Mini 1138 - Candy Zoo Mafia (Game Over!)

[vezokpiraka]

Toast

He isn't scum because he had a scum read on Stels. He is scum because of his last vote. It doesn't even matter if Stels flips scum. Hoppster made a case and voted. Toast didn't barn it but instead waited to see the reaction of other players. Someone else comes and puts a vote on Stels and he immediately votes Stels. He is either bussing for town points, or just voting him and appear townie.

[Zyrconium]

onvote, vote Stels

The wagon speed got me a little antsy, but Stels last post makes it obviouw, he's devolving, heading to explode, an easy target at the same time as being kinda dangerous for a scumbuddy to keep...

VP's vote come in #1 for opportunism, with Hopp and cp's coming slightly second. How scummy these are is of course related to his alignment, which I think will be a wonderful brownie shaped treat full of info, in and of itself.

[ToastyToast]

Toast

He isn't scum because he had a scum read on Stels. He is scum because of his last vote. It doesn't even matter if Stels flips scum. Hoppster made a case and voted. Toast didn't barn it but instead waited to see the reaction of other players. Someone else comes and puts a vote on Stels and he immediately votes Stels. He is either bussing for town points, or just voting him and appear townie.

Except there is one key problem with that. You see, I have this thing called life that I have to pay attention to. Your logic pretty much says that I have been sitting at my computer waiting for other people to comment. Only I can know if such a thing is true, but I assure you that I spent time catching up to all my games and then came back later.

In other news, happy birthday!!

[mb53]

Quickly caught up.

Stels case is convincing. Willing to hammer.

Still think NS is scum (even if it fits meta ).

[Amrun]

That's your long-promised catch up post? THAT'S IT?

[mb53]

"Quickly"

But basically yeah. Not

that

much has happened since I left...

[Charlie]

Vote Count 20

Stels (6) - Hoppster, crazypianist1116, Amrun, ToastyToast, vezokpiraka, Zyrconium
Nobody Special (2) - mb53, Kalofer
Hazard With a Glove (2) - Morthas, Nobody Special
Morthas (1) - Hazard With a Glove
crazypianist1116 (1) - Stels

Not voting: No one.
With 12 alive it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline is on Wednesday, 20th April at 1200 hours (GMT -5)

[Amrun]

I'm bored.

Anyone else opposed to a hammer from mb or otherwise?

I'm feeling good about the Stels lynch with the abysmal defence and the push for an easy lynch on lurky cp.

[Hoppster]

Meh.

Site meta dictates waiting for a claim. -.-

[Morthas]

Opposed to hammer for now~~

[Amrun]

For waiting on a claim?

Yes, I'm open to a claim.

In general, what I meant was, after a claim, as long as we all still agree he's a scumbag, do we have to fart around for another week, or can we just hammer please?

[Amrun]

And the reason I say that is because if his claim is convincing enough / he comes up with a stellar defense, we still have time to build a new wagon, IF Stels claims soon, which I am trying to promote.

[vezokpiraka]

If he was town he would've claimed long ago. He is just stalling now.

[Amrun]

If he was town he would've claimed long ago. He is just stalling now.

Yes, basically this. How long are we going to wait around for a claim that doesn't seem to be coming?

Exactly.

[Hoppster]

Jumping the gun a bit guys...

I'm all for a Stels lynch, but it's not unreasonable to give him at least 24 hours to claim.

[Amrun]

I didn't mean yet. It was actually a question, like HOW LONG do we want to wait? I say no mare than 48 hours since the vote count that confirmed him at L-1.

[Hoppster]

How long are we going to wait around for a claim that doesn't seem to be coming?

So how can you make a judgement on whether it's coming yet or not?

The deadline of 48 hours is something I'm cool with.

[Hoppster]

EBWOP: Actually, no. We need to hear from Hazard and Nobody Special. >>

[Amrun]

Okay, then, assuming Hazard and NS post -- I see the merit of this -- then 48 hours, yes?

I hope to see a claim in that time frame, but I feel more confident about the Stels lynch now and it is my personal opinion that if he has not yet claimed, he probably won't. I hope he does. We'll see.

Mostly I just feel like the game is stalling and a flip will revitalize it and we can come back next game day with fresh faces and (hopefully) a scum flip to analyze.

[Nobody Special]

Totally convinced on Stels. Willing to hammer, waiting for claim.

Also, Toast is, well, toast. (Read: scum, with Stels.)

Not so much liking mb, but it's almost OMGUS territory for me, not much else.

[Hoppster]

Also, Toast is, well, toast. (Read: scum, with Stels.)

ICWHUTUDIDTHAR.

Wordplay is fun.


But seriously:

@ Nobody Special: No opinions on the Hazard reveal?

Less applicable now your vote is no longer on him, but eh. You still up for LAL?

[Nobody Special]

Sure. But let's do Stels first.

[Amrun]

So you'll lynch anybody ... For any reason at all?

[Nobody Special]

I didn't say that.

[Amrun]

You heavily implied it. You were asked several times what you thought of the Hazard claim and instead of answering, you say you'd lynch him for LAL when his lie was small and understandable and his claim is pertinent.