T-Bone (4) - Ellyssa, splitfarvle, Stels, Nachomamma8
Stels (3) - Rain, Quaroath, T-Bone
Not Voting (0)
With 7 alive it is 4 to lynch.
Or that you knew that wouldn't get NKed, anyway. How did you think they wouldn't get NKed, if you weren't involved in discussing who to kill or not kill, when you said the exact opposite near the start of Day 2 in #256, that,splitfarvle wrote: My strategy was to investigate those I didn't think would get NKed, Stels on N1 and Rain on N2. I was trying to walk a
fine line between saving Stels on D2 and revealing what I knew.
As to my vote, I'm waiting for Rain and Stels to come to a consensus and then I'll drop the hammer myself.
Outside of hinting I wouldn't be killed again.. if you were a cop, you DID expect that one of them may have been killed due to experience, so using your logic of investigating someone you didn't think was going to be NKed, T-Bone or Quaroath or barefoot/Nacho should have been your D1 investigation, not Stels. Especially since you had lingering doubts of T-Bone from D1, according to your ISO.splitfarvle in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2885392#p2885392]#256[/url] wrote:I was surprised that Jack got the nightkill, as I was mostly neutral towards him and I expected someone like Ellyssa, for her imo town playing, or Rain or Stels, for their relative experience, to get killed instead. Hell, I even expected myself to get nightkilled before Jack since I turn up as town in a few player's analyses.
That struck me as weird at the time as well, though I didn't quite grasp why then. It's obvious now though, while you can explain it as trying to avoid a lynch on Stels, wouldn't a cop try to convince one of those voting for him to vote for T-Bone and ending the day instead? Since you thought he was scum? Instead with under 48 hours to go to the deadline, you ponder the possibility of starting a new bandwagon on a scummy-looking Rain (Whom you now declare town because either he's scum and your buddy, or that he's town so that he feels vindicated and thus more inclined to vote with you), perhaps hoping due to inactivity that another partial bandwagon starts and the day ends in a no-lynch instead. It smells of playing for a draw, since it would make no functional difference to the outcome if Nacho hadn't posted, whether I was the one to swap and hammer Stels, as I said I would just after, or if you did.splitfarvle in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2931099#p2931099]#359[/url] wrote:Do we have a backup plan in case Nacho either isn't willing or able to drop the hammer before the deadline? Is anyone willing to switch their vote to avoid a No Lynch? I'd like to see Rain lynched before Stels, anyone agree?
To further expand on my N1 investigation, the wiki suggested I consider the future of the town instead of just who I thought was scummy. I decided that the mafia would kill players that probably wouldn't get lynched or that were an immediate threat to them. I also considered who might not be drawn out to post more through pressure (because of votes or D1 play) on D2 and thus slip through the cracks. Stels fit the criteria I set for myself.Ellyssa wrote:Or that you knew that wouldn't get NKed, anyway. How did you think they wouldn't get NKed, if you weren't involved in discussing who to kill or not kill, when you said the exact opposite near the start of Day 2 in #256, that,splitfarvle wrote: My strategy was to investigate those I didn't think would get NKed, Stels on N1 and Rain on N2. I was trying to walk a
fine line between saving Stels on D2 and revealing what I knew.
As to my vote, I'm waiting for Rain and Stels to come to a consensus and then I'll drop the hammer myself.
Outside of hinting I wouldn't be killed again.. if you were a cop, you DID expect that one of them may have been killed due to experience, so using your logic of investigating someone you didn't think was going to be NKed, T-Bone or Quaroath or barefoot/Nacho should have been your D1 investigation, not Stels. Especially since you had lingering doubts of T-Bone from D1, according to your ISO.splitfarvle in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2885392#p2885392]#256[/url] wrote:I was surprised that Jack got the nightkill, as I was mostly neutral towards him and I expected someone like Ellyssa, for her imo town playing, or Rain or Stels, for their relative experience, to get killed instead. Hell, I even expected myself to get nightkilled before Jack since I turn up as town in a few player's analyses.
Stels and Rain are sure of their own alignment, but not of each other's or mine. All I can do is convince them I'm telling the truth and vote along with them. Unless, of course, you're willing to vote for yourself or your scumbuddy Nacho. How about it?Ellyssa wrote:Furthermore, if you were cop, why would you bother waiting for them to come to a consensus? What consensus exactly? Which one is a "safer" mislynch (note, I don't know Nacho's alignment, not saying he's town) and thus which one is better to hop on, whether they believe the more pro-town or the scummier target you've picked? You have your two scum, the game is won, and voting one or the other wouldn't hurt.Thatshows you aren't certain of your information, which you would be if you were a cop.
