UncertainKitten wrote:I was unaware that was a game, well, outside the large theme, but this reads like the thread itself.Also, hardly anybody joins the site toplayMish-Mash, Large Themes, andGuys Part 2, in that order.
. DonJosh wrote:SleepyKrew wrote:Nominate StrangerCoug for Best MishMash User.
Why wasn't this done before?
He basically mods half the games in there, and then plays in a ton that he doesn't run.
Second
In post 1163, Beck wrote:In post 1162, Ythan wrote:The player who receives the title was not a loser. His team was. He, individually, did well.
agree with this
In post 1288, xRECKONERx wrote:Nominate MoS for Best Replacement in Prozac's Basic Theme 3for the reasons SC stated.
In post 1291, Parama wrote:Nominate Mastermind of Sin for Best Replacement for Prozac's Basic Theme 3.
[...] amazed that nobody had nominated yet, so I figured I'd do the honors.
In post 1206, Tragedy wrote:Nominate izakthegoomba for Best Mish Mash Mod for making Planet Mafiascum & Conspiracy.
His modding in Planet Mafiascum makes the gameveryenjoyable, especially with the great mechanics and stuff.
His idea for Modding Conspiracy was nice as well.
He's a nice Mish Mash player as well, and he's awesome.
In post 1330, Scummies wrote:In post 1325, zoraster wrote:Third but only if we insist on having this as a category, which I don't really like.
Yeah, pretty sure this is a joke category. No idea why it's on page 1. I'll add it later if it becomes a category.
(Updated, keeping on top of things before the inevitable 'december rush' where people realise there was lots of stuff they wanted to nominate through the year but were lazy/forgot)
In post 1340, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 1339, izakthegoomba wrote:I believe you "nth" it after third. I have no idea why.
Nothing actually needs to be 2nded or thirded, much less anything even more redundant after that. "nth" is just to cut off any further pointless nominations of the same person for the same awards.
In post 1345, Mr. Flay wrote:I thought seconding was a requirement, and anything after that was superfluous. I don't like the idea of any random single nomination cluttering up the judges' workload.
In post 1347, izakthegoomba wrote:Yeah, seconds should be required, but I think people should be allowed to go as far as they want to show support for a nominee.
In post 1349, izakthegoomba wrote:In post 1348, animorpherv1 wrote:In post 1347, izakthegoomba wrote:Yeah, seconds should be required, but I think people should be allowed to go as far as they want to show support for a nominee.
Well TECHNICALLY they can, it's just not recorded. What would happen if someone got tenthed? And yes, this happens.
Umm... the judges take into account that users clearly think this person should get a scummie?
In post 1352, izakthegoomba wrote:Is Scummies an alt of mith, or someone else entirely?
In post 1364, Scummies wrote:
Invalid file.
Thread is updated.
Some tags were fixed.
In post 1366, Faraday wrote:Do you not understand the meaning of the word 'some', Ani?
In post 1377, zoraster wrote:No, it's unlikely the judges will. They'll probably read enough to try and get a sense of the game and what it takes, but I highly doubt anyone will read it all. If you want to make it easy on the judges, include a list of things you'd like them to look at specifically.
In post 1379, Tragedy wrote:It's based on...
- How you run the game
- Game Mechanics
- How well you ran the game
Something like those, right?