Mini 1138 - Candy Zoo Mafia (Game Over!)

Morthas · Post Post #1300 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2011 10:15 am

Wait, N2 - No Action? You didn't mention anything about not being able to hide every night.

Pine · Post Post #1301 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2011 10:28 am

Convenient that he didn't use his protect/investigate power until just last night. Especially given that two of our first deaths were non-Candy Animal Town, which means that the protective aspect is far less valuable now.

Nah.

Fakeclaim.

VOTE: Hoppster

ToastyToast · Post Post #1302 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2011 11:39 am

Morthas wrote:Wait, N2 - No Action? You didn't mention anything about not being able to hide every night.

Let me just answer this obvious incident of someone forgetting about D2. Hoppster claimed and said he would not act so that a zoo visitor could target him and help bring truth to his claim.

Hazard with a Glove · Post Post #1303 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2011 1:05 pm

VLA

Busy as heck and don't think I'll have much time at a computer at all. for a little bit. At latest I think I'll be good by Wednesday, but I'm going to try my best to Keep up with this game.

ToastyToast · Post Post #1304 (ISO) » Fri May 20, 2011 4:07 pm

@Hoppster: With regards to your claim, does it say that your protection is guaranteed? Given the whole weak and coward thing, it sounds is if you are more of a weak doc that dies if scum is targeted. Which makes you a type of advanced hider.

Charlie · Post Post #1305 (ISO) » Sat May 21, 2011 6:30 am

Vote count 32

Hoppster (2) - vezokpiraka, Pine

Not voting: Hazard with a Glove, ToastyToast, Morthas, Zyrconium, Hoppster
With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.
Deadline is on Friday, 10th June at 1100 hours (GMT-5)

Hoppster · Post Post #1306 (ISO) » Sat May 21, 2011 11:29 am

Pine wrote:Convenient that he didn't use his protect/investigate power until just last night. Especially given that two of our first deaths were non-Candy Animal Town, which means that the protective aspect is far less valuable now.

Nah.

Fakeclaim.

VOTE: Hoppster

*sigh*

I don't understand what you expect me to do about this. I thought my Night actions were perfectly logical (and stand by that). Perhaps you would have played my role differently, but why is this lynch-worthy?

ToastyToast wrote:@Hoppster: With regards to your claim, does it say that your protection is guaranteed? Given the whole weak and coward thing, it sounds is if you are more of a weak doc that dies if scum is targeted. Which makes you a type of advanced hider.

Umm, what do you mean by guaranteed?

I assume that if I am roleblocked the protection will fail. Just like any other protection. It's also implied that it only protects 'once' - ie, if there were two people trying to kill the same person and I protected them, the number of kills would override my (one) protect.

Pine · Post Post #1307 (ISO) » Sat May 21, 2011 3:33 pm

The claim isn't lynch-worthy, everything else is. You chose to hide or do nothing three out of four nights, those nights when getting innocent results and maybe protecting a night kill were important. The Town reaction to that role would be to protect/investigate as much as you could in the early game, and now in the late game (with most or all non-candy animal Town dead) to hide and hope for a misfire to get a no-kill night.

The fakeclaim you produced is designed to commit yourself to admitting as few innocents as possible, and only claiming your biggest opponent as innocent to gain an ally.

Lynch is Hoppster today, folks.

ToastyToast · Post Post #1308 (ISO) » Sat May 21, 2011 5:43 pm

ToastyToast wrote:@Hoppster: With regards to your claim, does it say that your protection is guaranteed? Given the whole weak and coward thing, it sounds is if you are more of a weak doc that dies if scum is targeted. Which makes you a type of advanced hider.

Umm, what do you mean by guaranteed?

I assume that if I am roleblocked the protection will fail. Just like any other protection. It's also implied that it only protects 'once' - ie, if there were two people trying to kill the same person and I protected them, the number of kills would override my (one) protect.[/quote]

I'm saying that you role only matches your flavor if you are a weak doctor of some sort. A protection role by a "weak" and "cowardly" person doesn't make much sense to me.

ToastyToast · Post Post #1309 (ISO) » Sat May 21, 2011 5:43 pm

quote faill.

Pine · Post Post #1310 (ISO) » Sat May 21, 2011 5:47 pm

Why are you not voting for Hoppster, TT? Morthas isn't the lynch right now.

ToastyToast · Post Post #1311 (ISO) » Sat May 21, 2011 5:53 pm

Pine wrote:Why are you not voting for Hoppster, TT? Morthas isn't the lynch right now.

trust me, I've been pondering it. Have been considering if his case on CP is something scum would do in order to help clear themselves (attack a likely viable lynch-buddy)

Vote:Hoppster

ToastyToast · Post Post #1312 (ISO) » Sun May 22, 2011 5:59 pm

Okay, its been over a day and no one has commented. What is going on. People who aren't voting, give us your biggest suspect (and,preferably, vote them. This is unproductive

Pine · Post Post #1313 (ISO) » Sun May 22, 2011 6:05 pm

^I agree

vezokpiraka · Post Post #1314 (ISO) » Mon May 23, 2011 12:46 am

Vote hopster already.

Zyrconium · Post Post #1315 (ISO) » Mon May 23, 2011 9:45 am

Hrmm, I'll stick a vote on Hoppster if I get really bored.... but I'd prefer Hazard or Morthas(Hazard a lot more)...

@Pine: mind looking over mb's posts pertaining to Hoppster and telling me what you see?

Morthas · Post Post #1316 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 1:20 am

Wow 3 days already =/
What are the Pros for his lynch? Anyone got anything to say that might stop his lynch?
I think we get confirmation whenever Hazard is confirmed non-scum if we lynch Hoppster, right?

Pine · Post Post #1317 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 1:58 am

Morthas, could you possibly drag your feet more? I'm starting to suspect you as traitor. Mafia buddy would have hammered. Town would have either provided good reasons not to lynch or hammered. Traitor about to lose with scumbuddy hanged would equivocate, fail to hammer, and flail. It also explains the odd balance issues and your scummy behavior

Morthas · Post Post #1318 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 2:37 am

Pine · Post Post #1319 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 2:41 am

I didn't stutter. The case has been presented, and you're dragging your feet instead of either making a decision or providing a counter-case.

Morthas · Post Post #1320 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 2:51 am

Why are you telling me what I would do in a given situation?
I am sorry if i am very busy with exams and cannot use time to re read and look for slips and tells .
It doesn't matter to me what you think of my behavior since as town i do not need to pretend.
So wait you are telling me, im not scum nor town?
I don't like hammering before everyone agrees (or atleast the majority does), since i myself am not sure if i want to or not yet. (hence why im asking if anyone has anything to say that might influence me to go for the hammer or not)
If i was a traitor, i would get modkilled right? What does me being still alive still mean?

P-Edit: Finally looked up what the expression ''dragging your feet'' means (English isn't my national language).
I guess? I'm not providing a counter case since im too busy if that's what your asking.

Pine · Post Post #1321 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 3:02 am

Traitor role. Dragging your feet means that you're intentionally delaying and holding up the process.

Calling you a Traitor was intended to provoke a response, and I withdraw the suspicion. The above post is believable.

Morthas · Post Post #1322 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 3:05 am

Ah sorry, i was unfamiliar with that role >.<

Pine · Post Post #1323 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 3:27 am

Seriously, though, make a decision. There isn't a whole lot of material to go through, Hoppster is caught scum.

Zyrconium · Post Post #1324 (ISO) » Tue May 24, 2011 3:39 am

Zyrconium wrote:@Pine: mind looking over mb's posts pertaining to Hoppster and telling me what you see?

That a "yes" Pine?