is ranger your alternate? or did you just talk last night about how you should both use the word particular cause it would be awesome, right after you killed iec, and then rejoiced that he was the doc.

[lane0168]

Heh. That's a much better argument.

Unvote

Vote: Ranger

I don't remember and i'm too lazy too look at the top of the page... did you vote ranger before i did? then did you precede to call me too eager?i mean i'm pretty tired and all... oh right, it was that trap you set that i fell into. nevermind, [sarcasm]you're basically confirmed town[/sarcasm]

Don't be an idiot. Lane's vote wasn't rational. There was one argument and suddenly Ranger is certainally scum? Too eager.

you're shitting me right? I swear i just heard you say my vote wasn't rational. are you talking about my vote on ranger? that vote that i placed on ranger in post #281? that post that comes after #280? which is the post that you voted for ranger in? cause i'm confused.

[lane0168]

why are you voting for people you dont think are scum?

[lane0168]

@Mr trow, when i say too obvious, i mean playing too... how do you say, strongly? and inviting quite a bit of attention imo

@buttons, i believe the point that bella brought up was a valid point. more so apparently than empking. the point that stef was quick to say her partner wasn't scum and that replacing out isn't always a scumtell. well, the thing is, stef flipped scum. which makes it quite a bit more informative than if she had been town.

[lane0168]

I'm glad this new deadline is forcing these uninterested people into posting a lot more... oh wait, we're still on the same page