OMG inhim.
...
Max wrote:Let's say for example we the town determine Amrun and Juls to be the two most likely players to be mafia. We tell them to duel each-other and we will kill them both. If they don't do this we will lynch them one after the other.
Alas, it turns out Juls is town. If she calls this duel then she would be allowing herself as town to die without people lynching her (this is the equivalent of self-hammering as town) and therefore we get little info out of the lynch/death as opposed to analysing who voted to be her lynched.
That is why it is actually a bad move as town.
But I want people to be voted into dueling. I want duels to come as a result of a majority decision via voting for duel candidates. So we do get a lot of info. Whatever we end up doing, I want as many people taking definitive stances as possible so that we have as much info as possible.
I can understand why players wouldn't want to die, as we all want to live and win, but if there is enough support for a lynch, then I think players have to be willing to duel. It's the mechanic of the game.
...
Juls 83 is good idea. If you're town about to be lynched, duel someone you want to empower.
Juls 105 pure gold.
...
Magister Ludi thinking rayFrost is scummy is... scummy. Also mentioning toasty as possibly scummy is... scummy. (I'm not seeing toasty as scum) Then saying he never said toasty was scum... is scummier.
...
Amrun's DK vote seems sort of pathetic given the amount of more important stuff going on. Fly-under-the-radar type vote.
...
I have no knowledge of the flavor of this game, and I am glazing over about it. Did Magister Ludi make a slip? If yes, I would not be surprised as his play this far seemed scummy already.
...
Myko 141 OMGUS votes me
Myko wrote:But it does show something: elvis is starting out passively. Caps don't help either, as she is just explaining with them that antitown = scum to her. She knows I'm not antitown.
There has been nothing passive about my play. I've been one of the most active posters so far, and I wanted to start voting even in pregame. What about that is passive? I am arguing strongly that I don't want scum like you floating the idea that town should be idiots and duel whoever and whenever they please.
confirm vote: myko
There has been some speculation about scum numbers in this game. This is what I think:
There is probably a low number of scum. The mechanic of this game is geared for a lot of early town deaths if we charge off and duel like crazy people. Double-lynch games need lower scum numbers. Also, there are probably scum PR's that can get empowered, which would also support lower scum numbers. Basically, scum want us to double-duel lynch between townies, or they want to duel with a townie and get empowered themselves. I'm not saying that anyone who wants to get empowered is scum, but I am saying that people who get empowered need to be scrutinized and held accountable if possible.
...
I STRONGLY disagree with allowing any supposedly obvtown minority to have more control over duels than others. That reads to me like a recipe for disaster. One reason is scum can sometimes fool us, you know. Another reason is that letting everyone participate equally lets you see who is making scummy moves.
...
I STRONGLY disagree with more than one dead guy for today. I say lynch or duel. Duel is probably more fun I guess, so I can go with that. But I only want one death. I want to see a flip and look at wagons before I agree to a double-death duel. And no fucking way do I agree to gammagoey double-double death explosion.
Talk nerdy to me.
"We must be willing to let go of the life we planned so as to have the life that is waiting for us." -Joseph Campbell