Mini 1138 - Candy Zoo Mafia (Game Over!)

[mb53]

Should I reveal my goodies info?

Yes

[Stels]

Meh, I had no goodies. That also means I don't have any at the moment as well.

[mb53]

You already said that, I was just telling you to say it again for testing lying

[Stels]

Oh, woops. I didn't notice that I've already mentioned that.

[Stels]

@Kalofer: fuck you. That's all I want to say before some idiot ends my life.

[Stels]

EBWOP: inside joke, no harm meant.

[Amrun]

So what do, town?

[Morthas]

Hey Hoppster, what are you reasons for concealing your 2nd ability?

[Morthas]

I would prefer numerous other players to lynch over Stels

[Hoppster]

Am I honestly the only person conflicted about the lack of goodies from Stels?

>>

It's not following the Sample Vanilla Role PM in the second post, and, eh...


Stels - despite having no goodies, are you still described as being a Candy Animal?

NO HAMMER UNTIL I'VE SEEN THIS OUT PLZKTHX.

[Hoppster]

EBWODP: Oops, forgot to answer Morthas.

It's to create WIFOM for the scum.

There are two options:

1) It's a powerful ability.
2) It's a weak ability


Scum have to WIFOM over whether I'm going to use it or not, whether it's worth trying to kill me to prevent me from using it, but then I might not have been intending to use it in the first place and they're just wasting their NK, or maybe it's weak so it doesn't matter if I use it or not, but then is it worth risking that it's weak when it could be powerful, but if I have a powerful ability aren't I going to just hide each night to protect it, etc.


I also have the outline of a plan occurring.


Kalofer - don't lynch me in lylo, that's just stupid. I'd rather not be lynched before lylo either, however, and I have a plan that may remove any doubts about my hiding ability, which is optional (that is to say I don't need to use it). A lot of suspicion seems to be revolving around the fact that I could be scum hiding behind the claim, from what I can tell, so all you have to do is target me every single night. You're bound to target me at some point on a night where I don't hide, and thus you'll get a different response to "Action failed", and thus it can be confirmed that I do indeed have this ability which I can use at will.

There's also something I want to discuss with you. I suspect we'll get a QT if you target me and I don't hide.

[Amrun]

Wow, good point.

VT not having candy lololol.

Lynch it with fire.

[Hoppster]

I'm thinking it might actually be best to spare Stels today, and have ALL Zoo Visitors target him tonight.

The benefits of this are two-fold:

1. If he's scum, we find out what happens when a Zoo Visitor visits scum (that aren't also Zoo Visitors), so they effectively become cops to an extent
   
2. If he's town... I dunno. I get the feeling something interesting will happen. They won't get a QT, as he's not a Zoo Visitor, and he doesn't have any goodies to steal, yet he's a monkey who plays music?!

[Amrun]

His name implies he's a candy animal.

Yet he has no candy.

I say lynch it with fire.

[Hoppster]

Exactly, I agree that Stels is in all likelihood scum.

So, if the Zoo Visitors target Stels, then we learn what happens when scum (who aren't Zoo Visitors) are investigated by Zoo Visitors.

Then, if a Zoo Visitor targets somebody and gets back the same results from targeting Stels, they have found more scum!


The reason it needs all Zoo Visitors to do this is because potentially, not all zoo visitors are town. Some may be scumbuddies with Stels, so it needs verification from all zoo visitors.


We can lynch Stels tomorrow, but I think it'd help to get this information.

[Amrun]

Okay.

Alternative lynch, then?

I need to do re-read for Stels buddies, but I've no time atm.

[Hoppster]

>>

Only issues is with 5 days I don't know if we have time to build up another wagon, wait for claim, and hammer.

With recent wagons, it'd have to be NS or Hazard, as I think it'd take too long building a wagon from scratch.

[Morthas]

Hazard ;D

[Kalofer]

I'd be more than happy to investigate stels if NS is lynched. You better make up your mind by 5 hours though.

[Amrun]

I really don't care. Either NS or Hazard lynch sounds fine to me, personally.

NS maybe because we don't have his claim. Advantage of Hazard: no need to wait for his claim.

[Morthas]

Hey Hazard~~~~ mind answering my question ;D?

[Hoppster]

Mehhhh...

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Hazard with a Glove

Hazard wagon GOGOGO.


I just got really, really bad vibes from his distancing of the Stels wagon. It was just 'STELS WAGON IS BAD' without acknowledging my case at all. He then makes a generalisation of "there's scum on his wagon" without mentioning any names at all, as to create the effect that he's actually doing something rather than making a sweeping comment applicable to several people.


I'll switch back to Stels if this fails.

[Amrun]

I agree, but if we're going to test stels, what's the point of killing both claimed zoo visitors?

We could agree to have Hazard claim results first, then Kalofer can either agree or confirm scum.

[Amrun]

Wait, if they kill or) Kalofer that lan is shit. :/ Nvm.

VOTE: hazard

[vezokpiraka]

Let me get this straight.

We aren't lynching the scum today because we want to let him to live another and let kalofer test him and today we want to kill our other claimed PR?

Are you mad guys? When did this sound good?

Amrun I can't believe you're saying something that stupid in the last two posts.