elvis_knits wrote:If YOU DUEL ANYONE WITHOUT MAJORITY APPROVAL I WILL LUST FOR YOUR LYNCH LIKE A HORNY TEENAGER.
Screaming for town cred.
elvis_knits wrote:If YOU DUEL ANYONE WITHOUT MAJORITY APPROVAL I WILL LUST FOR YOUR LYNCH LIKE A HORNY TEENAGER.
AlmasterGM wrote:Nah, my scum strategy is to buddy you, remember?
ReaperCharlie wrote:elvis_knits wrote:If YOU DUEL ANYONE WITHOUT MAJORITY APPROVAL I WILL LUST FOR YOUR LYNCH LIKE A HORNY TEENAGER.
Screaming for town cred.
Unvote; Vote: elvis_knits
elvis_knits wrote:Bastard 168... have you played a game here yet? Might want to read the wiki and a few newbie games...
C-worl 169 - NO. Are you a VI?If YOU DUEL ANYONE WITHOUT MAJORITY APPROVAL I WILL LUST FOR YOUR LYNCH LIKE A HORNY TEENAGER.This goes for anybody. Dueling without discussion and majority approval is scummy.
@inhim - game where scum tried to manipulate the public mechanic earlygame http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... =dollhouse
@DK, everyone on my scum lists is people I've been talking about, so read my posts.
I guess I'll respond to myko in a separate post...
Ray Frost - 98 wrote: This and this read like made up post restrictions to me.
mykonian - 141 wrote: I'm not the rushy type,
RC - 147 wrote: This is a fair point, but what do you say to the idea that voting "no winner" of said duel is, in effect, like voting both players? So, I mean, we're still getting information out of that.
VI - 150 wrote: GreyICE existence levels lower than anticipated.
elvis_knits - 154 wrote: Did Magister Ludi make a slip? If yes, I would not be surprised as his play this far seemed scummy already.
Maxous wrote:Short version - top mafia suspects are Ray Frost,Julsand CSL.
...Vi wrote:Amrun 196... Fluffposting evident.
Vi wrote:...Vi wrote:Amrun 196... Fluffposting evident.
Correction... Post 196 is spreading suspicion for the sake of spreading suspicion with immaterial reason.
...
Vi wrote:
Gammagooey 194... Appraisal of Magister Ludi's scumminess outside realistic parameters. More thorough explanation sought.
Maxous wrote:Juls - Post 151. Agreeing that discussion on the subject matter is distracting from scumhunting. This is after 4-5 posts of doing nothing to find scum. Trying harder to look pro-town than scumhunting.
Vi wrote:Query @elvis_knits. Differentiate mykonian as wrong versus mykonian as scum.
Maxous wrote:
GreyICE- Your vote on Almaster. Based on meta or reaction fishing?
Juls wrote:Why not play this game as normal. Then, if you are town, and you are about to be mislynched and there is no way to save yourself, you should Duel the person you have the biggest town read on so that in your death, we empower a townie. If someone hammers then they are auto-scummy. If someone refuses to L-2 duel, then an elected townie can force a duel. This should help us empower town as often as possible. Anyone who hammers is scummy. Anyone who duels without being elected is scummy. Anyone who duels someone else and flips scum should be heavily considered as scummy but not guaranteed (scum could wifom it).