Mini 1161 - Neruzian Era Mafia (Over!)

[Vi]

will get back to this when i get over the fact quilford isn't scum.

Don't take your time.

That is indeed one of the more disturbing V/LA posts I've seen.

At that point, Looker was much scummier.

I'd ask why, but the ensuing argument would be pointless so etc.

I can tell that you all won't have the balls to lynch someone who claims a power role today, so getting more people to claim is a bad idea.

I've certainly pushed for power role lynches

Vote: Empking

(L-4)

Sheeping pap-rat

pap-rat is definitely going the right way.

[Vi]

will get back to this when i get over the fact quilford isn't scum.

Don't take your time.

That is indeed one of the more disturbing V/LA posts I've seen.

On second thought, go back to not taking your time.

[Faraday]

vote empking

[Faraday]

(well over it)

[Faraday]

charter's play looks very town, tbh. the wanting to lynch a vanilla thing isn't scummy, it's something i'd expect out of him regardless of alignment. I actually

like

his position w/r/t the quilford wagon before the claim very much.

[Empking]

Vi: Why the vote?

[Faraday]

will get back to this when i get over the fact quilford isn't scum.

Don't take your time.

That is indeed one of the more disturbing V/LA posts I've seen.

On second thought, go back to not taking your time.

also no.

[Vi]

the wanting to lynch a vanilla thing isn't scummy, it's something i'd expect out of him regardless of alignment.

How so?

I actually like his position w/r/t the quilford wagon before the claim very much.

How so?

Also,

yes

. (as in

yes

I've lost track of what you're saying)

--

@Empking: See catch-up post from last night.

[Faraday]

i don't quite understand. 'how so' what? I think this is how charter would behave as town, and thus behave as scum. er? if you're asking why, dunno wild guess based on playstyle.

looks sincere

also, ok. as long as i understand.

[Empking]

So "Empking - only posts to push Quilford toward getting lynched."?

1. So you disagree with Andrew's claim that I'm being overdefensive?
2. What time period are you talking out? What are the posts that exemplify that?

[Vi]

No comment on Faraday's post.

---

...who's Andrew?

I don't disagree that you're posting to maintain the status quo on bad wagons and asking why people want to chop your fishy head off.
I'm also not going to formalize my accusation, because I don't have to.

[Empking]

No comment on Faraday's post.

---

...who's Andrew?

Sorry. I meant Pappum.

I don't disagree that you're posting to maintain the status quo on bad wagons and asking why people want to chop your fishy head off.

1. Would you agree that saying one thing while thinking another is a scum tell? Would you agree that its teasonable for me to think that Quilford was doing that (calling me scum while not voting me (this was before the hiplop vote, I think) or voting Sloth(?) based on a theory disagreement (whether people would sheep you)?
2. Is trying to understand the perspective from people of those of unknown alignment a scum tell?

[Faraday]

hey empy, what do you think of twistedspoon?

[Vi]

@Empking -
Not necessarily
Not really; multiple people can look scummy at once
Parentheses don't match; I can't tell if there's a second part to this

When it's you asking people to provide a precise case against you, quite possibly.

[Empking]

His suspicion of Scott seems genuine so I'd say a pretty strong town read.

[Empking]

@Empking -
Not necessarily

Presuming no role information can you give an example?

Not really; multiple people can look scummy at once

His last wish was to see me lynched. He was the only vote on Sloth. Why wouldn't he (as town) join Looker on my wagon?

Parentheses don't match; I can't tell if there's a second part to this

No second part.

When it's you asking people to provide a precise case against you, quite possibly.

When did I do that?

[Vi]

1) Gambits are the first one that comes to mind, though that probably wasn't the case here.
2) If he was actually getting lynched, what would that have done? The point is that it's not the silver bullet you're making it out to be.
4) Post 284 is one example.

[Empking]

1) Gambits are the first one that comes to mind, though that probably wasn't the case here.

2) If he was actually getting lynched, what would that have done?

Makes the Vote Count more represantive of what is actually the case. What harm would it do?

The point is that it's not the silver bullet you're making it out to be.

Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?

4) Post 284 is one example.

You were making an absolute stament about "all" my posts. Surely its a null tell to want to unambigiously disprove that?

[Vi]

Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?

I think Quilford can answer that.

You were making an absolute stament about "all" my posts. Surely its a null tell to want to unambigiously disprove that?

I refuse to believe you are this pedantic.

[Empking]

Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?

I think Quilford can answer that.

Quilford can read your mind?

You were making an absolute stament about "all" my posts. Surely its a null tell to want to unambigiously disprove that?

I refuse to believe you are this pedantic.

Of course not. That's why I asked you to clarify the period time your "all" refered to.

[Vi]

Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?

I think Quilford can answer that.

Quilford can read your mind?

I doubt it.~
I know what my answer is, but I'd like to see what Qwilfish says.

You were making an absolute stament about "all" my posts. Surely its a null tell to want to unambigiously disprove that?

I refuse to believe you are this pedantic.

Of course not. That's why I asked you to clarify the period time your "all" refered to.

You can figure it out yourself.

You're not convincing me, and this is just wasting space and time.

[Empking]

Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?

I think Quilford can answer that.

Quilford can read your mind?

I doubt it.~
I know what my answer is, but I'd like to see what Qwilfish says.

Yet you make no attempt to get Quilfish to say something?

[hiplop]

Unvote
Vote Empking

Zero scumhunting, way too much defending of himself with no real pressure

at all

(like half to 3/4 of his posts are this), and a poor vote on Quilford.

Scumreads: Empking, Scott, and Twisted Spoon. (In that order)
Townreads: Vi, Quilford, Charter, Zdenek, Faraday. (In that order)

Hiplop, you may have already answered this question, but why exactly did you ask if Quilford was at L-1?

I explained this a few times, im playing two games currently, and i was tired, i got them mixed up. I really just didnt want to hammer, nothing worse than a hammer thaats way too early/un needed.

OK im back from my V/LA so i can play ..better

Empking is definitely being scummy, though im not prepared to switch my vote from quilford yet, need a tad bit more convincing i suppose.

My list would look like this

Town
Faraday
Charter
Twisted Spoon
Neuky

Null (AH lots of nulls this game :/)
Scottie
Darth Yoshi - only null due to juls, i have found darth to be fairly pro-town, but i got a scumvibe from juls
pappums
vi
and *probably* if i missed anyone, they're in this category

scum

Quilford
Empking

[Vi]

Why do you think Quilford didn't vote me?

I think Quilford can answer that.

Quilford can read your mind?

I doubt it.~
I know what my answer is, but I'd like to see what Qwilfish says.

Yet you make no attempt to get Quilfish to say something?

I think Quilford can see that remark in passing.

Empking is definitely being scummy, though im not prepared to switch my vote from quilford yet, need a tad bit more convincing i suppose.

Isn't your vote on quilford just for pressure anyway?

[hiplop]

Just for pressure? no.

I was adding pressure with the vote, i think hes scum