First off, wow.
Second of all, I'll answer questions then get onto my thoughts.
Uncle Pain: Not all of it, no. Basically, it was my thoughts on Kcda being maf, hammering, and half of the two reasons I had for not hammering before. The next two paragraphs are excerpts that would be somewhat related.:
"I've also thought about my theory that the scum were setting Kcda up for a fall with NKing one of the players who had a vote on him during D1 and come up with an alternate view. Potentially, it could be a WIFOM argument, that he did it just to look so newb-scum that nobody could possibly think it was him. If accused of being scum and NKing his target, all it would take would be his buddy or even himself to point out that the Maf would want to get rid of an experienced player, somebody who was incredibly more active than our established IC in Nacho.
Another side to this potential argument, is the scum team being a mixture of Kcda and a new or rushing player, somebody who wouldn't quite think of the ramifications of killing Zachrulez. I won't put a name out at this stage, I think we should be more focused on one than a team at the moment."
One of the reasons I didn't want to hammer is for the usual reason, fear of looking scum if by some strange happening Kcda flipped town. The other reason I was going to leave out of my wall of text was that I wanted to see how Mist reacted to hammering. She says she'll do it blatantly within 24 hours, then 24 hours passes and no Kcda, an easy cop out. Then Kcda finally comes out of the woodwork, posts a barrage of reads that are so ridiculous it's not funny, to which Mist says he seems less scum and wants other people's opinions on that. As soon as GMan questions her on that, boom, 24 hours later, he's hammered.
Which brings me to my next question, from Mist: I think you are Kcda's partner, my dear. Re-reading you over the past couple of days, some things which appear innocent and joking seem to lead to a pretty good case. #5, RVS for Kcda, because he's always scum in your games. I'll let that slide, it's RVS and shenanigans occur. No, the real point here is something that was brought up by Escho earlier on. You claim you're always scummy. The point was raised by Escho, why say this? Are you trying to get everyone to think your play is typically scum, so even though you look scum you're just an innocent townie who can't help how she plays? Very odd.
For the rest of day 1, your banter between yourself and Kcda is off. You both post reads on each other that are all fluff, without questioning each others moves at all.
Day 2. Zach's NK, Mist is shocked. After calling for IC blood all Day 1, an extremely competent player comes into the game and you think a newbie player is going to be killed over one of the more experienced players? Come on. You wanted to get rid of the great players that were capable of figuring you out, it's completely understandable. Then Kcda calls you out for that, places a vote on you. Trying to distract us from who was killed that night, I'm assuming. The vote is so easily taken off you with barely an answer from you, no explanation from Kcda, just straight on to me. I call into question Zach's killing and his relationship with Kcda, and he votes me straight away. It's not even meant to be a serious vote, it's to draw the attention away again from any relationship between Kcda and Mist.
Immediately following Nacho's vote of Kcda, Mist throws up the same idea (re-reading, Inspira posts the same thing before either of us) that Kcda could be being used as a scapegoat. Inspira less so, maybe he was just planting the seed, but Mist literally uses it to defend Kcda from Nacho's vote. At this point, I have to concede that this sort of reasoning could also be used against me, I wrongly bought into his innocence. As Inspira elaborates more on the potential that Kcda could have done it in WIFOM-mode, Mist continues defending Kcda, "I have played with KCD before and I know he would never be that stupid to do that." in #376. Very defensive. Post #421 has her defending Kcda and trying to throw Nacho into the spotlight again. Struggling to save your buddy there, Mist?
Which brings me back to my second reason for not hammering, watching Mist hover over the hammer of Kcda. It looks fairly innocent, wanting to hold off, waiting for Kcda to defend himself... Then as soon as you're questioned, down comes Maxwell's silver hammer.
Who is night killed Night 2? GMan. The very same person who questioned your motives. Really, Mist? You're playing that same card again? Then in subsequent Day 3 posts, you bring the attention to Inspira's GMan vote and then eventual kill. You claim that Kcda couldn't possibly be that stupid to pull that card, but Inspira, who by your own words say is a great player, is stupid enough to do that? That is so incredibly inconsistent, it's shocking.
tl;dr - Mist had shady public dealings with Kcda and is using the "I'm killing the obvious targets against me so I couldn't be Maf" card.
VOTE: Mist7676
P.S. Apologies for massive wall of text. I like to ramble.
.
