Flavor has been written for the Day 3 and Night 3 scenes.
There's a spiffy new countdown tag! It's in the OP.
Equinox wrote:
Equinox wrote:pandabear (3) - bristep123, GreyICE, Sn1pe29
Sn1pe29 (3) - Nachomamma8, tarsonisocelot, pandabear
Traveller (2) - King of Harolds, thil13
King of Harolds (1) - Traveller
With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.[/color]
Voidedmafia wrote:While I agree with the fact that the vote-flopping was bad, but Panda's change to Nacho with just as little reasoning would have to be just as bad.
pandabear wrote:Voidedmafia wrote:While I agree with the fact that the vote-flopping was bad, but Panda's change to Nacho with just as little reasoning would have to be just as bad.
I've been doing this whether my vote was one a scum or not and I agreed with Hero's analysis on Nacho.
pandabear wrote:Right now, I've been rereading both of your posts and have been trying to find reasons to believe GreyIce is scum and Thil/Voided is not, but I really can't.
pandabear wrote:There was a point where Grey, early on, really supported Nacho, because he is IC and giving him a "town-read" to start scum hunting. But, his opinion changed after hearing from Hero, and the timing of his change did not seem like bussing to me.
pandabear wrote: As for Thil, I can't find any posts that give him any town cred. He lurks til he's prodded about 3 times, then posts meaningless filler to just hide back into lurking mode again.
pandabear wrote:As for you, Voided, I understand that you were away IRL during our Nacho vote, but part of me wants to think that your attempt at reads during our wagon on Nacho was just an attempt to try and start a different wagon on someone more scummy.
pandabear wrote:And, the fact that Grey's not dead has been really irking me, but I think Voided you decided to kill Traveller instead because he may have had a strong FOS on you.
pandabear wrote:I want to ask, why did you think he thought it was you? It could have been any of us.
pandabear wrote:Oh yah, and Thil kept saying "Why me" every time someone pointed at him...and we know what that means: "WHY ME FRY ME"
pandabear wrote:I'm thinking of voting for you really soon, but I'm willing to hear your case to change my mind
GreyICE wrote:@Voided: you said a lot of what Tarsonis did wasn't very town at all yesterday when you voted. What specifically did you see that wasn't very town?
GreyICE wrote:Why did you think that Traveller suspected you?
Voidedmafia wrote:GreyICE wrote:@Voided: you said a lot of what Tarsonis did wasn't very town at all yesterday when you voted. What specifically did you see that wasn't very town?
...I've hit a brain fart trying to think of how I can put this. You may interpret this as "A HA! VM doesn't have anything against her for her vote!" But I still feel like my vote analysis and the things that both Traveller (about her never voting for Nacho AT ALL) and Panda (don't remember what he said about her) answered this.
Voidedmafia wrote:GreyICE wrote:Why did you think that Traveller suspected you?
Already answered above.
GreyICE wrote:Panda, why did you trust me and Hero when we said to hammer the claimed cop? Your vote had been on hero, and you already said if Nacho flipped town you were going to be suspicious of both of us. Did it occur to you that if Nacho was town the scum would have known he was the real cop, and thus been quite happy to lynch him?
Also, do you think Nacho would defend a newbie scumbuddy on day 1 or push them?
What information would you have gained out of Hero's lynch?
pandabear wrote:GreyICE wrote:Panda, why did you trust me and Hero when we said to hammer the claimed cop? Your vote had been on hero, and you already said if Nacho flipped town you were going to be suspicious of both of us. Did it occur to you that if Nacho was town the scum would have known he was the real cop, and thus been quite happy to lynch him?
Also, do you think Nacho would defend a newbie scumbuddy on day 1 or push them?
What information would you have gained out of Hero's lynch?
1) I trusted you guys in the fact that more cases than not, a person put on a wagon that claims cop (during L-1) is scum. If he indeed was cop, then I'd definitely be suspicious of Hero and we'd probably have lynched him. I'd also be suspicious of you if Nacho was town. But he wasn't.
2) I don't know what Nacho would do, as this is my first game and Nacho seems to be a very good player so it's hard to know what his play style this game is. A Nacho-Thil/Void seems like he is distancing and pushing slightly, but avoids it by focusing more on other newbies like me and Sn1pe. But, a Nacho-GreyICE is almost the opposite in that you guys almost defended each other through the "Let's respect the IC and never ever lynch him D1" code.
Nachomamma8 wrote:It really depends on the extent to the town-claiming, in my opinion. The fact that I had to check back to find it tells me that tan's wasn't suspicious.
Right now, I would be OK lynching either snipe or panda. Both have seemed fairly suspicious to me up to this point compared to everyone else.
Nachomamma8 wrote:I'd much rather cut off the head of the snake first, and meanwhile pray to mafia gods that thil will get involved or get replaced. There's still a chance he's town, and could have a nice big epiphany, or could be replaced by someone obvtown.