lane0168 wrote:RangeroftheNorth wrote:I think Emp's actions make it clear he was setting a trap to catch scum eager to jump on an easy wagon. I think he succeeded.
right... which is why you just jumped on my wagon. thank you for proving your own point.
The bandwagon on you had legitimate reasons, and I added the reasons why I chose to join it. The bandwagon on me was based on one ludicrous accusation, and you added nothing when you joined it. These circumstances are hardly the same.
lane0168 wrote:I was saying that if stef would have not been so sweet to you and bussed you ranger, than you would not be in this predicament. stef's "buddying" doesn't look like buddying. it does look like she is pointing out the stupid logic of mozamis. nobody would notice in context of the current situation that was going on when it was said. turns out stef flipped scum, which makes her miniscule buddying of you much more relevant.
So many things wrong with this.
1)Scum are just as likely to buddy with scum as with town.
2)Pointing out why someone's logic is flawed isn't buddying
lane0168 wrote:Ranger- "Couple it with the fact that lane hasn't done any independent scum hunting, and his quick jump onto a particularly poor bandwagon, and that's where I'm putting my vote."
would you care to show me the people that have done "independent scum hunting"? pretty sure it's no one if we're being honest. yeah people said a couple things on day one, but if you remember, we were following the cop. day's 2 and 3 were pretty quick. again thank you for proving your point. this time about the "particularly poor bandwagon".
Let's see, people who have done independent scum hunting:
Icerint: His targetting of you was certainly independent scum hunting. I think that he was largely focusing on information that wasn't necessarily meaningful, but he was certainly attempting to find scum.
Bella: Her read on me wasn't valid, but it was certainly attempting to find scum, something you hadn't done at all on your own.
Nachomamma: Who originally built the case against TheKingpin
MrTrow: Originally stated the case against mozamis
And that's just the very first person on each of these wagons. Other people have put some detailed analysis into this game. You have simply restated things that other people already said. Obviously, most of these cases were misguided, and the fact that these people were attempting to scum hunt doesn't mean they aren't scum (except Ice and Nacho, obviously) but they were at least trying to find scum. Its more than possible given the content we have so far.
lane0168 wrote:also, i'm looking at your iso? and i don't see any independent scum hunting of worth. but good point. and where was i quickly jumping from? naturally its a poor bandwagon, thats exactly what you would say if it was a particularly fantastic bandwagon.
You can see what you want. I built my case against mozamis, and I questioned TheKingpin. Clearly both of these wagons were misplaced, but I used the evidence I had, and the reactions to the wagons is revealing. Like your reaction to my arguments against mozamis.
lane0168 wrote:@Trow, i believe stef to be ranger's partner. at the moment, emp's looking like a good candidate as well but may be a little too obvious which makes me consider him not being scum. thank you for the options and all, but you are def my second choice for ranger's partner, due to the fact you gave me the option of picking bella who i obviously am voting with and have shown no signs of incrimination... emp, which is the obvious choice... and myself. i also have to ask how that particular case on ranger was nullified so quickly? is it just a coincidence that you like the word particular and so does ranger? and that ranger mentioned i got sucked into the trap right after you mentioned it was a trap?
Seriously? Your argument is that because we both used the same word, we must be scum together? I don't even have words to describe how ridiculous that sounds to me. In what way could that possibly be evidence?
lane0168 wrote:or are you ranger's alternate? or is ranger your alternate?
What do you mean here by alternate? I don't understand that.
