00s Band Mafia (Game Over!)

[chesskid3]

which is a pretty serious scumtell for early d1 stuff since screaming WIFOM shuts discussion down which is heavily pro-scum sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

scum or your money back

[nintendoaddict1]

Wine, every bit of it.

I fail to understand the statement.

First, you bring up the

possibility

of a lie detector. Then, you call yourself Town. What don't you understand? Like I said, calling yourself Town doesn't make you scum, but it doesn't make you Town either.

P. Edit: That's what I was just doing, actually. Here you go, C.

I don't understand how what you said in 88 matches these statements here. Does Wine mean something that I don't know about?

You... don't know what Wine is?

[nintendoaddict1]

which is a pretty serious scumtell for early d1 stuff since screaming WIFOM shuts discussion down which is heavily pro-scum sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

scum or your money back

To be clear, your reason for voting me is because I brought up Wine?

If not, then, what is?

[C-Worl]

Wine is an alcoholic drink. It's also something you do when you're not getting you way. Other than those definitions, no, I don't know what Wine is.

[Slaxx]

No longer reserved. Posting Filler. I must be scum. Lulz.

[Pine]

Well to answer Reg who asked my thoughts on chess and Pine,

chesskid3: Not much content, one-line posts, yeah.

Pine: ISO #1 he admits his vote has nothing to do with alignment or reads, bad. ISO #4, what are you waiting for a response on? Throughout his ISO, he defends C-Worl a number of times, basing it on his personal meta. Well, what about those of us who have no meta on C-W? Do our opinions and reads on him not matter because we should just trust you?

Wow. This is almost pure badposting. Just about everything you said is out of context or exaggerated. I'll let chess defend himself from this weaksauce attack. (PE: He already did. Adroitly, I might add.)

ISO #1 he admits his vote has nothing to do with alignment or reads, bad.

- I stated my reasons. Alignment and reads (which are really the same thing) are not the only thing to base one's vote on. You could make the exact same argument of everyone who placed a random vote at the beginning, and with better effect.

ISO #4, what are you waiting for a response on?

- None of your damn business, it's communication between me and the mod.

Throughout his ISO, he defends C-Worl a number of times, basing it on his personal meta.

- I defended him on exactly one, solitary point. And not particularly vigorously.

Well, what about those of us who have no meta on C-W? Do our opinions and reads on him not matter because we should just trust you?

- Meta is a tool. If you don't have it, do research on the people you're playing with or play in more games. I've played with C-Worl more than anyone else on the site, and more than anyone else here. I'm in a hydra with him. So yeah. Unless you want to go all in and declare that we're both scum and I'm just covering for him over such a minuscule point, I'd say a little trust on this goes a long way.

Nintendo, you've coasted thus far based on the fact that you

scream

"newbie". It's wearing thin, and gross misrepresentation like this pushes my suspicion that you're actively taking advantage of this appearance.

UNVOTE: chesskid
VOTE: Nintendo

[C-Worl]

Googled it so Wine is part of WIFOM (Wine in front of me) I always thought WIFOM was just a word for set up speculation (i was close) never bothered to actually ask what the acronym stood for.

Well now that that's clear.

My post wasn't WIFOM entirely and I agree with chesskid that the use of Wine or WIFOM most accurately shuts down discussion.

Unvote; Vote: Nintendo

At least if I'm wrong I get my money back.

[Slaxx]

Vote Count 1.02

Gorilla

: Gaoth

Scumhunter

: Talapus

Parabollocks

: Nicodemus

Regfan

: Scumhunter

NintendoAddict1 (5)

: Parabollocks, Hiraki, Chesskid3, Pine, C-worl

Gaoth (2)

: Regfan, Demonhybrid

C-worl (2)

: Gorilla, NintendoAddict1

Not Voting:

Diddin, evilpacman18, tarsonisoceot

Deadline in 13 Days, 12 Hours.
16 Alive, 9 to lynch.

[C-Worl]

No longer reserved. Posting Filler. I must be scum. Lulz.

Vote: Slaxx

He admited to being scum.

[nintendoaddict1]

Well if you guys want me to claim tomorrow I will, but right now it's late and I need to get to bed.

[DemonHybrid]

Dude, you're 4 votes to a lynch. Why would you feel like you need to claim?

[evilpacman18]

Dude, you're 4 votes to a lynch. Why would you feel like you need to claim?

God I hate this logic. Waiting until it's extremely unlikely that claiming will get you unvoted enough to save yourself is anti-wincon no matter what you're playing. I like mid-wagon claims. Gives the town enough time to react to it properly.

[Pine]

Dude, you're 4 votes to a lynch. Why would you feel like you need to claim?

God I hate this logic. Waiting until it's extremely unlikely that claiming will get you unvoted enough to save yourself is anti-wincon no matter what you're playing. I like mid-wagon claims. Gives the town enough time to react to it properly.

I've never heard this point articulated before, and I find that I like it. L-1 claims are nearly futile most of the time.

[Regfan]

Claiming is very situational based, in this particular situation five pages and less than 24 hours into the game claiming is idiotic though.

[DemonHybrid]

Hell, I do L-2 claims all the time, but L-4?

[evilpacman18]

Claiming is very situational based, in this particular situation five pages and less than 24 hours into the game claiming is idiotic though.

