Open 290 - Double Day (Game Over)

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #800 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:52 am

My reactions to the two votes.

And it was refuted with the fact that Furc is trying to policy lynch me. Thus, scum would be HAPPY to jump on my wagon under the guise of "following the policy lynch".

silverbullet999 · Post Post #801 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:53 am

Thus, scum would be HAPPY to jump on my wagon under the guise of "following the policy lynch".

So in that case... when did I state this?

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #802 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:59 am

You don't need to state it.

All you need is to jump on, and ride the proverbial wave.

silverbullet999 · Post Post #803 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:01 am

wow...

so...

anyone who currently votes you.. or is already voting you... is scum... by that logic... yes?

silverbullet999 · Post Post #804 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:02 am

(Except perhaps for the one calling said wave)

Hiraki · Post Post #805 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:03 am

silverbullet999 wrote:wow...

so...

anyone who currently votes you.. or is already voting you... is scum... by that logic... yes?

Instead of trying to twist LLD's logic, you should try to actually defend. Now seems like a good time.

silverbullet999 · Post Post #806 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:08 am

-Hiraki

Expand please... how am I doing what you are claiming..

she literally just said anyone who joins the wave in voting her is scum...
where before she literally said I must be scum because i joined the wagon under the guise that I was following the policy lynch...

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #807 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:12 am

You're misrepping me.

I said that anyone who joins the wagon JUST to ride the wave is likely scum.

You'll notice that my first reaction was to

ASK FOR A REASON

.

This is because had you given something semi-valid, it wouldn't have been opportunistic.

But instead, you dodged twice and gave me that horrible "reaction testing" reason.

THAT is why you are scum. Not everyone who would jump on my wagon is scum. Only those who do it with no logical basis.

And your misrep is noted. Further evidence of you being scum.

Hiraki · Post Post #808 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:22 am

Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You're misrepping me.

I said that anyone who joins the wagon JUST to ride the wave is likely scum.

You'll notice that my first reaction was to
ASK FOR A REASON
.

This is because had you given something semi-valid, it wouldn't have been opportunistic.

But instead, you dodged twice and gave me that horrible "reaction testing" reason.

THAT is why you are scum. Not everyone who would jump on my wagon is scum. Only those who do it with no logical basis.

And your misrep is noted. Further evidence of you being scum.

Exactly.

Unvote, Vote: Silver

silverbullet999 · Post Post #809 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:24 am

You'll notice that my first reaction was to ASK FOR A REASON.

WRONG
your first reaction was simply stating "No Reason?" and then further state "to give me rope as well as furc and number58" (who in all your posts before you had literally stated Nothing about him.)

I notice this and further pursue said reason and you give me a reason which i give my thoughts on, shortly after you don't respond to that thus I reveal it being a reaction test... how quick you are to immediately call someone scum (though hilariously you take it back for now on furc) disturbs me.

You then state that me revealing that I wanted your reaction was bullshit and i'm scum... which I question because why the fuck would I want to reveal that I'm looking for your reaction when I was still seeking it.. then you say it was refuted and I ask you to expand.. then you say it's refuted because scum would be happy to hop on a policy lynch under the guise of "following the policy lynch", I ask for where I state this and you then say Oh nope, all you need to do is hop on and ride the proverbial wave. Thus the main reason why i'm scum is because I voted you cause you are paranoid as hell about your wagon...

...

don't see how this is hard to see but ah well..

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #810 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:28 am

"No Reason?" Implies that I want you to give one.

Notice that I didn't move my vote onto you until you

finally

gave your shitty reason.

silverbullet999 · Post Post #811 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:44 am

Notice that I didn't move my vote onto you until you finally gave your shitty reason.

Actually you moved your vote when you magically though furc was an idiot.

"No Reason?" Implies that I want you to give one.

That alone? yes..
Saying afterwards that I should die before I respond... more or less implies you don't give a shit.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #812 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:48 am

I really am done arguing with you.

You are backpedaling now.

I have shown why you are scum.

silverbullet999 · Post Post #813 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:50 am

Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I really am done arguing with you.

You are backpedaling now.

I have shown why you are scum.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #814 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:51 am

You disagree with me because you are scum, and I am pushing for your lynch.

Obviously you would disagree.

Doesn't matter. Town will see you for the scum you are~.

Hiraki · Post Post #815 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:53 am

Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You disagree with me because you are scum, and I am pushing for your lynch.

Obviously you would disagree.

Doesn't matter. Town will see you for the scum you are~.

LLD. WHY AREN'T THESE SUBS OUT YET?

I ALMOST SPOILED MYSELF WITH ALL THIS TENSION.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #816 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:55 am

YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO WAIT.

AND THIS IS THE WRONG THREAD FOR THAT TOPIC. STAY ON GAME RELATED STUFFS IN HERE.

MADOKA IS FOR MADOKA THREAD.

Hiraki · Post Post #817 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:57 am

Lady Lambdadelta wrote:YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO WAIT.

AND THIS IS THE WRONG THREAD FOR THAT TOPIC. STAY ON GAME RELATED STUFFS IN HERE.

MADOKA IS FOR MADOKA THREAD.

BUT I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE.

LIKE IT'S BEEN 3 WEEKS, AND I'M AT THE SECONDS WAITING FOR THESE GOD-DAMN SUBS.

