Mini 1161 - Neruzian Era Mafia (Over!)

hiplop · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:07 pm

V/LA possibly (90% chance) until Sunday

Quilford · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:30 pm

Faraday wrote:Why would you be annoyed? Answer the question though.

Yes, I am nervous scum.

You're ultra-confident that I'll flip scum, and yet you haven't backed up your read on me. Do so, please.

Vi wrote:Quilford - When are you going to say something that isn't defensive?

Why would you not just state that you think I'm being defensive?

Why did you sheep my vote on Scott?

charter wrote:He's trying to shift the attention off himself, but not doing a very townish job of it.

Hmm? How did I try to do that in my post, in your opinion?

Quilford · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:32 pm

hiplop wrote:is quilford at l-1? i don't want to hammer but im sort of suspecting him now

This is scum making preparatory excuses for their hammer.

UNVOTE: Scott Brosius
VOTE: hiplop

Vi · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Thu Apr 28, 2011 9:59 pm

Sloth 123 wrote:Vi, why pick Hiplop over the others? Same question.

Elephant in room: The reasons for voting Qwilfish don't exist, at least not from anyone voting him

sans

charter.
If hiplop can tell me how and when he started finding Quilford suspicious enough to jump on a wagon he thought was high enough to be around L-1, I will buy a hat so I can eat it.

*sets timer*

charter 122 wrote:Oh, Vi's vote on Scott was terribad as well.

charter 124 wrote:Wow, Vi's hiplop vote was bad too, this is a disturbing pattern.

Would you like to discuss the merits of those votes? I'm sure I'll come out on top.

Quilford 126 wrote:Yes, I am nervous scum.

...

Quilford 126 wrote:1) Why would you not just state that you think I'm being defensive?

2) Why did you sheep my vote on Scott?

1) That would require me to speak in a straightforward and non-circuitous manner. :vi:

2) That depends on your definition of sheeping.
I voted Scott for the same reasons as you, but would have done so regardless of whether you had voted him or not.
"Sheeping" is blindly following someone's vote because they say so, like my vote on you was sheeping Faraday.

V/LA for weekend

Quilford · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:05 pm

Vi wrote:
Quilford 126 wrote:Yes, I am nervous scum.
...

Why would you feel the need to quote this?

Vi · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:15 pm

Quilford 129 wrote:
Vi wrote:
Quilford 126 wrote:Yes, I am nervous scum.
...
Why would you feel the need to quote this?

It bothers me - I know I've been tempted to pull the sarcastic "yes, you're right, I'm scum" line when it was actually true.

Quilford · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Thu Apr 28, 2011 10:26 pm

Vi wrote:
Quilford 129 wrote:
Vi wrote:
Quilford 126 wrote:Yes, I am nervous scum.
...
Why would you feel the need to quote this?
It bothers me - I know I've been tempted to pull the sarcastic "yes, you're right, I'm scum" line when it was actually true.

Why did you not say this in your last post?

Twistedspoon · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:15 am

Quilford wrote:
hiplop wrote:is quilford at l-1? i don't want to hammer but im sort of suspecting him now

This is scum making preparatory excuses for their hammer.

actually, it wasn't the hammer since charter soon voted to put you at L-1

Quilford wrote:
Faraday wrote:Why would you be annoyed? Answer the question though.

Yes, I am nervous scum.

seems a trick question here

hiplop wrote:
So far my town reads are faraday and twistedspoon

care to explain

please understand that I hold anyone with a town read on me in the highest respect
VOTE: hoplip

Vi wrote:
I'm not following your Sloth and T-spoon reads.

who are your reads then, Vi?

Faraday wrote:
As for why I declared nueky town, well now I can talk about it. Hiplop basically sheeped my reads last game we played, he was scum there, I was wondering if he'd agree with my neuky town read here. Otoh, I've no idea how much attention he's paying

I pointed that out :0

Also, you forgot to point out you were town in that game
and that Hiplop was only stopped because of my heriocs, as I intend to to this time as well should he be mafioso (which I believe he may be for the reasons above)

Vi wrote:like my vote on you was sheeping Faraday.

Vi wrote:sheeping Faraday.

Vi wrote:Faraday.

Hmm...
Well surely that's two players who've sheeped faraday now
Conclusions, faraday?

@Quilford: Hiplop aside I have yet to hear much of you in other reads. Do you still Suspect Scott? Any other noteworthy opinions on players?
@Scott, Pappums and Hiplop: What are the 3 scummiest things you've seen so far?

Sloth · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:15 am

Quilford wrote:
hiplop wrote:is quilford at l-1? i don't want to hammer but im sort of suspecting him now

This is scum making preparatory excuses for their hammer.

UNVOTE: Scott Brosius
VOTE: hiplop

This seems like scum trying to get a wagon off him, especially with having such a respected player's vote already on his side.

