Talapus wrote:No player yet in this game is Obv Town or Obv Scum and it's been addressed before yet here it is again. I just don't get it.
so caught
so very, very caught
gorilla wrote:
so caught
so very, very caught
gorilla wrote:You're writing fluff posts, you're not scumhunting. You're being over-reactive and shifty. Your entire attitude is "It's day 1 it's too early to know anything" which seems to be a big part of why you're voting Gaoth. flavor speculation is dumb because it is not helpful: even though slaxx doesn't provide fakeclaims, there were enough artists working within the rock genre last decade for scum to have an incredibly large pool of fakeclaims to choose from. It is not a productive line of discussion. Calling people (obv) scum/town is good because it gets reactions and generates discussion by putting out reads. Sometimes it's a bit of hyperbole. Not here though, you're obvscum. Writing huge wallposts where you complain about how it's impossible for anyone to know right now is just trying to shut down discussion, which isn't helpful, and just makes you look like you're upset and confused as to how you were caught so soon.
Hiraki wrote:Hey idiots.
Stop arguing and sheep me.
I actually found something decent and definite.
I have scum, you may have scum depending my analysis of your case.
Which I will do sometime.
Maybe not.
Hiraki wrote:
217 is really bad because Tarson is using the logic that X has contributed more than twice, when he has 3 posts.
3.
He hasn't given any to much content. This is my wagon mofos.
Vote: Tarsonalot
Regfan wrote:I normally avoid doing these however I feel it's needed in this case.
Regfan wrote:
Talapus ISO
Post #3 - State more conversation is needed while not adding any real conversation or discussion yourself - Contradiction here.
Wrong, I said, "Ya, we definitely need more peeps in here talking before we consider dropping band names." Granted I didn't drop my band name at the time, but neither did several others. Not really a contradiction.
Regfan wrote:
Post #8 - Instant removal of the vote the second it was pointed out.
Regfan wrote:Post #9 - Defends his vote on C-Worl saying that it was reasonable.
Regfan wrote:
Post #13 - Defensivesness over Gorillas assesment of your play.[
Regfan wrote:So lets summarize:
- You contradicted yourself earlier by stating that more discussion was needed without adding any discussion yourself
Regfan wrote:
- You posted several fluff posts while throwing a policy vote on C-Worl which you quickly retracted.
- You stated suspicion towards Nintendo for his early claim, however refrained from stating your read on him later.
Regfan wrote:
- You put forward a shotty case against Gaoth in which you state you don't care if people agree with your reasoning or not.