I MEAN, SILVER IS ALREADY CONFIRMED, CAN'T WE LEAVE IT AT THAT?

silverbullet999 · Post Post #818 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:58 am

I'm goin off for awhile, gonna say this though.. @ all if you think i'm scum, vote me, if i'm lynched, i'm lynched. If I flip town (which I will) you

need

to lynch LLD cause 1. If she's somehow town... she's literally terribad and will drive this town to shit. 2. she's more than likely scum.

Hiraki · Post Post #819 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 11:59 am

silverbullet999 wrote:I'm goin off for awhile, gonna say this though.. @ all if you think i'm scum, vote me, if i'm lynched, i'm lynched. If I flip town (which I will) you
need
to lynch LLD cause 1. If she's somehow town... she's literally terribad and will drive this town to shit. 2. she's more than likely scum.

Even if you are town, you realize that we won't lynch LLD, based off this reasoning right?

You're scummy. LLD found you at fault, convinced us.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #820 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:02 pm

silverbullet999 wrote:I'm goin off for awhile, gonna say this though.. @ all if you think i'm scum, vote me, if i'm lynched, i'm lynched. If I flip town (which I will) you
need
to lynch LLD cause 1. If she's somehow town... she's literally terribad and will drive this town to shit. 2. she's more than likely scum.

Appeal to Authority.

Check.

singersigner · Post Post #821 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:05 pm

lol. Wow...

You guys really suck at this.

Ok, so Furc comes in and does one of the more protown things, which is jump start the fucking game again (I figured the replacements would do that, as previously mentioned, but I guess he wasn't willing to wait), and then gets hit with this huge fucking OMGUS attack.

He calls LLD out for probably being a town leader and "wanting to lynch her" (I'm not actually sure if it was a real push for a PL or not), and then what happens...she comes in, flags waving, taking the reigns like, "look at me, I'm the shit, you best be listenin booooooiz." You say that it's pro-scum for town not to have a leader, but it's even more pro-scum for a replacement to become that leader. I've seen all to often where someone replaces out of a spot, scummy or not, and the replacement comes in a wipes the board by "leading to town" and

looking

like the most pro-town player here.

Right now, all I see is an OMGUS attack on Furc, and an ornery player who clearly isn't paying attention to the game.

Silver's not backpedaling and I encourage you to point out where he is.

Hiraki's flown up my scumdar. Since when is anyone who hasn't flipped yet

confirmed

scum?

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #822 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:12 pm

singersigner wrote:lol. Wow...

You guys really suck at this.

Ok, so Furc comes in and does one of the more protown things, which is jump start the fucking game again (I figured the replacements would do that, as previously mentioned, but I guess he wasn't willing to wait), and then gets hit with this huge fucking OMGUS attack.

He calls LLD out for probably being a town leader and "wanting to lynch her" (I'm not actually sure if it was a real push for a PL or not), and then what happens...she comes in, flags waving, taking the reigns like, "look at me, I'm the shit, you best be listenin booooooiz." You say that it's pro-scum for town not to have a leader, but it's even more pro-scum for a replacement to become that leader. I've seen all to often where someone replaces out of a spot, scummy or not, and the replacement comes in a wipes the board by "leading to town" and
looking
like the most pro-town player here.

Right now, all I see is an OMGUS attack on Furc, and an ornery player who clearly isn't paying attention to the game.

Silver's not backpedaling and I encourage you to point out where he is.

Hiraki's flown up my scumdar. Since when is anyone who hasn't flipped yet
confirmed
scum?

Actually, I think you're the one who sucks at this.

I've read some of your games. Not that great.

Anyway, now that we are past the Ad Hom you were throwing down, let me begin.

First, with Furc.

Tell me, do you like being told you're a policy lynch?

What if I offered to Policy Lynch you?

Further, his reasons for a PL are unfounded, stupid, and anti-town.

Then, in comes SB either Chainsawing Furc, or trying to hop onto his PL wagon.

He does it without a given reason.

I ask for a reason behind his vote 3 times.

Not given till the third time.

When it IS given, it's "reaction fishing".

I don't know if you know this... but that's just about the easiest claim to make if you are scum.

"Why did you do this scummy thing?"

"OH! I WAS JUST REACTION FISHING. HERP A DERP~"

Further, his reactions to my posts are just attempt at slandering my logic.

When I point out his scummy moves and flaws, he attempts to backpedal by retroactively modifying his case.

THAT is why he is scum.

Furc is still "meh" right now. I want to see him respond to my questions about his vote before I decide.

Lady Lambdadelta · Post Post #823 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:14 pm

Also, LOL @ YOU CALLING WHAT FURC DID PRO-TOWN.

HOW IS A PL 31 PAGES INTO THE GAME "PRO-TOWN"?

singersigner · Post Post #824 (ISO) » Thu Apr 21, 2011 1:21 pm

Well, by your reaction to it, you've now become one of the scummiest players here.
"Wah, why aren't you guys smart enough to realize he's stooooopid."

So yeah, I'm ok with it.

Also, lol @ you saying Silver practically

claimed

scum, and set still no vote on him? What happened to wanting to lynch scum?

Please.

vote: Lady Lambdadelta