Empking wrote:I forgot
Really?
guess i`ll have to check my read on you again.
Empking:
0-1: enforces follow the cop (second one hammers 'speed things up' 3x nolynch)
2: called the doc 'pretty obvious scum' in response to a post calling 3 people scummy (1 is confirmed town, 2 were scum)
3-5: actual follow the cop
6: "2 investigations left ,right?", either requesting information that will follow anyway(trying to look usefull), or gloating over probably having wasted an investigation?
7: pulls out a quote to justify a gutread
8: hops on the easiest wagon (the one i read as a trap)
9: votes the first to bite (who makes a remark about bussing while biting)
10-13: defends this vote from a suspicious cop
14: practically denies the 'trap'-explenation (while subtile- pointing at TBM for not reading the votes)
15: asks kingpin to explain his(own: empking`s) actions
16: claiming to have more reasons than the 'too eager' to go after lane (that reaction was confirmation)
17: rules clarification
18: calls for reads/discussion, doesn`t react to the fact no response follows
19: 'i`m not going to just wait this out, but will vote in such a manner'
20-22: calls for nolynch, basically goes 'oops' when having pointed out this was the worst possible move (another 'unintentional trap'?)
So empking:
On what was your read on lane based prior to the 'too eager'-post?
Asuming the read was there, why did you claim your votes(posts) prior to that point were RVS (your 'ranger vote'- was a 'just out of rvs one')
@Bella: care to clearup/explain your last post?
By the way, your mum says hello.