Quilford · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:29 am

Sloth wrote:
Quilford wrote:
hiplop wrote:is quilford at l-1? i don't want to hammer but im sort of suspecting him now

This is scum making preparatory excuses for their hammer.

UNVOTE: Scott Brosius
VOTE: hiplop

This seems like scum trying to get a wagon off him, especially with having such a respected player's vote already on his side.

I'm sorry, whether someone's respected or not

does not make an ounce of a difference

in this game.

UNVOTE: hiplop
VOTE: Sloth

Quilford · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:33 am

Twistedspoon wrote:@Quilford: Hiplop aside I have yet to hear much of you in other reads. Do you still Suspect Scott? Any other noteworthy opinions on players?

Faraday seems scummy; she's not bothering with posting cases.
Sloth does too; for reasons I outlined in my previous post.
I still don't like Scott only popping in to say 'I still like my vote'; there's a helluva lot of material he could've addressed but chose not to.

Faraday · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:56 am

Quilford wrote:
Faraday wrote:Why would you be annoyed? Answer the question though.

Yes, I am nervous scum.

You're ultra-confident that I'll flip scum, and yet you haven't backed up your read on me. Do so, please.

Maybe later, I'm pretty good for the moment.

Also ooh I'm feminine now.

ITT: Faraday is now a woman.

Faraday · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:00 am

Well surely that's two players who've sheeped faraday now
Conclusions, faraday?

I'm a baller? What do you conclude? Do you think it's alignment relevant?

Quilford · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:21 am

Why are you being deliberately obtuse, Faraday?

hiplop · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:57 am

Twistedspoon wrote:
Quilford wrote:
hiplop wrote:is quilford at l-1? i don't want to hammer but im sort of suspecting him now

This is scum making preparatory excuses for their hammer.

actually, it wasn't the hammer since charter soon voted to put you at L-1

Quilford wrote:
Faraday wrote:Why would you be annoyed? Answer the question though.

Yes, I am nervous scum.

seems a trick question here
hiplop wrote:
So far my town reads are faraday and twistedspoon

care to explain

please understand that I hold anyone with a town read on me in the highest respect
VOTE: hoplip

Vi wrote:
I'm not following your Sloth and T-spoon reads.

who are your reads then, Vi?

Faraday wrote:
As for why I declared nueky town, well now I can talk about it. Hiplop basically sheeped my reads last game we played, he was scum there, I was wondering if he'd agree with my neuky town read here. Otoh, I've no idea how much attention he's paying

I pointed that out :0

Also, you forgot to point out you were town in that game
and that Hiplop was only stopped because of my heriocs, as I intend to to this time as well should he be mafioso (which I believe he may be for the reasons above)

Vi wrote:like my vote on you was sheeping Faraday.

Vi wrote:sheeping Faraday.

Vi wrote:Faraday.

Hmm...
Well surely that's two players who've sheeped faraday now
Conclusions, faraday?

@Quilford: Hiplop aside I have yet to hear much of you in other reads. Do you still Suspect Scott? Any other noteworthy opinions on players?
@Scott, Pappums and Hiplop: What are the 3 scummiest things you've seen so far?

Well, faraday has been playing the same as he usually does when town, hes just been acting townie the entire time

TS you've been productive and haven't really done anything scummy.

I don't see what was scummy about me asking if he was at l-1? i know he was close and i didnt want to hammer without a claim

As for quilford being scummy, i found #93 #126 seem rather fake/forced.

Quilford · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:10 am

hiplop wrote:As for quilford being scummy, i found #93 #126 seem rather fake/forced.

How are they fake / forced?

Quilford · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:15 am

Okay. So. I was bandwagoned for very little reason, Faraday is advocating my lynch for no reason at all, and almost everyone who is voting me has given reasoning as to why after they have been called out for it. And then they're not backing up their reasoning.

Faraday · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:19 am

Not

no reason

. A girl's got to have her secrets. Teehee.

Faraday · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:21 am

Hiplop, what does Faradayscum look like? And don't quote the whole post, plz, it's unneeded unless you're being trolly.

I'd be surprised if charter was scum.

Twistedspoon · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:21 am

Faraday wrote:A girl's got to have her secrets. Teehee.

this made me lol

but I still have some empathy with Quilford

Faraday · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:23 am

Also #126 came after you expressed suspicion of him, so was it just the initial post you found scummy? or wat? Also thoughts on Neuky and Vi?

Juls · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:57 am

My town has been devastated by tornadoes. My family and home are ok but we will be without power for up to a week or more .

please replace me

. If you are unable to get a replacement once I get back up and running, I will rejoin. I apologize if this posts more than once as Internet is spotty even on my cell.

Quilford · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:58 am

Oh, Juls D: That's really unfortunate. Hope everyone is okay.

<3

Empking · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:04 am

I'd be surprised if charter was scum.

Why?

Charter: Who is more suspicious: Vi or Looker?

pappums rat · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:19 am

V/LA until Sunday