I would think that rereading anybody's posts in a scummy light would make them look scummy. And I really don't see how this opinion jives with my D1 playing, remember muh? Or me building a case on Rain on D2?Ellyssa wrote:Rereading some of your posts in a scummy light, they seem to show you building a very carefully neutral stance, mostly agreeing with others opinions (and occasionally adding or rephrasing an argument on them) but generally only when others have already started attacking them.
This seems like a convoluted point you're trying to make. How exactly would I keep Stels from being lynched without claiming? The only way I could see was to provide an alternative that I thought was scummy and see if we could avoid either a No Lynch or lynching Stels. If I go to bat really hard for a townie on D2 without knowing there's a doc, all we get is one confirmed town on D3.Ellyssa wrote:That struck me as weird at the time as well, though I didn't quite grasp why then. It's obvious now though, while you can explain it as trying to avoid a lynch on Stels, wouldn't a cop try to convince one of those voting for him to vote for T-Bone and ending the day instead? Since you thought he was scum? Instead with under 48 hours to go to the deadline, you ponder the possibility of starting a new bandwagon on a scummy-looking Rain (Whom you now declare town because either he's scum and your buddy, or that he's town so that he feels vindicated and thus more inclined to vote with you), perhaps hoping due to inactivity that another partial bandwagon starts and the day ends in a no-lynch instead. It smells of playing for a draw, since it would make no functional difference to the outcome if Nacho hadn't posted, whether I was the one to swap and hammer Stels, as I said I would just after, or if you did.splitfarvle in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2931099#p2931099]#359[/url] wrote:Do we have a backup plan in case Nacho either isn't willing or able to drop the hammer before the deadline? Is anyone willing to switch their vote to avoid a No Lynch? I'd like to see Rain lynched before Stels, anyone agree?
It isn't a theory, it is fact that Rain, Stels, and I are town. You seem incredibly defensive now without me having tried to build a case at all. Why are you defending yourself against things I haven't said? Did you read your own ISO and realize you made a scumslip somewhere?Ellyssa wrote:I don't know that you'd be able to build a case as me and bf/Nacho as scum partners due to interactions, and I'm not going to try either as I know that's not true. Feel free to. I will point out though that according to your theory, if I and Nacho were scum, T-Bone-townie seemed the scummier one by the middle of D2, and he would have been a much easier mislynch come D3 and I had several days to swap my vote to Stels-townie to lynch him right away when he was at L-1, especially when I called out what I saw as a contradiction from him in my #353 and could have used that as a late-day excuse to lynch him right away. Since essentially no one else agreed with T-Bone on any of his arguments by the end, it doesn't make sense that I didn't. Point being I think my play has been clearly with the town's best interests at heart and speaks for itself otherwise. Even though I was ultimately on both mislynchwagons - so were you, split.
This is what I assume based on it:Quaroath wrote:Rain
Quaroath
Ellyssa
Split
T-Bone
Stels
Nacho
T-Bone flipped town as well as Quaroath and I know for a fact that I am town myself.Quaroath wrote:Rain
Quaroath
Ellyssa
Split
T-Bone
Stels
Nacho
- Split goes,splitfarvle in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2844727#p2844727]#104[/url] wrote:One thing that I find difficult in reading Rain is his role as IC. It doesn't help us to scumhunt if Rain is dropping knowledge that might be used by scum to appear more town. I don't think that part of my suspicion goes away if Jack flips town.
right after Rain goessplitfarvle in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2865485#p2865485]#214[/url] wrote:Didn't see that coming, hope it was a good decision
Which makes it seem like split knew Muh was town, and was trying to deaden the impact of Rain being the one to cast the hammer vote.Rain in [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2865270#p2865270]#213[/url] wrote:Still no defense. I don't see any bandwagon forming on anyone else in the near future. Also, I'm getting a bit bored in this game. Gotta make something happen.
Die scum.
Unvote
Vote: Muh316
on what he admits is a weak case, because he's saying that he won't move his vote unless Stels can be proven to be town, which no other townie can do (besides the cop.. was that foreshadowing and trying to test the waters to see if there was a cop, which he continued on with the WIFOM bomb at #293?, which is not a townie thing to do at that point of the day at all). Basically he's saying, "You can't prove Stels is not scum. Therefore Stels is scum."Rain wrote:Unless you have some ungodly explanation to why Stels is town, my vote stays.