Okay, I am getting a confirmed town read from Low Key. I like his level of logic, he seems more pro than ZMuffinMan.
FoS Spadile
Spadile (
Neutral-read *Leaning town
)
Reason: Well after our conversations, it's time to end this. You are off my scum-suspects list, I know have a Neutral-read on you. A townie would never go this far as to defend against an attacker, it's true that we are both getting a bit emotional, and a townie would never put himself this "out" in the open like this. Like me, you may be considered sort of a "VI" which means that you aren't a threat to the scum, which could also be a reason that you are scum. But for now, this is getting a bit out of hand, and it's just going back and forth. Throughout are conversations, their our only some probable cause of suspecting each other here and there. While in the end, we are both just confused townies, or Pro-towns who are playing bad. So now, I admit that I might have falsely-accused you of being scum, but that does not remove my total suspicion.
Spadile, to pay for my possible false-accusation, I am asking if you want to form an alliance, like a Mason sort of thing to scumhunt?
I still suspect: Archaist, Snarky, and ZMuffinMan
Archaist - (
Leaning scum-read
) - Unlike Spadile, you are now trying to stay on the down low of any suspects, and stay anonymous, that is quite suspicious. I am not gaining much evidence from you being on my wagon, except that you were one of the last to get on it. As I said, it usually takes scum a bit longer to provide weak evidence and hop on a wagon. Anyways, your vote is still on me, do you still find me scum?
ZMuffinMan (
Leaning scum-read
) - Sorry, but I have a "gut" feeling that you might be scum. You've played more than I have, and your random vote was immediately a meta on me, since we've played in a game before. You knew what you were doing, and could have easily explained your random vote. Over-confidence there? Also, I am not liking your "activity posts" sort of thing. You aren't posting a lot, you have at max. 1-2 posts per page, some pages none. Either you are an SK trying to play it safe, a Pro-town, or a scum. Now, I know that your next post will be to defend this statement, and it will be pretty logical, but that won't remove my "gut" feeling of you being a potential scum. Also, I am asking you for a complete read on all your suspects so far, you said you would supply if we asked. This might change my view on you.
Snarky (
Null-read *Leaning scum
) - I am getting a Null read from you. You could be pretty much anything except SK, since SK's try to go about unnoticed and survive the reads, yet you are posting a lot. You aren't really scumhunting, and you aren't contributing much to the townie, except being here and posting. I would like to see a good quality wall post from you with all your reads. If you give me that, you might lean town, for me.
Anyways reasons for you Snarky:
1. Not contributing much, we can't gain much information from you
2. Active posting, and yet no contribution
3. You were one of the ones on my wagon, I am now accusing you for being scum, defend yourself
4. Also, you have to back up your statements, make them "strong", do not show any weakness in your words, say what you mean
Snarky wrote:Nope, I'm saying your cases are biaised.
Backup your statements, provide evidence.
---
Also Snarky, your vote is still on me, and your reasons for voting me are only as how I Self-voted.
But hasn't my Self-vote created more discussion than if I hadn't done?
It is also arguable that my without my Self-vote, this game would gone a bit slower than it is now.
But still, you have a vote on me, that means you still find me scummy, why is that?
You were the first on my wagon, are you so sure of me being scum?
. 