An equally fair point. I just hate when people are like "wut u claymed nd ur not at l1? SCUMZORZ"

[gorilla]

I think what's more significant here is the lack of a response to any of the arguments being made

yes offering to claim at L-4 in a 16 player game is strange but ignoring the arguments being made against you and not trying to defend is worse and reflects poorly on him

in fact i feel like giving him greater incentive to claim because of that

UNVOTE:
VOTE: nintendoaddict1

[nintendoaddict1]

I think what's more significant here is the lack of a response to any of the arguments being made

yes offering to claim at L-4 in a 16 player game is strange but ignoring the arguments being made against you and not trying to defend is worse and reflects poorly on him

in fact i feel like giving him greater incentive to claim because of that

UNVOTE:
VOTE: nintendoaddict1

Okay, screw insomnia.
To what lack of responses are you referring?
As for not trying to defend myself, I was trying to get to sleep.
And fine.

Blink-182 and the song is Roller Coaster. I don't have an Encore song.

[C-Worl]

The song rocks and I buy the claim.

Unvote

[gorilla]

but you never said you were going to answer them later, you just asked if they want you to claim

it looked like giving up for no reason to me

idgi

[Parabollocks]

The song rocks and I buy the claim.

Unvote

I agree to disagree, Nintendo has done too many things legitimately scummy just get a vote off from his claim, noting he doesn't have an encore song, he probably doesn't have any specific powers so it's safe to say i wouldn't mind a roleclaim too.

Oh and reads for everyone:

Town - Parabollocks (:P) Chesskid3, Gorilla, evilpacman18
Null - Demonhybrid (leaning scum) Diddin, tarsonisoceot, scumhunter, talapus, Gaoth, RegFan (leaning town.)
Scum - Pine, NintendoAddict1

[Parabollocks]

Add C-Worl down to the scum list too, he seemed to slip my mind.

[C-Worl]

Add C-Worl down to the scum list too, he seemed to slip my mind.

Slipped ur mind cuz I'm town. It'd be nice if there were actual reasons for ur reads, it'd go along way in me actually caring about them. That's just a tip though.

[Parabollocks]

yes but this also could benefit scum, nameclaiming just causes flavor speculation and then people get off-task at the game at hand.

also, did i mention it could benefit scum?

As far as I can tell the benefits exceed the negatives greatly. I don't see much possible that scum can gain from band-claiming, if you have something you believe they would please share. The longer we delay name-claiming the more time we allow for scum to come up with their fake-claims.

it's a win lose situation, while you give scum less time to make-up name claims, you also give up an idea of the basis of flavor, if you get what i mean.

not only that, but it also outs any potential PR's, more mainstream bands or perhaps more popular bands are more likely to have special powers, unlike 'smallish' bands like..well..blink-182. (as Nintendo claimed)

and once again, it causes flavor speculation, i don't see the need to bandclaim right now at all, but i can see benefits in the future.

Nameclaim should be done today but slightly later, after people have reads, so it can be done popcorn style. Easier to catch scum that way cuz otherwise the scum could wait it out and claim based on what bands have already been claimed, the type of music being used, etc.

basically this.

Also, C-Worl, to answer your question -

Since we're asking what if questions, "What if I stuck my pecker in a toaster? What would happen then?"

Seriously, the discussion seems stupid right now.

you would have more miscarriages then tim buckley.

i'm not sure what you meant by 'discussion' scumhunter was the one who asked the question, and it was obviously a joke, you taking it that blunt is retarded and scummy.

Since we're asking what if questions, "What if I stuck my pecker in a toaster? What would happen then?"
Seriously, the discussion seems stupid right now.

You'll need to be more specific, which posts do you believe are 'what if' questions and do you find the people asking them to be scummy due to it? Also, if you believe the discussion was 'stupid' right now why not attempt to move conversation elsewhere?

Exactly, fluff post that contributed zero to anything but drawing suspicion towards yourself.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: C-Worl

ugh @ this. very ugh.

1) Scumhunter was asking the what if questions.
2) I don't find it scummy I just find it stupid.
3) Because by acknowledging that the convo is stupid you identify that it's an easy place for scum to hide.

1)okay, so you admit that you thought what scumhunter said was stupid but instead instigated it as a main argument.
2)scummy=/=stupid=/=VI it's the circle of derp, and clearly you keep running in circles.
3) "if we do this, the other person will do that, so we should do this instead of that so he can do this."

3) Because by acknowledging that the convo is stupid you identify that it's an easy place for scum to hide.
If you believe such conversation is an easy spot for mafia to hide wouldn't allowing it to continue and then assesing who took part in it be optimal?

I found who I think to be scummy from it and now I'm watching them to see their connections.

I'm not sure i understand what groundbreaking evidence you got from that, do tell.

I wasn't speaking for you. I was offering my POV and possible scenarios that I thought of to fit it. Way to overreact, "bro"

way to completely redirect, bro.

My post wasn't WIFOM entirely and I agree with chesskid that the use of Wine or WIFOM most accurately shuts down discussion.

Unvote; Vote: Nintendo

At least if I'm wrong I get my money back.

so scummy dude, so scummy.

tl;dr

the least i have got out of you is that you refuse to mandate anything relevant("why should we be asking questions? what does he mean by that? IT MUST BE A SCUMTELL")but instead 'hide' (to your definition) between people and other discussion, you have yet to make a case, post something about your reads, etc. you constantly are the middleman in everything, and i don't like middlemen.

[chesskid3]

Unvote