chesskid3 wrote:CryMeARiver wrote:Oh, no she didn't. I'm stuck in SitMOAII where wizards were town. Sup guys.
GUESS WHO DID JUST SLIP
TINFOIL ACTIVATE
also I want solid meat on ABRTown. Anyone.
chesskid3 wrote:CryMeARiver wrote:Oh, no she didn't. I'm stuck in SitMOAII where wizards were town. Sup guys.
GUESS WHO DID JUST SLIP
Soben wrote:IceyCupcake wrote:You're calling us town yet not helping with the voting?
As far as I can tell, the risks involved with following your orders greatly outweight the benefits.
Soben wrote:
inHimshalibe wrote: Well, Beef's town imo.
Mind explaining the town-read on Beff, not seeing it myself.
Pine and inHimshallibe wrote: Only if Icey is something other than Town, which you already stated you think they are. So, which is it? Compliance commensurate with your earlier confidence, or fabricated reads?
Scum not gonna fence themselves in early when these games have a propensity for role madness.inHimshallibe wrote:Straight-up answering ABR's question. Unless they're both scum, but I doubt it.Soben wrote:
inHimshalibe wrote: Well, Beef's town imo.
Mind explaining the town-read on Beff, not seeing it myself.
With no associative tells to be established how can you say someone is town but still possibly third party?Soben wrote:Pine and inHimshallibe wrote: Only if Icey is something other than Town, which you already stated you think they are. So, which is it? Compliance commensurate with your earlier confidence, or fabricated reads?
I'll attempt to reexplain it because it seems you're having difficulty understanding. I currently have atown-readon IceyCupcake. Thistown-readis based around the fact that I fail to see any real scum-motivation behind his outright demand as it directs attention towards him instantly. I do however see a possibilty that Icey is indeedthird party, thus following his orders involves immese risk whereas not doing so has no real harm.
inHimshallibe wrote:With no associative tells to be established how can you say someone is town but still possibly third party?
OP wrote: Roles and factions: This is a rather vanilla-less setup. All factions have a winnable condition. If a win condition is achieved, and it doesn't directly interfere with the win condition of another faction, the game will keep on. For example, if the win condition of a player is to get certain player lynched, should that player achieve that condition (and no other win condition is achieved at the same time), the game can keep on. There is at least one town faction and one scum faction. Town faction is called Sorcerers, while scum faction is called Wizards. Other factions may exist, and they may have wizards, sorcerers, or other classes.
There isn't a sample vanilla role in the first couple of posts. Proof by moderator-given information.CryMeARiver wrote:gandalf5166 wrote:Nope. If you read the rules this time, they say that it is a mostly vanillaless game. Not sure what that means, but w/e.
I did read them. I knew it said mostly. Therefore I question why Beefy thinks there are none.
I feel there's some disconnect in reading Icey as Town, realizing that if Icey is indeed some third party with an alt win condition it won't preclude town from a win, and then not following your Town read of Icey by following their plan.Soben wrote:inHimshallibe wrote:With no associative tells to be established how can you say someone is town but still possibly third party?
OP wrote: Roles and factions: This is a rather vanilla-less setup. All factions have a winnable condition. If a win condition is achieved, and it doesn't directly interfere with the win condition of another faction, the game will keep on. For example, if the win condition of a player is to get certain player lynched, should that player achieve that condition (and no other win condition is achieved at the same time), the game can keep on. There is at least one town faction and one scum faction. Town faction is called Sorcerers, while scum faction is called Wizards. Other factions may exist, and they may have wizards, sorcerers, or other classes.
The OP implies multiple third party roles in the setup, Iceys win condition could simply be to recieve x amount of votes during the game thus although I don't see him as scum I have no reason to vote him.
Post #126 by Katy - So SGR is "pretty obv. scum." but you don't vote him? Explain.