Wizards at the Sorcerers' Den - Endgame

[Amrun]

What makes it interesting?

Why do you have Beefster as a town read?


I am starting to doubt a little and have Beefster as possibly bad town. I'm not sure yet.

[Soben]

Can we lynch Amrun yet?

[inHimshallibe]

What makes it interesting is that there are six people involved: Beefster and his voters. Take out my read (Beefster as town) and Mana_Ku, and you have 4.

Groups of 4 are interesting, as anyone in the game usually has about a 1/4 chance of being scum. When I find four people on a wagon I consider to be on town, it causes isolation and, in turn, happiness.

I've already stated that Beefster's response to ABR's question about damaging abilities was very likely town. And yes, probably bad town as you put it, but town nonetheless.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Yes we can, Soben, yes we can.

[Soben]

unvote, vote: Amrun

Regfan, do I have to do all the work of hunting scum around here? :'(

[Amrun]

Let's hope not, because so far that head hasn't been very good at it.

[implosion]

A week in, and I'm already chronically procrastinating. I'm probably going to wind up making a lot of wallposts, lol, but I'm not *that* far behind. It didn't take me too long to read the 10 pages that I had missed before, so it shouldn't take me too long to catch up, but I'm going to do it tomorrow. I'm going to sleep now.

[Soben]

I know Amrun, thats why I'm stepping in for him and changing our vote.

[Albert B. Rampage]

unvote, vote: Amrun

Had about enough of her attention-seeking and dropping Beefster's name every 5 posts. We're Day 1, dear. You don't have a guilty on him. Let it go. But I think you're scum anyway, because you try too hard and there's a dark cloud following every post you make.

[Amrun]

I was following up on my top suspect. That's called scumhunting, dear.

[Albert B. Rampage]

From this:

Just as I thought, Beefster, you had no real reason to think my logic was circular and no real reason to think I was scummy based off of that post, which makes it much more likely to be a chainsaw. In the very least, it is a bad and scummy attack.

To this:

Unvote; Vote: Beefster

I've thought about it and decided Beefster is more likely to be scum. Pine is still a good lynch, though.

Then this:

Nice town reads. You got any scum reads?

What a pathetic, reaching attack.

I read all your posts, Amrun. They don't look town to me. In fact, that last one looks real scummy. I'm just sayin.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Amrun I think you're pretty cool, and we're the same age and all, but you're SCUMMY. Very very scummy.

So I think I'm going to stick my vote to you and see if other people hop on or we will lynch someone else. 32 pages is already too much for Day 1.

[Baby Spice]

Such as this defense against a load of nitpicks and misrep: (And sheeping)

Don't like that he answered questions asked of someone else.

#1: Quote times that I have done that.
#2: That's not a scumtell. I do it all the time.
#3: Green Jello

Katy: How are Pine's huge piles of AtE making you think town?! Does it really matter? It's her opinion. If you have nothing else against Pine, you have a weak case.

Icey: One head?! Which head?! Your heads have different roles? Are you stupid? Hydra heads always have the same role

Soben: Do your heads have different roles?

Comments in ooc. These questions are just awful. Care to ask more relevant questions?
I stand my ground on Amrun.

]

Also don't like the use of ooc tags in someone elses quotes to do it. Smacks of trying to hide comments from iso reads.

Really? You're attacking me for THAT?

I'll attack anyone who looks like they're trying to hide things. Scum have to hide, not town.

Claims reaction testing for a rubbish case.

Fine. I'll admit it wasn't initially intended to be reaction fishing, despite it turning out that way. I still didn't like the way Amrun reacted to my case. 'sides, cases early in the day always suck compared to cases later in the game.

It wasn't reaction fishing, it was reaction fishing, it wasn't reaction fishing. Pick one.

I also think he's making up scumtells to suit who he wants to vote for. (Voting twice in a post, reading/not reading the thread)

Nah. I was pointing out tendencies. I thought it was interesting. I wasn't really planning on using it legitimately against her. (Once again, I told you it was a stretch.) Also, note where my vote is right now... Right. It's not currently on Amrun.

Tell me again who has to fake scum hunting and make up cases on people? I forget.

About voting twice: I forgot to unvote. What's so scummy about that?

You tell me, you're the one who seemed to vote someone for it.

Don't see a pro-town person behind these actions.

Sure. I play in a somewhat anti-town manner, even though I have town intentions. I'm still town.

We can only judge you by your actions, not your claimed intentions, and if you play in an anti-town manner then your anti-town.

Not liking the nitpicking and misrep. You've been sheeping a lot, too. (Like right now)

Whom have I been sheeping?
Nitpicking is me I admit, but the misreps are all yours.

[Soben]

Not sure Regfan (R) will be happy I changed the vote, but I know he definitely thinks Amrun is scummy as well. 32 pages really is a lot for d1 and we should get our serious business faces on. I'll let R explain why Amrun is scum because I'm too lazy and I'm generally slow and bad at explaining things.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Who the hell is Soben?

[Amrun]

Amrun I think you're pretty cool, and we're the same age and all, but you're SCUMMY. Very very scummy.

So I think I'm going to stick my vote to you and see if other people hop on or we will lynch someone else. 32 pages is already too much for Day 1.

You basically have to admit that Beefster's attacks were terrible. He's even admitted that.

He said, "You have circular logic and vote people in the same post." I didn't have circular logic and didn't vote people in the same post except voting Icey which everyone has done, but he votes people in the same post all the time.

Then he adds on a lot of other stuff which he can't substantiate either, culminating in, "Scum read the thread and town don't, so Amrun is scum."

He said his initial bad attacks were reaction fishing, and just this page or a page ago he admitted he lied about that. He's backtracked so many times.

Detailing to him why his attacks are incorrect isn't scummy. Telling me I'm scum because I read the thread IS a pathetic, reaching attack and that's just all there is to it.

I'm stuck at "dumb or scum" and I've been leaning scum all day, but lately, I've been reconsidering. Perhaps I'll be moving him to the dumb category when I re-read.

But please do tell me how debunking someone's terrible attack is scummy. I'd have done it no matter who he attacked, but it happened to be me. Either way it shouldn't matter.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Why are you more aggressive than usual?

[IceyCupcake]

Amrun annoys me too. I endorse this lynch.

/hop

Unvote, Vote: Amrun

[Amrun]

Why are you more aggressive than usual?

I'm not. I'm generally an aggressive player, though it does vary by mood a bit.

[Albert B. Rampage]

To be clear, Amrun doesn't annoy me, I feel that her emotional outbursts are off-putting and I can view them as dishonest. She strikes me as scum.

[Amrun]

And being "annoying" doesn't make me a good lynch, Icey.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Why are you in a bad mood in this game?

[Amrun]

To be clear, Amrun doesn't annoy me, I feel that her emotional outbursts are off-putting and I can view them as dishonest. She strikes me as scum.

What emotional outbursts? I haven't been emotional about this game.

I just put my srsbsns scumhunting face on because I got interested in the game.

[Albert B. Rampage]

What interests you about it?

[Amrun]

There are a bunch of new players I haven't played with before in it and some interesting interactions going on and I think the set-up will be cool. Plus, I've never played a no-claim game on this site before and it's fresh.

And I found a suspect to pursue, which is always fun.