Nobody Special wrote:I can't believe how blind you guys are.
I mean,
really.
Vote: Mastin
I know I'm not one to speak, but
this
is your first post after a 3 day absence!?! I agree with Pine's response: "Care to explain?"
Also, it has been almost a week since that post. Where are you?
@mod: Prod Nobody Special
SubzeroSith wrote:I'd also like to direct everyone to Nothing Special's ISO.
0: Answering my questions. Fine.
1: Better than average random vote, but still not particularly good.
2: Empty.
3: "Uh wut I'm confused."
4: Worthless.
5: Almost looks like a random vote.
I've seen people do more scum hunting on page 1 than this guy has the whole game so far. Don't like it.
Agree. And note: this is still all his iso contains, almost one week later.
mastin2 wrote:Just hit me.
If my VCA implicated Pine (which it did), and you're curious about my VCA this game (which implicates you)...
...Is that a scumclaim?
(This...probably makes more sense in my head than it does to anyone else, but the chain of thought is there, if you understand my wavelength of thought.
)
Really mastin? Really? He is assuming that your VCA did NOT implicate Pine. That kind of play is not what I expect from you mastin. So yeah, it definitely makes more sense in your head than mine! This is one of the few non-scummy things coming from him.
On a side note, I really don't remember what you VCA indicated about Pine, and I don't really care about this particular (useless and distracting) argument to go reread that game. The point is moot.
silverbullet999 wrote:mastin you lynch me first, if i flip town you lynch sub, if I flip scum... well you'll lynch sub anyway I hope but yeah, if I flip town you'll lynch sub anyway. Deal?
What kind of logic is this!?
MrZepher wrote:I think Mastin hates me ._.
In other news:
My biggest scum reads happen to be Sub and Amor
Which now that I think about my vote is still on nhammen...
I'll double check to see if I want to keep it there...
In any case, I'd hate to use the argument "to town to be town" but Sub seems to fall into that argument. Idk. Something about the way he scumhunts doesn't sit well with me.
Silver come off as town, but ridiculous town. There's room for me to be proven wrong though.
So many things to say about this post, even if your vote had been on me:
A) You can't remember where your own vote is or why it is there? Isn't that a sign that maybe you should, I dunno, move your vote?
B) You thought your vote was on me, and thought you might prefer it to be on me than either one of the players you named as a scumread? Why does that even make sense?
C) You have to say what the something about why the way Sub scumhunts doesn't sit well with you. You can't just say something is wrong, and use that as a case.
MrZepher wrote:Idk what's wrong with me @-@ sorry. But at least that explains why i wasn't sure why I thought I had my vote on nhammen....
Unvote
Also, why am I scum exactly?
Cuz you can't remember where your own vote is.
Cuz instead of voting one of the players you list as a scumread, you unvote.
Because the examples of cases you have presented so far in this game are: "scummy for whatever reason" and "doesn't sit well with me". And you don't even vote either of these cases.
Most posts in your iso give no reason for any "suspicion" you have had. There are a few. It seems that your strategy is to say someone is scummy, and then come up with reasons later.
jmurph3 wrote:Also, can someone explain to me the hate aimed at Subzero at the moment? I've read his ISO and I'm really not getting it.
Not getting it here either.
MrZepher wrote:With Sub, the way he approaches his scum-hunting is very nit-picky, and he is very eager to discredit arguments made against him.
At least that's why he's suspect with me. I'm still wary about the other cases on him, but the way he's reacted to them thus far hasn't sat well with me.
(take the interaction with Sub vs Silver for example, and then with Mastin too.)
At this point I think I may be tunneling on you, but would you mind saying why nit-picky implies scum? Also, what about his reaction hasn't sat well with you. Stop being vague with your cases and say something concrete!
MrZepher wrote:With Amor, it's mostly gut (Sub has some gut in it as well) BUT I don't like the way you take Thor's "coaching" and Maxous' 122 and blatantly misrep them.
I just isoed Amor to see what you were talking abut, because I thought that it was KoC that had problems with Thor's "coaching". Amor didn't think Thor was coaching, and I saw no misreps regarding either Thor or Maxous. Amor's criticism of Maxous is one of the few things that I agreed with him about! So, again, I'd like to know why you don't like these "misreps".
MrZepher wrote:Amor wrote:
No one seems to agree with me about Knight so...
Unvote
Vote: Toon Fighter
reads as: This wagon isn't going to kick off. Let's hop onto one that'll probably go through.
Of course this assuming you're scum, which I'm not sure what the likelyhood of that is yet.
Probably somewhat likely at this time and place.
However, I do agree with this. Amor's unvote doesn't look good.
MrZepher wrote:Just as a note, I'm not voting yet because I don't think they need votes on them yet, or at least not from me if that makes sense.
It doesn't. Votes don't just lead to lynches. Votes create pressure that the players on the other end are forced to react to. Votes allow us to read the person that is voting. Refusing to vote at all is anti-town.
mastin2 wrote:Yes. I think my VCA nailed all the scum.
No. I don't know all the scum without flips. Because my INTERPRETATION of the VCA isn't perfect.
I made that quite clear. (I did, didn't I? I certainly thought I mentioned that at some point.)
To be honest, in TWWB, as scum, I found your VCA to be quite amusingly wrong. Your VCAs operate on too many false assumptions. Such as the horrible "scum don't want to all be on the same wagon" assumption. I specifically remember reading you saying something about that, and then looking at the votecount and seeing all of the scum on the same wagon, and laughing my ass off. If you do not account for the meta of the players in question, your VCA techniques are as useless as random lynching. Some players never vote on the same wagon as their buddies as scum, and some always do. Assuming that all players have the same meta is horribly wrong. But this is a topic for MD, so I need to stop discussing this here. It will just be a distraction.
----- bottom of page 10 -----
Yes, I intend to have another wall in a few more hours. eeep